|
Tea For Two
By Remi Kanazi
12/05/05 "ICH"
-- -- Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon—the little
teapot, short and stout—is making a comeback. He ditched the
outdated threads of his radical Likud to prance in the open fields
of peace with favorite "doves" like Shimon Peres. The word on the
street is that Sharon will be changing his last name to Gandhi
before visiting with militant groups in the Occupied Territories to
find out what they're all so mad about. The people of West and the
nearsighted Israeli public are biting this propaganda, hook, line
and sinker, while the Palestinians are left to rummage through the
trash bin of peace.
If one were to examine the mind of the Butcher of Beirut, one could
see where "peace" will lead the Palestinian people. Peace will not
lead the Palestinians to the internationally recognized 1967 borders
(22 percent of historic Palestine) because Arik doesn't believe in
"land for peace." What will the new "generous offer" be? A
semi-autonomous Gaza Strip used as bombing practice by Israel and
small non-connecting cantons in the West Bank cut off by settler
roads, "security" checkpoints, and a towering "barrier" reminding
Palestinians of what prison walls look like. Where do I sign?
According to the PM's top advisor, Eyal Arad, Sharon will introduce
a new equation, "security for independence." Arad argued that the
issue of land is not central to the conflict, contending that
security is the real complication. Arad is correct in giving weight
to security. Over the last five years Palestinians have been
bombarded by Israeli gunship helicopters armed with hellfire
missiles and occupied by tanks which have killed hundreds of lives
and destroyed billions of dollars worth of infrastructure. We can't
forget the American made Caterpillar D-9 bulldozers that demolished
thousands of Palestinian homes and helped build the insidious path
of the Apartheid Wall. I wonder when the Palestinian people will
feel one ounce of security from their occupiers?
Nevertheless, we must not overlook the importance of independence.
The Palestinian people, as outlined in UN Resolutions 242 and 338,
deserve independence from an illegal occupation. For the past 38
years Israel continuously violated the Palestinian people's
fundamental human rights. This ran concurrent to the killing of
hundreds of Palestinian children by Israeli forces and the wounding
of tens of thousands more. These tragedies were compounded by the
annexation of Palestinian land, the instillation of curfews,
checkpoints, and water deprivation, as well as the building and
expansion of Israeli settlements, Israeli only roads, and military
posts. While Sharon diminished the importance of land, Arad,
speaking on behalf of the Palestinian people without permission,
claimed that Palestinians only "really" care about independence.
Arad claimed, "What the Palestinians sought was not really
territories that they could control and run in the form of the Camp
David proposal. What they really sought was independence." Has Arad
acquired the analytical skills to understand the Palestinian psyche
or did he just take a chapter out of the South African Apartheid
playbook?
The Israeli advisor claims that the 1967 borders for peace won't
work because, "If you look at the bare statistics, since the Oslo
agreement terrorism has increased many many times." What Arad
curiously omits is that if you look at the "bare statistics,"
illegal Israeli settlements that shatter the 1967 border have
expanded "many many times" since the Oslo agreement.
The Palestinian people, including the refugees of 1948 and 1967, are
well deserving of land, as stated under multiple UN resolutions.
Resolution 194 explicitly states, "The refugees wishing to return to
their homes and live at peace with their neighbors should be
permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date." The resolution
continues to state, "the Governments or authorities responsible"
should compensate "those choosing not to return and for loss of or
damage to property." In 1967, Resolution 242 called for Israel to
withdraw from "territories occupied" and this call was reaffirmed in
Resolution 338.
Arik bungled the equation. His military mind came up with "[Israeli]
Security for [Palestinian] independence." But now that he is
training to become the new champion of peace he must realize that
[Palestinian] land, security, and independence equal Israeli
security. The problem with Oslo and every other "good faith"
agreement is that they weren't peaceful: they were interest-filled
propaganda for the public, while the status quo was maintained on
the ground. If the little teapot wants to rid himself of his
disgruntled neighbor, he must revert to an equation that is fair for
the Palestinian people, making the issue of security a problem of
the past. History shows, however, that Mr. Short and Stout only tips
one way and unfortunately it's not in the direction towards peace.
Remi Kanazi is the primary writer for the political website
www.PoeticInjustice.net. He lives in New York City as a Palestinian
American freelance writer and can reached via email at remroum@gmail.com
Translate
this page
(In accordance with Title 17
U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to
those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational purposes.
Information Clearing House has no affiliation whatsoever with the
originator of this article nor is Information Clearing House
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.) |
