By Caitlin Johnstone
The western media are blaring headlines today about
a “revelation” by the US government which does not
actually reveal anything because it contains nothing
but empty narrative fluff.
“U.S. reveals Russian
plot to use fake video as pretense for Ukraine
invasion,” reads a
headline from CBS News.
“US reveals Russia may plan to create fake
pretext for Ukraine invasion,” claims
another from The Hill.
The claim is that the Russian government is
plotting to fabricate a false flag operation using a
graphic video with crisis actors in order to
manufacture a pretense for a full-scale military
invasion. State Department Spokesman Ned Price and
AP reporter Matt Lee had an
exchange about this claim at a Thursday press
conference that you simply must watch if you haven’t
already.
Have you seen "Help Tom with medical
expenses to fight leukemia"?
I
thought you might be interested in
supporting this GoFundMe,
https://gofund.me/8b902e5a
More
details here
Please share the
fundraiser on your social media to
help spread the word.
|
Lee
pointed out that claims about false flags and
crisis actors were “getting into Alex Jones
territory” and asked for the evidence for these
extraordinary claims, which one would think is
reasonable since extraordinary claims are generally
considered to require extraordinary evidence. Price
said that the evidence is “intelligence information
that we have declassified,” and when Lee asked where
the declassified information was Price looked at him
like he just asked the stupidest question in the
world and said “I just delivered it.”
The exchange goes on to reveal that Price really
did mean that the completely unverified government
assertion he’d just regurgitated is the
evidence for the claim being made, meaning the
evidence of the government assertion is that
assertion itself.
Refusing to relent, Lee kept hammering the point
that a completely unsubstantiated assertion is not
the same as evidence especially given all the
government assertions that have proved not to be
true over the years.
“Matt, you said yourself you’ve been in this
business for quite a long time,” Price replied. “You
know that when we make information, intelligence
information public, we do so in a way that protects
sensitive sources and methods.”
Ahh, so the evidence is secret. It’s top secret
evidence, to protect “sensitive sources and
methods”. It sure is convenient how all the evidence
of immensely consequential claims made by a
government with an extensive history of lying is
always far too sensitive for the public to be
permitted to scrutinize.
This is the kind of evidence you can’t see.
The evidence is invisible.
Copyright © 2022 by RonPaul Institute.
Permission to reprint in whole or in part is
gladly granted, provided full credit and a live
link are given.
The views expressed in this article are
solely those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect the opinions of Information Clearing House.
Reader financed- No
Advertising - No Government Grants -
No Algorithm - This
Is Independent
Registration is not necessary to post comments.
We ask only that you do not use obscene or offensive
language. Please be respectful of others.