|
Iraqis want US out as soon as possible: US commander
12/25/05 "
Ninemsn" -- -- The top US military commander admitted
Sunday that Iraqis wanted US and other foreign troops to leave the
country "as soon as possible," and said US troop levels in Iraq were
now being re-assessed on a monthly basis.
The admission by Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Marine General Peter
Pace followed a decision by the Pentagon to reduce the current level
of 160,000 soldiers in Iraq by two army brigades, which amounts to
about 7,000 soldiers.
"Understandably, Iraqis themselves would prefer to have coalition
forces leave their country as soon as possible," Pace said in a
Christmas Day interview on Fox News Sunday. "They don't want us to
leave tomorrow, but they do want us to leave as soon as possible."
Some US foreign policy experts have expressed concern that a new
Iraqi government emerging from the December 15 parliamentary
elections could ask American troops to leave, but officials have
dismissed that forecast as unrealistic.
However, an opinion survey conducted in Iraq in October and November
by ABC News and a pool of other US and foreign media outlets showed
that despite some improvements in security and living standards, US
military operations in the country were increasingly unpopular.
Two-thirds of those polled said they opposed the presence of US and
coalition forces in Iraq, up 14 points from a similar survey taken
in February 2004.
Nearly 60 percent disapproved of the way the United States has
operated in Iraq since the war began in March 2003, with most of
those expressing "strong disapproval," the poll found.
When asked to suggest a timing for the US pullout, 26 percent said
US and other coalition forces should "leave now," while 19 percent
opted for a withdrawal after the Iraqis formed a new government
based on the results on the December 15 election.
Among those who support a delayed pullout, 31 percent said it should
happen after security is fully restored, while 16 percent favored
waiting until Iraqi security forces can operate independently,
according to the survey.
Pace denied the US Defense Department had prepared a plan that calls
for bringing the US troop level in Iraq below 100,000 by the end of
next year.
But he said force requirements in Iraq are being regularly assessed
by the top US military commander there, General George Casey.
"They do a very, very thorough analysis, literally once a month, in
great detail," Pace said. "They then determine how many troops they
need to get the job done."
But the chairman warned that "the enemy has a vote" in how fast US
troops were being drawn down, and if attacks intensified, "you could
see troop levels go up a little bit to handle that problem."
Two US soldiers were killed in Baghdad on Christmas Day by roadside
bombs, the military announced.
In a move largely interpreted as the beginning of a gradual drawdown
of US forces in Iraq, US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld announced
last week that one infantry brigade from Fort Riley, Kansas, and one
mechanised brigade from Germany will not be sent to Iraq as
initially planned.
The decision will reduce the number of US combat brigades in Iraq
from 17 to 15.
Meanwhile former secretary of state Colin Powell, who headed the
joint staff during the 1991 Gulf War, said Sunday he was certain
there would be fewer US troops in Iraq a year from now.
"I don't think we can sustain this level of presence with the force
size that we have," he said on ABC's "This Week" program.
To maintain the pre-election "baseline" of 138,000 troops in Iraq,
the US military will have to dramatically overhaul rules governing
deployments of the National Guard, whose members make up to 40
percent of the contingent.
Such an undertaking could be politically unrealistic, according to
members of congress.
© 1997- 2005 ninemsn Pty
Translate
this page
(In accordance with Title 17
U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to
those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational purposes.
Information Clearing House has no affiliation whatsoever with the
originator of this article nor is Information Clearing House
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.) |
