U.S. in denial: Gabor
Matť on the psychology of Russiagate
Physician, mental health expert, and best-selling author Dr. Gabor Matť sits down with The Grayzoneís Aaron Matť to analyze how Russiagate was able to take hold of U.S. society following Donald Trumpís election.
By Aaron Matť
May 07, 2019 "Information Clearing House" - AARON MAT…: Itís The Grayzone, coming to you from The Peopleís Forum in New York City. Iím Aaron Matť, here with another Matť Ė his name is Gabor. He is a physician, an expert on childhood trauma, mental health, chronic illness, and the author of several best-selling books. Heís also my father. And I wanted to bring him today to discuss Russiagate, which is now in a new chapter. Many people are now grappling with the fact that Robert Mueller has just returned a verdict on the issue of a Trump-Russia conspiracy Ė which so many people were led to believe in Ė and Mueller has rejected it.
And so I wanted to talk to Gabor because he writes a lot about psychology and mental health, and I donít think we can understand what weíve just went through in Russiagate without understanding the psychological angle. So thatís why heís here. Very happy to have you, dad, on The Grayzone.
GABOR MAT…: Nice to be here with you Aaron.
AARON MAT…: So weíve just been through this two-year ordeal with Russiagate. Itís in a new phase now with Robert Mueller rejecting the outcome that so many were expecting, that there would be a Trump-Russia conspiracy. Your sense of how this whole thing has gone?
GABOR MAT…: Whatís interesting is that in the aftermath of the Mueller thunderbolt of no proof of collusion, there were articles about how people are disappointed about this finding.
Now, disappointment means that youíre expecting something and you wanted something to happen, and it didnít happen. So that means that some people wanted Mueller to find evidence of collusion, which means that emotionally they were invested in it. It wasnít just that they wanted to know the truth. They actually wanted the truth to look a certain way. And wherever we want the truth to look a certain way, thereís some reason that has to do with their own emotional needs and not just with the concern for reality.
Tired Of The Lies And Non-Stop Propaganda?
And in politics in general, we think that people make decisions on intellectual grounds based on facts and beliefs. Very often, actually, peopleís dynamics are driven by emotional forces that theyíre not even aware of in themselves. And I, really, as I observed this whole Russiagate phenomenon from the beginning, it really seemed to me that there was a lot of emotionality in it that had little to do with the actual facts of the case.
There is no question that for a lot of people in this country, the election of Trump was a traumatic event. Now, when a trauma reaction happens, which is to say youíre hurt and youíre pained and youíre confused and youíre scared and youíre bewildered, thereís basically two things you can do about it. One is you can own that Iím pained and Iím hurt and Iím bewildered and Iím really scared. And then try and look at what happened to bring me to that situation.
Or you can instead of dealing with those emotions come up with some kind of explanation that makes me feel better about them. So that Iíve got this pain. Iíve got this bewilderment. Iíve got this fear. So what Iím looking at, what does it say about American society that a man like this could even run for office, let alone be elected?
What does it say about American society that so many people are actually enrolled in believing that this man could be any kind of a savior? What does that say about the divisions and the conflicts and the contradictions and the genuine problems in this culture? And how do we address those issues?
You can look at that. Or you can say there must be a devil somewhere behind all this, and that devil is a foreign power, and his name is Putin, and his country is Russia. Now youíve got a simple explanation that doesnít invite you or necessitate that you explore your own pain and your own fear and your own trauma.
So I really believe that really this Russiagate narrative was, on the part of a lot of people, a sign of genuine upset at something genuinely upsetting. But rather than dealing with the upset, it was an easier way to in a sense draw off the energy of it in to some kind of a believable and comforting narrative. Itís much more comforting to believe that some enemy is doing this to us than to look at what does it say about us as a society.
I mean there was a massive denial of the actual dynamics in American society that led to the election of this traumatized and traumatizing individual as President, number one.
AARON MAT…: Because you think Donald Trump himself is traumatized?
GABOR MAT…: Oh, Donald Trump is a clearest example of a traumatized politician one could ever see. Heís in denial of reality all the time. He is self aggrandizing. His fundamental self concept is that of a nobody. So he has to make himself huge and big all the time and keep proving to the world how powerful and smart, what kind of degrees heís got and how smart he is. Itís a compensation for terrible self image. He canít pay attention to anything, which means that his brain is too scattered because it was too painful for him to pay attention.
