|
Secretive firm helps U.S. wage information war abroad
By Stephen J. Hedges
11/13/05 "Baltimore
Sun" -- -- WASHINGTON // To fight what it sees
as an insidious propaganda war waged by militants, from incendiary
Web sites to one-sided television images of the Iraq war, the
Pentagon has been quietly waging its own information battle
throughout the Middle East and Central Asia.
One of its primary weapons is a secretive firm that has been
criticized as ineffective and too expensive.
The Rendon Group, directed by former Democratic Party political
operative John Rendon, has garnered more than $56 million in work
from the Pentagon since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
These contracts list such activities as tracking foreign reporters;
"pushing" news favorable to U.S. forces; planting television news
segments that promote American positions; and creating a grass-roots
voting effort in Puerto Rico on behalf of the U.S. Navy, according
to Pentagon records.
The contracts, some of which were obtained by the watchdog group
Judicial Watch through a Freedom of Information Act request, reveal
that the Bush administration is engaged in a constant war of images
and words with al-Qaida and other radical groups.
Seen as necessity
Civilian and military leaders say the contracts are necessary to
fight the media wars waged by Islamic fundamentalists who control
images on television, radio and the Internet in some Arab countries.
But proponents of open government question the role of firms such as
the Rendon Group, suggesting that their work blurs the line between
legitimate news and propaganda.
Also, Americans have long been nervous about the notion of the
government's managing information.
To the extent that the Pentagon is attentively studying media
publications, there's nothing wrong with that, said Steven Aftergood,
a secrecy expert at the Federation of American Scientists.
"Where it gets questionable is when they start engaging in
media-based operations," Aftergood said, meaning actually
distributing news items. "And that's something that needs to be
carefully circumscribed and defined in policy, because there is no
clear line between the foreign media and U.S. media."
The Rendon Group is perhaps best known for its part in the
controversy that surrounded the Pentagon's short-lived Office of
Strategic Influence nearly four years ago. A February 2002 New York
Times article disclosed the office's existence and reported that the
company was part of the effort, which possibly included attempts to
plant false new stories abroad.
After public and congressional outcry, Defense Secretary Donald H.
Rumsfeld shut down the office.
But John Rendon, who until now has declined to discuss the episode,
said in an interview last week that the news stories were wrong and
that his company never worked for the Office of Strategic Influence.
"That wasn't us," Rendon said. "The whole notion of putting false
news stories abroad, that was never us."
Retired Air Force Brig. Gen. S. Pete Worden, who directed the Office
of Strategic Influence during its short life, confirmed by e-mail
that the Rendon Group did not work for his office.
"[Rendon] is correct that he didn't work directly for my office,"
Worden wrote. "Most of the actual work we did was through SAIC," or
Science Applications International Corp., a large defense
contractor.
Shaping coverage
Rendon has, however, played a substantial role in the Pentagon's
efforts to track and shape media coverage of the Iraq and Afghan
conflicts and the war on terror.
Rendon has at least five contracts with the Department of Defense,
according to the newly obtained records. A full list of the
contracts given to Judicial Watch by the Pentagon totals about $45
million.
The work began in 2000 and continues today, the contracts show. They
include work, supervised by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, for the Air
Force, Army, Navy and Defense Advance Research Projects Agency.
Most recently, Rendon was awarded a $6.4 million contract in
September to track media coverage in Iraq.
Rendon also won a $1.4 million contract in 2004 to advise the staff
of Afghan President Hamid Karzai, and a $3.9 million contract to
work on a counter-narcotics campaign within the Afghan Interior
Ministry.
The Rendon Group's costs were an issue among CIA staff members
during the group's earlier work with the CIA and Pentagon. Rendon
once received a CIA contract of $20 million to $40 million,
according to former employees, to advise the then-London-based Iraqi
National Congress and its leader, Ahmad Chalabi.
The Pentagon offices that work with Rendon - the Joint Chiefs of
Staff and the Office of Special Operations and Low Intensity
Conflict - declined to comment. So did Douglas Feith, who recently
resigned as under secretary of defense for policy.
Rendon's previous experience positioned him well for the Pentagon's
new war needs.
Rendon worked in the political world until 1989, when he took a job
advising the Panamanian opposition on how to handle the media during
the U.S. invasion to oust dictator Manuel Noriega.
He took up similar jobs after that, including advising the Kuwaiti
government after Iraqi troops invaded in August 1990.
When the Sept. 11 attacks occurred, Rendon already had an active
Pentagon contract.
"This is really probably the 10th or ninth time we've done this kind
of work, going all the way back to Panama, with the exception of
Somalia," Rendon said. "Nobody else has done this."
Stephen J. Hedges writes for the Chicago Tribune.
Copyright © 2005, The Baltimore Sun
Translate
this page
(In accordance with Title 17
U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to
those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational purposes.
Information Clearing House has no affiliation whatsoever with the
originator of this article nor is Information Clearing House
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.) |
