|
The Dirty War: Torture and mutilation used on Iraqi 'insurgents'
Bombs around Baghdad killed 33 people yesterday, but out of sight is
a much more shadowy conflict - one in which the US and Britain seem
unable to stop death squads and disappearances.
By Kim Sengupta
11/20/05 "The
Independent" -- -- Amid the acrid smoke and dust, the
cries of the injured being dragged out of the rubble, General Adnan
Thabit arrived at the Hamra hotel bomb site in sunglasses, pressed
fatigues and a crimson beret.
"Well, gentlemen," he said to me and another journalist who had just
been blasted out of our hotel rooms by suicide bombers, "this is
what happens when terrorists carry out terrorism - a lot of people
dead, a lot of people hurt. Now you can see what we are up against."
The general was savouring his moment. His special forces have been
accused by the media and others of carrying out the worst human
rights abuses against "suspected insurgents" in what is becoming an
ever more savage and dirty war.
Behind the daily reports of suicide bombings and attacks on
coalition forces is a far more shadowy struggle, one that involves
tortured prisoners huddled in dungeons, death-squad victims with
their hands tied behind their backs, often mutilated with knives and
electric drills, and distraught families searching for relations who
have been "disappeared".
This hidden struggle surfaced last week when US forces and Iraqi
police raided an Interior Ministry bunker only a couple of hundred
yards from where we were standing. They found 169 tortured and
starving captives, who looked like Holocaust victims. The
"disappeared" prisoners were being held, it is claimed, by the Shia
Muslim Badr militia, which controls part of the ministry. Bayan Jabr,
the Minister of the Interior, is himself a former Badr commander,
but the ministry's involvement does not end there: General Adnan's
commandos come under its control. So does the Wolf Brigade, which
vies with the commandos for the title of most feared.
Baghdad is now a city in the shadow of gunmen. As I left the Hamra
to replace what was lost in my bombed room, I had to negotiate
checkpoints of the Badr militia, their Shia enemies, the Mehdi Army
of the radical cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, and the Kurdish peshmerga.
The Iraqi police and the government paramilitaries have their own
roadblocks.
And there are others: the Shia Defenders of Khadamiya - set up under
Hussein al-Sadr, a cousin of Muqtada, who is an ally of the former
prime minister Iyad Allawi - and the government-backed Tiger and
Scorpion brigades. They all have similar looks: balaclavas or
wraparound sunglasses and headbands, black leather gloves with
fingers cut off, and a variety of weapons. When not manning
checkpoints, they hurtle through the streets in four-wheel drives,
scattering the traffic by firing in the air. Out of sight they are
accused of arbitrary arrests, intimidation and extrajudicial
killings.
The US and Britain, which trained many of the forces involved, and
which still have ultimate responsibility for them, are implicated.
But the pattern of illegality is also the continuation of a process
that began with the questionable justification for the invasion.
American and British forces have played their own part, from the
abuses of Abu Ghraib to deaths in British military custody, from the
deployment of white phosphorus as a chemical weapon in the assault
on Fallujah to the wild use of overwhelming American firepower,
which some have called almost as indiscriminate as the killings
caused by Sunni insurgents' car bombings.
But more than two years after President George Bush officially
declared a victorious conclusion to the war in Iraq, the body count
continues to rise. Faced with an insurgency that shows no signs of
abating, the US and Iraqi government rely more and more on the
paramilitaries. Donald Rumsfeld, the US Defence Secretary, has said
units such as General Adnan's commandos are among "forces that are
going to have the greatest leverage on suppressing and eliminating
the insurgency".
Those on the receiving end of some of this "leverage", however,
describe terrifying experiences. Ahmed Sadoun (not his full name)
was arrested in the middle of the night at his home in Mosul by
government paramilitaries accompanied by American soldiers. He was
held for seven months before being released without charge and left
Iraq as soon as he could.
Speaking from Amman, Mr Sadoun, a 38-year-old engineer, said: "They
kicked down our door and asked about a neighbour. When I said I did
not know where the man was, they started kicking me and beating me.
The soldiers had paint on their faces and did not have same uniforms
as other troops. The Americans did not take part, but they saw what
was happening.
"But this was nothing. When they took me to their base I was
blindfolded and beaten very, very badly with metal rods. They then
hung me up on hooks by my wrists until I thought they would tear
off. I think that stopped because one of the Americans said
something. I could hear English spoken in an angry voice. But this
happened again later.