What does this all come down to? The childhood that we know that he had in the home of a dictatorial child disparaging father, and a very weak
AARON MAT…: Fred Trump, his father.
GABOR MAT…: Who demeaned his children mercilessly. One of Trumpís brothers drank himself to death. And Trump compensates for all that by trying to make himself as big and powerful and successful as possible. And, of course, he makes up for his anger towards his mother for not protecting him by attacking women and exploiting women and boasting about it publicly. I mean, itís a clear trauma example. Iím not saying this to invite sympathy for Trumpís politics. Iím just describing that thatís who the man is. And the fact that such a traumatized individual can be elected to the position of what they call the most powerful person in the world speaks to a traumatized society.
And like individuals can be in denial, a society can be in denial. So this society is deeply in denial about its own trauma, and particularly in this case about the trauma of that election. So one way to deal with trauma is denial of it. The other way is to project onto other people things that you donít like about yourself.
Now, itís only a matter of historical fact. And no serious person, no serious student of history can possibly deny how the United States has interfered in the internal politics of just about every nation on earth.
AARON MAT…: And interfere, by the way, is a kind term. Weíre talking about what actual physical
GABOR MAT…: Iím talking about mass murder.
AARON MAT…: Manifestation. Exactly. Itís mass murder in many cases.
GABOR MAT…: For example, in Chile, thereís an elected government that America cheerfully overthrows, even boasts about it. Not to mention the current interference in Venezuela, the internal politics. Not to mention, how as youíve pointed out, many others have pointed out, and [Time] boasts about it on its cover, about how United States helped Boris Yeltsin get elected.
AARON MAT…: ďYankees to the rescue.Ē
GABOR MAT…: So even if itís true what the Russians have even if itís the worst thing thatís alleged about the Russians is true, itís not even on miniscule proportion of what America has publicly acknowledged it has done all around the world. And so this rage that we project, then, and this bad guy image that we project onto the Russians, itís simply a mirror a very inadequate mirror of what America publicly and openly and repeatedly does all around the world.
Now, you may think thatís a good thing to do. Iím not arguing about that. Iím not arguing politics. All Iím saying is projection is when we project onto somebody else the things that we do ourselves, and we refuse to deal with the implications of it. So thereís denial and then thereís projection.
And then, thereís just something in people. I can tell you well, your mother can tell you this that in relationships itís always easier to see ourselves as the victims than as the perpetrators. So thereís something comforting about seeing oneself as the victim of somebody else. Nobody likes to be a victim. But people like to see themselves as victims because it means they donít have to take responsibility for what we do ourselves.
AARON MAT…: I can relate to that, too.
GABOR MAT…: Yeah. Iím just saying the effect of somebody else. So this functions beautifully in politics. And populist politicians and xenophobic politicians around the world use this dynamic all the time. That whether itís Great Britain, or whether itís France with their vast colonial empires, theyíre always the victims of everybody else. The United States is always the victim of everybody else. All these enemies that are threatening us. Itís the most powerful nation on earth, a nation that could single handedly destroy the earth a billion times over with the weapons that are at its disposal, and itís always the victim.
So this victimhood, there is something comforting about it because, again, it allows us not to look at ourselves. And I think there was this huge element of victimhood in this Russiagate process.
(ďThe Resistance With Keith OlbermannĒ, GQ, December 2016)
KEITH OLBERMANN: The nation and all of our freedoms hang by a thread. And the military apparatus of this country is about to be handed over to scum who are beholden to scum, Russian scum. As things are today, January 20th will not be an inauguration but rather the end of the United States as an independent country
(ďThe Rachel Maddow ShowĒ, MSNBC, March 2017)
RACHEL MADDOW: But the important thing here is that that Bernie Sanders lovers page run out of Albania, itís still there. Still running. Still operating. Still churning this stuff out. Now. This is not part of American politics. This is not, you know, partisan warfare between Republicans and Democrats. This is international warfare against our country.
