Search ICH


 Print Friendly and PDF

Trump says he caused UK's Huawei ban

By Guy Faulconbridge and Niklas Pollard

July 16, 2020 "Information Clearing House" - US President Donald Trump says he is responsible for Prime Minister Boris Johnson's decision to ban Huawei from Britain's 5G network, a remark that London brushed off and Beijing said proved the British move was political.

Johnson on Tuesday ordered Huawei equipment to be purged completely from Britain's 5G network by the end of 2027, risking the ire of China by signalling that the world's biggest telecoms equipment maker was not welcome in the West.

Washington had long been pressing for such a step, and is still calling on other European countries to make similar moves.

"We convinced many countries, many countries - I did this myself for the most part - not to use Huawei, because we think it's an unsafe security risk, it's a big security risk," Trump told reporters in the White House Rose Garden.

"I talked many countries out of using it: if they want to do business with us, they can't use it. Just today, I believe that UK announced that they're not going to be using it."

Britain has said that its ban on Huawei is motivated by its own security concerns and by worries that supplies of Huawei gear could be interrupted by US sanctions.

It denied that Trump alone was responsible for the Huawei ban. Asked about the comments, British Health Secretary Matt Hancock said: "Well, we all know Donald Trump, don't we."

China said Trump's remark showed Johnson's decision was about geopolitics rather than security.

"This once again demonstrates that the relevant bans on Huawei are completely unrelated to national security, rather this is highly politicised manipulation," foreign ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying said.

"The UK deciding to ban the use of Huawei will hurt the UK's own interests. The world is big. The UK is a relatively small place."

As Britain prepares to cast off from the European Union, fears over the security of Huawei have forced Johnson to take sides in the global rivalry between the United States and China.

Trump identifies China as the United States' main geopolitical rival, and has accused the Communist Party-ruled state of taking advantage over trade and not telling the truth over the coronavirus outbreak, which he calls the "China plague".

Washington and its allies say Huawei technology could be used to spy for China. Huawei has denied this.

Britain has acknowledged that without equipment from Huawei it will take it longer to roll out faster 5G mobile networks. China said investment in Britain will suffer.

"Now I would even say this is not only disappointing - this is disheartening," said Liu Xiaoming, China's ambassador to London.

Australian Associated Press -
"Source" -

No Advertising - No Government Grants - This Is Independent Media

Get Our Free Newsletter
You can't buy your way onto these pages

U.S. sanctions led to change in UK position on Huawei, says PM's spokesman

By Reuters

July 15, 2020 "Information Clearing House" - LONDON (Reuters) - Britain changed its position on using China’s Huawei in its 5G network because of U.S. sanctions, a spokesman for Prime Minister Boris Johnson said on Wednesday when asked about President Donald Trump’s comments that he was responsible.

“The reason for the UK’s change of position was the impact of the U.S. sanctions which were announced in May. Those sanctions were like nothing we had ever seen before, and led to the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) changing its assessments,” the spokesman told reporters.

“The U.S. sanctions make it impossible for the NCSC to continue to guarantee the security of Huawei equipment in the future.”

- "Source" -

Post your comment below

See also

Chinese state media says the UK must suffer a 'public and painful' retaliation for its decision to ban Huawei 5G and become 'America's dupe'

Brexit was meant to make Britain global. It has made us friendless




The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Information Clearing House.




Search Information Clearing House


The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Information Clearing House.

Click Here To Support Information Clearing House

Your support has kept ICH free on the Web since 2002.

Click for Spanish, German, Dutch, Danish, French, translation- Note- Translation may take a moment to load.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Information Clearing House has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Information ClearingHouse endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)

Privacy Statement