|
Bolivia: race and revolution
By Gwynne Dyer
12/25/05 -- --Bolivia has had more presidents by far than any other country in
South America, mainly because so many of them were overthrown long
before their terms ended. They were also all white, even though the
majority of Bolivia's population is "indigenous", descended wholly
or in part from the Indians whose ancestors already lived there as
subjects of the Incan empire at the time of the Spanish conquest
five centuries ago. So what are the odds that Evo Morales, Bolivia's
first indigenous president, will survive a full term of office?
Morales, who won an absolute majority of the votes in last Sunday's
presidential election, faces not only the usual hazards of life as
the president of South America's poorest country, but also the
threat of American intervention to overthrow him. As a socialist
whose declared goal is to "end the colonial state" and a leader of
the coca farmers who promises to lift the ban on growing coca leaf,
the crop from which cocaine is produced, he is deeply unpopular in
Washington.
In the past, policies that are unpopular in the United States have
proved to be bad for the president's health in a number of Latin
American countries. To those who argue that the Bush administration
is too deeply mired in the war in Iraq to contemplate acting against
Morales, the pessimists point out that the U.S. found the time to
organize the overthrow of the president in Chile in 1973 despite
being neck-deep in the Vietnam war. The election of Morales, they
fear, will finally focus Washington's attention on how countries all
over Latin America are rejecting U.S. tutelage.
The main target of Washington's wrath so far has been Venezuela,
whose president, Hugo Chavez, has built an unassailable domestic
base (he has won eleven elections and referendums in the past seven
years) by spending a lot of the country's oil revenues on the health
and education of poor Venezuelans. He has built a close relationship
with Cuba's Fidel Castro, whose regime has obsessed U.S.
administrations since the beginning of the 1960s, and he is now
providing Venezuelan oil at a discount to other Caribbean and
Central American countries (and even to poor Americans).
It is Chavez's incendiary language that gets the headlines -- last
month he called President George W. Bush a "madman, a killer and a
mass murderer" -- but his aim is serious: to free all of Latin
America from the grip of neo-liberal economic policies, indeed from
American influence in general. Last July's launch of Telesur, a new
television network whose aim is to provide an alternative to U.S.
based news and analysis for all Latin Americans, is a case in point.
It is based in Caracas and 70 percent financed by Venezuela, but it
is also backed by the governments of Argentina, Uruguay, Cuba and
Brazil.
The larger reality is that while the Bush administration has been
obsessed by its grandiose plans for reshaping the Middle East, the
real transformation has been happening in America's own "back yard".
Left-wing governments have come to power in Brazil and Argentina,
the two biggest countries of South America, and in a number of
smaller countries as well.
Like Chavez in Venezuela, they combine a commitment to the poor and
a rejection of the project for a U.S.-dominated "Free Trade Area of
the Americas" with a pragmatic respect for the rules of the free
market: no nationalizations (except for oil and gas) and more or
less balanced budgets. With this month's presidential election
victories by Michelle Bachelet in Chile and now by Evo Morales in
Bolivia, virtually all of South America except Colombia and Peru is
now part of this nascent left-wing bloc. But the continent is seeing
more than just a comeback in modern dress by the traditional left.
The Indians and part-Indians who form a downtrodden majority in most
of the Andean countries are staging their own comeback. They mostly
talk in terms of winning elections and re-writing constitutions, but
they basically share the view of Antauro Humala, leader of the
Etnocaceristas in Peru: "There are four races, black, white, yellow
and copper. We are the copper people and I want us to be recognized
as a race."
Hugo Chavez's Indian and black ancestry is written all over his
face, and explains much of his popularity with the majority of
mixed-race Venezuelans who felt excluded by the dominant white
minority in that oil-rich country. Evo Morales is even more clearly
a descendant of the Incas who ruled the central and southern Andes
before the white conquerors and settlers arrived, and he wants the
two-thirds of Bolivians who share his heritage to hold the power in
their own country at last.
It will get very fraught in Bolivia when Morales starts re-writing
the constitution to include the excluded, as he has already sworn to
do, but the ethnic solidarity among Bolivian Indians that has helped
him into power will also make it very hard for Washington to
overthrow him. So long as he avoids the civil war that some of the
more extreme members of the white minority may now try to provoke,
he will probably manage to serve a full term in office. What he does
with that term may change Bolivia beyond recognition.
Translate
this page
(In accordance with Title 17
U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to
those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational purposes.
Information Clearing House has no affiliation whatsoever with the
originator of this article nor is Information Clearing House
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.) |