(ďAll In With Chris HayesĒ, MSNBC, February 2018)
JERROLD NADLER: Imagine if FDR had denied that the Japanese attacked us at Pearl Harbor and didnít react, thatís the equivalent.
CHRIS HAYES: Well, itís a bit of a different thing. I meanó
JERROLD NADLER: No, itís not.
CHRIS HAYES: They didnít kill anyone.
JERROLD NADLER: They didnít kill anyone, but theyíre destroying our country, our democratic process.
CHRIS HAYES: Do you really think itís on par?
JERROLD NADLER: Not in the amount of violence, but I think in the seriousness it is very much on par. This country exists to have a democratic system with a small D, thatís what the countryís all about, and this is an attempt to destroy that.
(ďAM JoyĒ, MSNBC, February 2018)
ROB REINER: We have been invaded in such a subtle way because we donít see planes hitting the buildings. We donít see bombs dropping in Pearl Harbor. But we have been invaded as Malcolm [Nance] points out. We are under attack, but we donít feel it. But itís like walking around with high blood pressure and then all of a sudden youíre not aware of it and you drop dead.
So itís insidious, and it has affected our blood stream. And if we donít do something about it Ė and thatís why, guys like John Brennan and James Clapper are running around with their hair on fire because theyíre trying to wake people up to tell them: We have to do something about it. We have to protect ourselves and if we donít, our 241 years of democracy and self-governance will start to collapse.
GABOR MAT…: And the assumption, that even if you take all the things that Russia was charged with in this whole Russiagate narrative over the last two and a half years, and if you multiply it by a hundred times, even then, you could not have possibly destroyed the United States. Even then, what is our self image if we think weíre that weak, that that kind of external interference could undermine everything that you believed this country has built over the last few centuries?í
So it shows to me a real shock reaction. And what has been shocked here is our beliefs in what this country is about.
And again, as I said before, itís in a sense more comforting. Itís frightening, but at the same time more comforting to see the problem as coming from the outside than to search for it with amongst ourselves and within ourselves.
AARON MAT…: How about then the aspect of this that puts so much hope into Robert Mueller? Because Robert Mueller was supposed to be our savior.
GABOR MAT…: First of all, if we actually look at who Mueller is, who is he?
Heís a man who, amongst many others, was 100 percent convinced that Iraq had weapons of mass discussion.
(FBI Director Robert Mueller, Congressional Testimony, February 2003)
ROBERT MUELLER: As Director Tenet has pointed out, Secretary Powell presented evidence last week that Baghdad has failed to disarm its weapons of mass destruction and willfully attempting to evade and deceive the international community. Our particular concern is that Saddam Hussein may supply terrorists with biological, chemical or radiological material.
GABOR MAT…: So given the line supported by Mueller led to the deaths of several hundred thousand Iraqi people and thousands of Americans, and has incurred costs that we all are fully aware of in terms of rise in terrorism and embroilment in multiple wars and situations, it takes an act of powerful historical amnesia for people to believe that this man is going to be our savior. Thatís the first point. Just incredible historical amnesia number one.
Number two, America, if you can judge by its TV shows, is very much addicted to the good guy/bad guy scenario. So that reality is not complex. And itís not subtle. And itís not a build up of multiple dynamics, internal and external. But, basically, thereís evil and thereís good. And evil is going to be cut out by the good and destroyed by it. And thatís really how the American narrative very often is presented.
Now, the same thing is projected into politics. So now if thereís a bad guy called Putin and his puppet called Trump, then there has to be a good guy that is going to save us from it. Some guy on a white charger thatís going to move in here, and is silver haired, patrician looking man whoís going to find the truth and rescue us all, which again is a projection of peopleís hopes for truth outside of themselves onto some kind of a benevolent savior figure.
Needless to say, when that savior figure doesnít deliver, then we have to argue that maybe he was bought off or corrupt or stupid himself or insufficient himself. Or that thereís something secret that has yet to be uncovered that some day will come to the surface that Mueller himself was unable to discover for himself.