"I was in a room which was so small that not all the prisoners could
even lie down properly. All night we could hear people screaming,
people being hit. One day they said I could go, but after what
happened to me I know they could do this to me again. So I left."
At one roadblock I met the Wolf Brigade, which was widely involved
in suppressing disturbances in Mosul around the time Mr Sadoun was
being held, though he does not know which paramilitaries seized him.
One of them took off his balaclava and turned out to be in his late
teens, belying the ferocity of the snarling wolf badges on his arms.
The young man shook his head about what happened at the Hamra. "That
is bad, very bad," he said. "But you are alive, that is good - too
many dead people in Baghdad." He was keen to make the point that
"the people like us because we kill the people who try to kill them.
Listen, mister, we are fighting bad people, you cannot treat them
like normal persons."
But what about the innocent who get caught and end up being abused
in detention centres? "Mister, those are just lies, you must not
believe them. These people are terrorists. We are here because the
police cannot do the job by themselves."
The paramilitary influence on the police is particularly overt in
the British-controlled south of Iraq, where the British invited the
militias to join the security forces, and then saw them take over.
Nothing was done by the British authorities when police in plain
clothes, along with their militia colleagues, killed Christians,
claiming they sold alcohol, or Sunnis for being supposedly
Baathists.
Action was only belatedly taken when a particularly menacing
faction, a "force within a force" based at the Jamiat police station
on the outskirts of Basra, captured two SAS soldiers who were
gathering information on their mistreatment of prisoners.
British troops smashed into a police station to rescue the two
soldiers and later arrested more than a dozen others. But now they
more or less stay out of Basra, leaving Iraq's second city at the
mercy of a police force that even its commanders say they barely
control. There have been dozens of assassinations, including that of
at least one foreign journalist.
Even families of fellow policemen are not exempt. Ammar Muthar, a
member of the border police, knew his father, Muthar Abadi, was on
the Shia militia hit list, because he had acted as a missile
engineer in the war against Shia Iran. Ammar brought his father from
Al-Amarah to Basra for safety. But while he was out one day, six
policemen, in uniform but wearing black masks, dragged Abadi away.
His body was later found, shot five times, three in the face.
"The neighbours could do nothing because it was the police who took
him away," said Ammar. "They wanted to kill him, and no one could
stop them."
One British officer said: "You hear about the militias infiltrating
the police. But they did not have to. We invited them to join."
THE CHARGE SHEET
Endemic torture of prisoners
The discovery last week of starved and tortured prisoners in an
Interior Ministry bunker emphasised that detention without due
process remains endemic in Iraq, echoing the Saddam era. In Basra,
militia elements in the police used cells to imprison and torture
their enemies. When the Abu Ghraib abuse scandal broke, it emerged
that among the prisoners being maltreated by US soldiers were
"undocumented" detainees who had been kept hidden from the Red
Cross. And Britain was shamed by the death of Baha Mousa, a Basra
hotel clerk, in British military custody.
Use of napalm and phosphorus
Last week the Pentagon admitted using white phosporus as an
offensive weapon in last year's assault on Fallujah. Its official
use is to create smokescreens to shield troop movements, but if
fired into trenches or foxholes it can burn victims to the bone. The
legality of this use is debatable. Last year the US also admitted,
after previous denials, that it had used napalm - which Britain has
banned - against Iraqi forces during the invasion. There is also
controversy over the deployment of cluster munitions, which Britain
has said should not be used in or near civilian areas.
Extra-judicial killings
Early in the insurgency, it appeared that Sunnis loyal to Saddam
were attacking defenceless Shias - an impression the coalition
authorities sought to reinforce. Extra-judicial killings by Shias in
the paramilitary groups operated by the Interior Ministry, or in
party militias, have become increasingly open. Victims are rounded
up in house-to-house raids at night and their bodies, frequently
handcuffed, are found dumped later. Sunni civilians are the main
target, but Shias seen as collaborators under Saddam, or connected
with rival militias, have also "disappeared".
Indiscriminate 'spray and slay'
Heavy-handed tactics against the insurgency, dubbed "spray and
slay", have attracted much criticism. The current American offensive
in the west and north-west appears to replicate the methods used in
Fallujah: the population is ordered to leave before the town is
sealed off and subjected to an air and ground assault. Those killed
are invariably described as insurgent fighters, even in incidents
where there is strong evidence that groups of civilians, including
women and children, have been caught up in airstrikes.
Translate
this page
(In accordance with Title 17
U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to
those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational purposes.
Information Clearing House has no affiliation whatsoever with the
originator of this article nor is Information Clearing House
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.) |
