|
Open and Shut
Four years later, we still have ten big questions
By Jarrett Murphy
12/06/05 "Village
Voice" -- -- On Monday, December 5, the 9-11
Public Discourse Project—a private group formed by 9-11 Commission
members after their official mandate lapsed in 2004—held a wrap-up
press briefing in Washington, signaling the last gasp of official
inquiries into the attacks four years ago. The National Institute of
Standards and Technology also recently completed its final report on
the twin towers. Already gathering dust are a Federal Emergency
Management Agency study, the joint inquiry by Congress, the McKinsey
reports on New York City's emergency response, probes by federal
inspectors general, and other efforts to resolve the myriad doubts
about the hijackings.
Some questions can't be answered: People who lost loved ones will
never know exactly how the end came, if it hurt, what the final
thoughts and words were. But other questions are more tractable.
Here are 10 of them:
1. Where was the "National Command Authority"?
There has never been a true accounting of why the nation's leaders
were out of the loop for so long that morning. George W. Bush and
his aides even have told different versions of how the president was
actually informed of the first plane striking: The president claimed
erroneously that he saw it on TV, while chief of staff Andrew Card
said it was Karl Rove who told the president. According to the
official version, after Rove told Bush, the president talked to then
national-security adviser Condoleezza Rice. She told him about the
crash but apparently did not know about the reported hijacking of
American Airlines Flight 11, which military air defenses learned
about 17 minutes earlier.
Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld was informed of the second
plane hitting the WTC—yes, the second plane—during his intelligence
briefing but continued the briefing and was at his desk when Flight
77 struck the Pentagon.
Together, the president and secretary of defense are the National
Command Authority that is supposed to lead the country in the case
of military emergency. But Bush didn't get in touch with Rumsfeld
until after 10 a.m., around the time the fourth and final plane
crashed in Shanksville, Pennsylvania. When Bush was criticized days
after 9-11 for failing to return to Washington until more than 10
hours after the first attack, the White House claimed there had been
a threat ("real and credible," in flack Ari Fleischer's words) to
Air Force One. There was none. All the 9-11 Commission says of this
phantom threat is that it was the product of "a misunderstood
communication."
2. Who gave the order to try to shoot the planes down?
The commission is noticeably vague on this point. The official
version says Dick Cheney told the military a little past 10 a.m. to
shoot down a threatening plane, claiming that the president had
given his approval for the order. But while a few people in the
White House bunker noted a call between Cheney and Bush moments
earlier, only Rice says she heard Cheney bring up the shoot-down
order. Despite the fact that people at both ends of the call were
taking notes, the commission found that "there is no documentary
evidence of this call." Meanwhile, some of the fighter jets in the
air over D.C. received no orders to shoot down planes, while other
military aircraft got the OK from the Secret Service to fly "weapons
free," which means they had wide authority to take out suspicious
aircraft.
Since the military was given little or no notice about the planes,
maybe it doesn't matter who authorized a shoot-down. But the record
is unclear. Neither Cheney nor Bush testified under oath before the
9-11 panel, in public or private.
3. What exactly were all those firefighters doing in the towers?
Reports on the disaster reflect confusion over the exact mission of
the firefighters who climbed the twin towers, many of whom died. The
9-11 Commission says fire chiefs decided early on that because the
fire was so big, their job would "primarily be one of rescue." But
NIST reports that some fire commanders thought their men would fight
fires to save people trapped above them, and individual fire
companies thought their mission was to "get up to the fire as soon
as possible, put the fire out, and get ready for their next
assignment." According to oral histories collected by the FDNY, some
firefighters were told to head up the stairs carrying hoses, and
others to drop their hoses in the lobby. Some were ordered simply to
head up the stairs without a clear idea of where they were going or
why.
While it is doubtless that first responders saved lives that day,
it's not clear that there were many people left to be rescued when
late-arriving firefighters began climbing the stairs, especially in
the north tower. Mayors Giuliani and Bloomberg have said up to
25,000 people escaped the towers; NIST has put that figure at around
15,000—still a blessing. But NIST believes that 90 percent of those
civilians who survived started descending both towers before the
second plane hit. (About 1,000 of them were "mobility impaired" and
needed help getting out.) Just shy of 2,000 of the roughly 2,150
civilians who died in the towers were trapped above the impact
zones, with no chance of rescue.
4. Did anyone think the towers would collapse?
Reports on the FDNY response to 9-11 generally agree that, as the
FDNY-commissioned McKinsey study put it, "Chief officers considered
a limited, localized collapse of the towers possible, but did not
think that they would collapse entirely." For some of the fire
officers, that confidence might have been based on a misconception
about how the towers were built: The FDNY chief of safety says in
his oral history that he thought the towers were made of block
construction, with a solid concrete core, so that fire crews would
have at least three hours to work. In fact, the cores of the towers
were sheetrock over steel. And the citywide safety chief in charge
that day didn't know a plane had hit the north tower.
Evidently, fears about collapse evolved as the disaster wore on.
Peter Ganci, the highest ranking chief and one of the 343 fire
personnel who died, reportedly told the commander in the north-tower
lobby at 9:45 a.m. that he might want to consider an
evacuation—almost 45 minutes before that building collapsed.
Assistant Chief Joseph Callan, the citywide tour commander that day,
told investigators: "Approximately 40 minutes after I arrived in the
lobby I made a decision that the building was no longer safe and
that was based on the conditions in the lobby—large pieces of
plaster falling, all the 20-foot-high glass panels on the exterior
of the lobby were breaking, there was obvious movement of the
building, and that was the reason on the handy talky I gave the
order for all fire department units to leave the north tower.
