By Stephen Lendman
June 15, 2020 "Information
Clearing House" - Since taking office, the
Trump regime upped the stakes in Washington’s long war
by other means on Iran.
US hostility toward the Islamic Republic has nothing
to do with a national security threat that doesn’t
exist.
It’s all about its sovereign independence, wanting
Israel’s main regional rival neutralized and returning
Iran to US client state status, along with gaining
control over its huge hydrocarbon resources, some of the
world’s largest.
The Trump regime is waging all-out war on Iran by
other means.
In early June, the CIA-connected Washington Post
falsely claimed that Tehran might attack US regional
positions ahead of its November 3 presidential election.
Separately, recent reports by Fox News and the Times
of Israel perpetuated the myth about Iran getting closer
to being able to produce nukes.
Unreliable sources for these claims come from Israel
and US Iranophobes, no credible evidence supporting them
because none exists.
What’s going on is longstanding US/Israeli propaganda
war on Iran, pushing the envelope toward possible direct
confrontation beyond what already happened.
It’s a dangerous, high-risk game, risking war with a
nation able to hit back hard if preemptively attacked.
Are You Tired Of
The Lies And
Non-Stop Propaganda?
|
The latest inflammatory accusation against Iran
comes from UN secretary general Antonio Guterres, a
figure dismissive of US, NATO, Israeli high crimes
of war and against humanity.
Never condemning them, his customary response to
naked aggression is urging both sides to “show
restraint.”
His latest support for imperial interests over world
peace came from a conveniently leaked UN report last
week that cites him.
It claimed Iranian missiles were used to attack Saudi
oil installations last September, backing Trump regime
accusations at the time.
Ignored was longstanding US war on Yemen since
October 2001 — launched by Bush/Cheney, escalated by
Obama with Saudi involvement, Trump upping the stakes
exponentially.
In October 2016, Reuters claimed that Iran was
supplying Yemeni Houthis with weapons through
neighboring Oman — unnamed US, other “Western” officials
its source, along with Saudi Arabia.
In response, Omani Foreign Minister Yousef bin Alwi
debunked the accusation, saying:
“There is no truth to this. No weapons have crossed
our border and we are ready to clarify any suspicions if
they arise.”
Reuters admitted the following:
Yemeni “Houthis gained a trove of weapons when whole
divisions allied to former Yemen President Ali Abdullah
Saleh sided with them at the start of the war last
year,” adding:
“US and (other) Western officials who spoke to
Reuters about (access to weapons by Houthi fighters said
their claim) was based on intelligence they had seen but
did not elaborate on its nature” — its credibility very
suspect not explained by the wire service.
According to the leaked UN report, missiles used by
the Houthis have Iranian “design characteristics
(and/or) bear Farsi markings.”
Left unsaid was if Iran was supplying missiles to
Houthis, why would its authorities let them be easily
identified, notably by Farsi markings on them?
In response to 2018 accusations of Iran supplying
Houthis with missiles, then IRGC commander General Ali
Jafari debunked the claim, saying:
“How is it possible to send weapons, especially
missiles, to a country which is fully under siege and
there is even no possibility to send medical aid and
foodstuff?”
“Missiles fired at Saudi Arabia belong to Yemen which
have been overhauled and their range has been
increased.”
Iranian Defense Minister Amir Hatami denounced a
pattern of false US accusations, while ignoring its own
imperial high crimes.
On Saturday, Iran’s UN envoy Majid Takht Ravanchi
slammed the leaked UN report, saying:
“Iranian origin of arms (to Yemeni Houthis) is a
fallacy. The UN secretariat lacks capacity, expertise
and knowledge to conduct investigations,” adding:
“It seems the US, with its history of Iran-bashing,
sits in the driver’s seat to shape UN assessments.”
On Friday, Iran’s Foreign Ministry dismissed the
leaked UN report as unacceptable propaganda, adding:
“The UN Secretariat’s report is clearly under
political pressure from the US and Saudi regimes.”
It appears that the report “was prepared under
direction of the (Trump regime) to be used…in the
Security Council against Iran.”
“Such dictated processes will cause severe damage to
the credibility and undermine the integrity of the
United Nations.”
“The (Trump regime) is the gravest violator of
Security Council Resolution 2231, and no one can clear
the name of that State from systematic violations of
international rules.”
Iran is the region’s leading proponent of peace,
stability, and mutual cooperation with other nations —
at war with none, threatening none.
Its military capabilities are solely for defense, its
legal right under international law.
Its involvement in Syria is all about aiding
government forces combat US supported ISIS and
likeminded terrorists, Iranian military advisors in the
country, not combat troops.
The US, its key NATO allies, Israel, and the Saudis
are aggressor states, waging preemptive regional wars.
Instead of laying blame where it belongs for what’s
gone on endlessly in the Middle East, the region
transformed into a permanent war theater by the US and
its allies, Guterres falsely suggested that Iran
breached Security Council Res. 2231, unanimously
affirming the JCPOA.
Since adopted in 2015, taking effect in January 2016,
Iran has been in full compliance with its provisions —
no evidence suggesting otherwise.
In sharp contrast, the US breached the agreement,
notably by Trump abandonment of what’s binding
international and US constitutional law under its
Supremacy Clause (Article VI, Clause 2).
Britain, France, Germany, and the EU breached the
landmark agreement by failing to observe its provisions.
Iran slammed the new UN report, saying it was
prepared and leaked because of “political pressure from
the (Trump) and Saudi regimes.”
Its timing comes when Pompeo and other Trump regime
hardliners want the expiring UN arms embargo on Iran
kept in force permanently, along with UN sanctions ended
by the JCPOA reimposed.
The Security Council has final say on these issues.
Russia and China firmly oppose reimposition.
The US, no longer part of the JCPOA because of
Trump’s unlawful abandonment of the deal, is pushing
hard for reimposition.
Which way EU countries intend to go remains
uncertain.
Will they uphold the rule of law and save the JCPOA,
or let it die by siding with hostile Trump regime
policies against nonbelligerent Iran.
What happens will be known as things play out in the
weeks and months ahead.
Stephen Lendman was born in 1934 in Boston, MA. In
1956, he received a BA from Harvard University. Two
years of US Army service followed, then an MBA from the
Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania in
1960. Stephen now hosts the Progressive Radio News Hour
on the Progressive Radio Network three times weekly.
Distinguished guests are featured. Listen live or
archived. Major world and national issues are discussed.
Lendman is a 2008 Project Censored winner and 2011
Mexican Journalists Club international journalism award
recipient. Visit Stephen's website :
stephenlendman.org (Home
– Stephen Lendman). Contact at
lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.
Post your comment below