But, again, this projection of hope onto some savior figure. Rather than saying, okay, thereís a big problem here. Weíve elected a highly traumatized grandiose, intellectually unstable, emotionally unstable, misogynist, self aggrandizer to power. Something in our society made that happen. And letís look at what that was. And letís clear up those issues if we can. And letís look at the people on the liberal side who, instead of challenging all those issues, put all their energies into this foreign conspiracy explanation. Because to have challenged those issues would have meant looking at their own policies, which tended in the same direction.
Rather than looking at how under the Clinton, theyíve jailed hundreds of thousands of people who should never have been in jail. Looking at how under the Bushes and under Obama, there was this massive transfer of wealth upwards. Instead of asking why Barack Obama gets $400,000 for an hour speech to Wall Street, which means that maybe our faith in how our system operates needs to be shaken a bit so we can actually look at whatís really going on, letís just put our attention on some foreign devil again.
AARON MAT…: And letís not reckon with the fact that these people like Barack Obama who made so many people feel so good about this country when he was elected. I was one of them. I remember feeling it was a hopeful moment.
GABOR MAT…: Not for me.
AARON MAT…: Well, I know not for you. Youíre more of a cynic than I am.
GABOR MAT…: I said on his day of his inaugural that this is the high point of his presidency. Itís going to be downhill from here.
But anyway, Obama soon he represented a more positive tendency in American life. I mean, at least he spoke the right language in many ways. And he genuinely wanted, probably, the right things to happen. But he had no genuine commitment to them or that he had no power to effect the policies that people needed, thatís another issue that the system maybe would not have allowed him to do it anyway even if he was genuinely committed. Those are separate issues.
But he did represent a movement towards peace towards at least internal peace towards confronting of racism.
AARON MAT…: Certainly not global peace. But maybe certainly on the racism front, yeah, definitely.
GABOR MAT…: Globally he was a warmaker like all the other American Presidents have been. But in terms of internally, he wanted to stand to reconciliation as opposed to naked hostility that Trump represents.
So thereís every reason why people should have concatenated to which means to become attached to the Obama brand, the Obama image. And for these people that were, all of a sudden the emergence of the Trump brand, again, is a huge shock. And, again, itís the shock that they have a great difficulty absorbing and dealing with.
And so, again, the foreign narrative is an easy emotionally easier way to deal with it. And it also means if youíre a journalist, instead of digging into what really happened, like what actually happened in that election, how did the Democratic elite deliberately try to marginalize the progressive candidate?
Like if he lacks discretion, letís assume that Russia did leak those Democratic e mails. Letís assume that. We donít know that they did. But we donít know that they didnít either. Letís assume that they did. Which is the greater assault on American democracy? The fact that the Russians leaked the document? Or that the American national Democratic leadership deliberately tried to marginalize one of their own candidates?
AARON MAT…: Sure and then also
GABOR MAT…: Which is the greater threat to democracy?
AARON MAT…: Sure. And then you have to look at what also ó which was the bigger boost to Trumpís candidacy? Was it some leaked e mails? Or was it billions of dollarsí worth of free air time from corporate media? And Hillary Clinton and her people choosing not to go to the key Rust Belt swing states because they felt the more they campaigned there, the worse theyíd do because her economic message was so unpopular. And these were states that Bernie Sanders won during the primary.
This gets toó
GABOR MAT…: Let me just interrupt to say that if I were those people, then, then quite apart from the shock defense that weíve already talked about, itíd be so much more convenient for me to go to the Russia narrative than to say publicly, you know what? We screwed up. We actually tried to undemocratically interfere with the Democratic nomination. We didnít pay attention to the people that were really hurting in the society because of our policies. We as the press gave this man all kinds of attention that he never deserved and never merited because he was interesting news and sold copies.
You know, instead of looking at ourselves, again, if I were those people, Iíd much rather create the impression that this is all the fault of somebody else from the outside.
AARON MAT…: And thereís a material incentive to do it. Because as youíve talked about, if youíre the Democrats and you look at the lessons of the election, you saw that people rejected your neoliberal economic legacy, that means you have to start challenging the powerful corporate sectors that youíve been representing for a long time, actually posing real alternative policies to Donald Trump.
If you do that, though, you risk losing your privileged status within the power structure. And the same thing if youíre in the media and you identify with that faction of the power structure.
