Great Cover Up Of The Biggest Scandal In
December 25, 2019 "Information
-Joe diGenova has been
talking about the seditious plot to overturn
the 2016 election for at least a year, maybe
Unlike a lot of the people commenting on
this in the mass media, he is not using it
to sell books or boost his cable career.
He also knows how the FBI and DOJ works from
a practical matter. Being knowledgeable
makes him a rare guy in the commentariat.
Most of the people brought on as experts for
the cable chat shows know very little about
their alleged areas of expertise.
he has been one of the most hawkish people
on the Barr investigation, claiming that it
is a real investigation with real criminal
recent radio interview he
goes into the details of both the Barr
investigation and the ongoing impeachment
fiasco. He is a Trump partisan, so his
opinions on impeachment are predictable, but
his thoughts on the conspiracy are
interesting. He probably has access to
information from the Trump White House.
The interesting thing about all of this
is just how widespread the conspiracy was
during the 2015-2016 period. In that
interview he talks about former NSA Director
Admiral Mike Rogers, who is allegedly
cooperating with Barr and Durham.
What makes the Rogers issue interesting is
that he was the original whistle-blower.
He is not treated as such, because
the media hates Trump and anyone associated
with him, but
Rogers was the guy who
blew the whistle on the spying to the Trump
Are You Tired Of
The Lies And
No Advertising - No
Government Grants - This
Is Independent Media
What’s also interesting about
Rogers is he seems to have been a good guy,
who decided to put an end to the shenanigans
with regards to access to top-secret data by
FBI contractors. He closed off
their access at some point in 2016, which
put him in bad odor with the Obama
administration. He was eventually pushed
out, which suggests the conspiracy has roots
into the Obama inner-circle. That may
explain why the easy cases to be made
against the FBI conspirators are on hold.
That’s the other thing about the Rogers
case. As CTH
explains in that post, his
addition to the story reveals that the use
of the NSA database by political contractors
working for the Democrats goes back to at
least 2012. It is an axiom of
white-collar crime that the practice always
goes back much further than the evidence
initially reveals. Anyone who has done
forensic accounting knows this. You find the
first evidence of a crime, but it turns out
that the pattern goes back much further.
That may be what lies beneath
all of this. The great puzzle
thus far has been the lack of prosecutions,
despite ample evidence. The FBI agents are
all guilty of crimes that have been detailed
in public documents and the IG reports.
There is now proof that Comey perjured
himself many times. Just from a public
relations perspective alone, rounding up
these guys and charging them with corruption
seems like a no-brainer.
year into his tenure and Barr has charged no
one with a crime.
One obvious explanation is
that Barr is running a long con on Trump and
the rest of the country, on
behalf of the inner party. Robert Mueller
was supposed to use his investigation to
hoover up all the data so it could not be
made public, in addition to harassing the
Trump White House. His incompetence meant
Barr took over the job and is now hoovering
up all the information on the various
parties. That way, everyone has an excuse
for not doing anything about plot.
One bit of evidence in support of
this is the handling of the James Wolfe
issue. He was the Senate staffer caught
leaking classified information to one of the
prostitutes hired by the Washington Post.
Big media hires good looking young women to
sleep with flunkies like Wolf in order to
get access to information. Wolf was caught
and charged, but instead of getting a couple
years in jail, he
got two months. He will come out and
land into a six-figure job as a reward for
being a good soldier.
An alternative explanation is
that what started as a straight forward
political corruption case bumped into a long
pattern of behavior. In the
course of investigating that pattern, the
trail went much further back than the 2016
election. If there is evidence of abuse
going back to 2012, maybe it goes back
further. It was the Bush people, after all,
who pushed for the creation of secret courts
and secret warrants. Maybe Dick Cheney was
listening to your phone calls after all.
It is not just the linear aspect of this.
The sheer number of people involved
in just the FBI scandal is phenomenal.
There are at least 20 FBI people
named and dozens of bit players in the media
and DOJ. So far, the “contractors” with
access to the NSA database have not been
revealed, but that could be hundreds of
people, given that it seems to have been a
The corruption may not
only go back a long time, but cover a wide
swath of official Washington.
That may be the answer to
the great cover up. That’s what we are
seeing. This is a great cover up of the
biggest scandal in American history.
To date, no one has been charged with a
crime, despite hundreds of crimes being
documented. Many of the principals are now
enjoying high six figure lives, based on the
fact they were part of the seditious plot to
overturn the 2016 election. Instead of the
scandal of the century, it is the
celebration of the century for the inner
One of the signs of ruling class
collapse is when they can no longer enforce
the rules that maintain them as a ruling
class. When the Romans started
making exceptions to republican governance,
it was a matter of time before someone
simply decided the rules no longer applied
to them. Perhaps the robot historians will
consider Obama our Marius or Sulla. Maybe
that person is in the near future. Either
way, the rule of law is over and what comes
next is the rule of men.
This article was originally published by "Zero
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)