Approximately ten minutes after that we had collapse of the south
tower." Fire chiefs also received—just moments before the south
tower fell—a report that someone from the city's Office of Emergency
Management thought the towers weren't structurally sound. The source
of that report is unknown.
5. Why was Giuliani's command bunker at ground zero?
A constant refrain in rehashes of 9-11 is that the cooperation
between police and fire services that day was poor. The OEM was
unable to bridge the gap because it was busy evacuating its own
emergency center in 7 WTC. "The loss of the OEM operations center,"
NIST found, "created difficulties related to the coordination of
emergency responder operations and resources." Because the World
Trade Center had been a terrorist target in 1993, Giuliani was
criticized in 1998 for his decision to locate the emergency center
there. Yet when Giuliani and Jerry Hauer (who was OEM director when
the 7 WTC site was picked) appeared before the 9-11 Commission, no
one asked them about the bunker. Nor did commissioners ask Giuliani
specifically why firefighters were using the same radios on 9-11
that had worked so poorly in the '93 bombing. Part of the reason was
the city had broken contracting rules when it purchased new radios
earlier in 2001, and those radios had to be withdrawn because of
technical problems.
6. Why did 7 WTC fall?
Seven World Trade Center—where, besides OEM, the CIA, Salomon Smith
Barney, and other entities had offices—was the last building to
collapse on 9-11. It was also probably the first steel skyscraper
anywhere to collapse solely because of fire. We still don't know
why. While NIST has completed its twin towers reports, it has
delayed its 7 WTC report twice; it's currently not expected until
next spring.
Several 7 WTC tenants, including OEM and the Secret Service, had
tanks filled with diesel fuel to power emergency generators. If that
fuel leaked and burned, it may have heated the building's steel
supports to the point of failure, but according to FEMA's report on
the collapse this "best hypothesis has only a low probability of
occurrence."
7. How did the twin towers fall?
Many FDNY personnel who saw the south tower collapse reported
explosions at the lower levels as the top began collapsing. These
reports, as well as "squibs" of smoke seen on video of the
collapses, have led to theories that the towers were brought down in
controlled explosions. NIST dismisses these notions, claiming that
the puffs of smoke were the result of air being forced down by the
top of the tower collapsing.
NIST said the towers fell because the planes shook fireproofing
loose from the steel superstructure, and the fire heated the
floor-supporting trusses so much that they pulled in on support
columns that were already holding more than their regular load. But
NIST's computer simulation stops at the point the collapse begins,
and does not document exactly how the rest of the buildings crumbled
in 10 seconds. The reason for this omission could be the sheer
complexity of the computations—even NIST's simplified model took
weeks to run on a computer.
Conspiracy theorists aren't the only ones who dispute NIST's
version: Some fire scientists also take issue with the institute's
methods and conclusions. And the point isn't just historical. The
lessons learned from the WTC collapse will inform decisions about
the safety of other modern office towers.
8. How dangerous was—and is—the air at ground zero?
A few days after the towers fell, the Environmental Protection
Agency announced that tests of air and water near the WTC site
"indicate that these vital resources are safe." The only problem
was, as the EPA's inspector general reported later, the agency "did
not have sufficient data and analyses to make such a blanket
statement." What's more, the inspector general said, "the White
House Council on Environmental Quality influenced, through the
collaboration process, the information that EPA communicated to the
public."
The 9-11 Commission did not address this topic in the body of its
final report. In a single footnote, the panel said it didn't have
the expertise to talk about the air testing, but let the White House
off the hook for influencing EPA press releases. Then–EPA head
Christine Whitman told the commission that she had met with a top
Bush economic adviser "regarding the need to get financial markets
open quickly," but denied any pressure to fudge the air quality
readings. A group of 12 people has sued the EPA over health problems
they blame on poor air quality near the site after the attacks.
Meanwhile, the EPA just last week approved a plan to test and clean
apartments south of Canal Street.
9. What exactly did Zacarias Moussaoui plan to do?
Was he the 20th hijacker? Or was he supposed to pilot a fifth plane
on September 11? Or was he a backup for Ziad Jarrah, the Flight 93
hijack pilot, whose disagreements with Mohammed Atta almost got him
dropped from the plot? Or was he a pilot for a "second wave" of
attacks, as captured Al Qaeda leader Khalid Shaikh Mohammed is
quoted saying in the 9-11 Commission report?
Last April, Moussaoui pled guilty to conspiracy charges, but claimed
that he had nothing to do with 9-11 and instead was planning a
separate attack to try to free Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman.
The Department of Justice hasn't said publicly exactly what
Moussaoui did—stating in court filings merely that Moussaoui
"participated" in the 9-11 plot—but it does want to execute him for
his alleged role
10. What's on those blanked-out pages?
"The Joint Inquiry Into Intelligence Community Activities Before and
After the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001," which was
released in late 2002, included 28 pages that were blanked out,
apparently concerning the possible role of Saudi government
officials. Those aren't the only blank spots in the public record.
As the Voice reported in October, there are multiple redactions in
the FDNY oral histories that in some cases seem to concern the
radios or suspicious activity near the WTC site before and during
the attacks.
Copyright Village Voice
Translate
this page
(In accordance with Title 17
U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to
those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational purposes.
Information Clearing House has no affiliation whatsoever with the
originator of this article nor is Information Clearing House
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.) |