As we wrap up, your advice to people for, you know, to avoid something like this in the future, or at least to give people an alternative way of dealing with of looking at scandals like this in the future that become all consuming, what you might want to see people do. What they can look at in themselves in relation to, sort of, all consuming political quote/unquote ďscandalsĒ like this?
GABOR MAT…: Well, first of all, I advise people to do something that I find hard to do myself, but I think itís essential. Which is that when thereís hard emotions there, just own them. Just own that youíre hurt. Own that youíre confused.
AARON MAT…: So in case of Trump winning, itís hurtful and confusing
GABOR MAT…: Just own it. Say Iím hurt, Iím confused, Iím terrified. And rather than try and find an explanation right away, just own the feeling. And then when youíre ready, then actually ask, what happened here? What actually happened here? What are the facts? What behaviors or beliefs on my part maybe contributed to the situation? So be curious. Be really curious.
In terms of what the public should do, I donít think most people were peddling anything deliberately. I donít think most people were trying to scare anybody. I think most people were simply caught up in a kind of a tsunami of fear and paranoia and shock reaction.
If you look at American history, from the Mexican war in the 1840s to the Spanish American wars in the 1890s, I think, the Vietnam War, to the Iraq war, every major I shouldnít say every. Many major movements in American history have been driven by lies and people being manipulated.
And the same newspapers that will eventually publish the Pentagon Papers and win awards for telling the truth will never apologize for having told the lies in the first place that later on they had to correct. And the newspapers that pushed the weapons of mass destruction narrative never apologized and said, ďWe were wrong. We contributed to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people.Ē They just carry on as if nothing happened.
And when the next item comes along, theyíll still sign on to the elite narrative. Which means to say that the public needs to have some historical memory. And to know that these sources that you trust as the fountains of truth and the sources of information at least be critical. At least be objective. Donít be so quick to jump on board. Donít be so quick to assume that because almost the whole media is broadcasting, trumpeting a certain line, that that line represents reality. Learn from history. Learn from this one. Learn from this Russiagate thing that they were all saying for years that this is a given fact. All of a sudden it turns out not to be a given fact. Well, next time, donít be so quick to believe them.
AARON MAT…: You have a line that you often say in your speeches about being disillusioned.
GABOR MAT…: Yeah. Well, I was once speaking in Berkeley, California, speaking to a few hundred people. And this was in the first or the second Obama administration.
AARON MAT…: First or second term of the Obama administration.
GABOR MAT…: Yeah. And it was a mixed race audience. A lot of black people there. And I asked people, how many people here have been disillusioned so far by Barack Obama? And a third to half of the people put their hands up. Hundreds of people put their hands up. And I said, would you rather be illusioned or disillusioned?
Would you rather believe in something thatís false, which means to have an illusion? Or would you rather be disillusioned? In other words, to see the truth. And Iím saying that we should be glad to be disillusioned.
So this Russiagate and this ignoble end to the Russiagate narrative, itís a disillusionment for a lot of people, but thatís a good thing. If they say, okay, I had this illusion, this illusion I no longer have, which means Iíve been disillusioned, now I can actually look at the truth. So itís good to be disillusioned.
So this could be a positive beginning for a lot of people if they take the right attitude. Rather than seeing it as a bad thing, they could see it as a good thing. Not as a good thing because it exonerates Trump. History will never exonerate Trump. And thereís plenty of reasons why Trump cannot be exonerated, both for his personal corruption and his political misleadership. So itís not a question of exonerating anybody. But itís a question of looking at everything objectively. Letís really look at whatís really going on. Letís be glad that weíve been disillusioned. Now itís an opportunity to become objective and really effective.
AARON MAT…: With that call for a positive beginning, weíll leave this there. Dr. Gabor Matť, thanks very much.
GABOR MAT…: Aaron Matť, thank you very much.
Aaron Matť is a journalist and producer. He is contributor to The Nation magazine and former host/producer for The Real News and Democracy Now!. Aaron has also presented and produced for Vice, AJ+, and Al Jazeera.
This article was originally published by "Grayzone" -
Note To ICH Community
We ask that you assist us in dissemination of the article published by ICH to your social media accounts and post links to the article from other websites.
Thank you for your support.
Peace and joy