07/07/05 "The
Guardian " -- -- When Paul Bremer, the American pro
consul in Baghdad until June last year, arrived in Iraq soon
after the official end of hostilities, there was $6bn left over
from the UN Oil for Food Programme, as well as sequestered and
frozen assets, and at least $10bn from resumed Iraqi oil
exports. Under Security Council Resolution 1483, passed on May
22 2003, all these funds were transferred into a new account
held at the Federal Reserve Bank in New York, called the
Development Fund for Iraq (DFI), and intended to be spent by the
Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) "in a transparent manner
... for the benefit of the Iraqi people".
The US Congress also voted to spend $18.4bn of US taxpayers'
money on the redevelopment of Iraq. By June 28 last year,
however, when Bremer left Baghdad two days early to avoid
possible attack on the way to the airport, his CPA had spent up
to $20bn of Iraqi money, compared with $300m of US funds. The
"reconstruction" of Iraq is the largest American-led occupation
programme since the Marshall Plan - but the US government funded
the Marshall Plan. Defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Paul
Bremer have made sure that the reconstruction of Iraq is paid
for by the "liberated" country, by the Iraqis themselves.
The CPA maintained one fund of nearly $600m cash for which
there is no paperwork: $200m of it was kept in a room in one of
Saddam's former palaces. The US soldier in charge used to keep
the key to the room in his backpack, which he left on his desk
when he popped out for lunch. Again, this is Iraqi money, not US
funds.
The "financial irregularities" described in audit reports
carried out by agencies of the American government and auditors
working for the international community collectively give a
detailed insight into the mentality of the American occupation
authorities and the way they operated. Truckloads of dollars
were handed out for which neither they nor the recipients felt
they had to be accountable.
The auditors have so far referred more than a hundred
contracts, involving billions of dollars paid to American
personnel and corporations, for investigation and possible
criminal prosecution. They have also discovered that $8.8bn that
passed through the new Iraqi government ministries in Baghdad
while Bremer was in charge is unaccounted for, with little
prospect of finding out where it has gone. A further $3.4bn
appropriated by Congress for Iraqi development has since been
siphoned off to finance "security".
Although Bremer was expected to manage Iraqi funds in a
transparent manner, it was only in October 2003, six months
after the fall of Saddam, that an International Advisory and
Monitoring Board (IAMB) was established to provide independent,
international financial oversight of CPA spending. (This board
includes representatives from the United Nations, the World
Bank, the IMF and the Arab Fund for Economic and Social
Development.)
The IAMB first spent months trying to find auditors
acceptable to the US. The Bahrain office of KPMG was finally
appointed in April 2004. It was stonewalled.
"KPMG has encountered resistance from CPA staff regarding the
submission of information required to complete our procedures,"
they wrote in an interim report. "Staff have indicated ... that
cooperation with KPMG's undertakings is given a low priority."
KPMG had one meeting at the Iraqi Ministry of Finance; meetings
at all the other ministries were repeatedly postponed. The
auditors even had trouble getting passes to enter the Green
Zone.
There appears to have been good reason for the Americans to
stall. At the end of June 2004, the CPA would be disbanded and
Bremer would leave Iraq. There was no way the Bush
administration would want independent auditors to publish a
report into the financial propriety of its Iraqi administration
while the CPA was still in existence and Bremer at its head
still answerable to the press. So the report was published in
July.
The auditors found that the CPA didn't keep accounts of the
hundreds of millions of dollars of cash in its vault, had
awarded contracts worth billions of dollars to American firms
without tender, and had no idea what was happening to the money
from the Development Fund for Iraq (DFI), which was being spent
by the interim Iraqi government ministries.
This lack of transparency has led to allegations of
corruption. An Iraqi hospital administrator told me that when he
came to sign a contract, the American army officer representing
the CPA had crossed out the original price and doubled it. The
Iraqi protested that the original price was enough. The American
officer explained that the increase (more than $1m) was his
retirement package.
When the Iraqi Governing Council asked Bremer why a contract
to repair the Samarah cement factory was costing $60m rather
than the agreed $20m, the American representative reportedly
told them that they should be grateful the coalition had saved
them from Saddam. Iraqis who were close to the Americans, had
access to the Green Zone or held prominent posts in the new
government ministries were also in a position personally to
benefit enormously. Iraqi businessmen complain endlessly that
they had to offer substantial bribes to Iraqi middlemen just to
be able to bid for CPA contracts. Iraqi ministers' relatives got
top jobs and fat contracts.
Further evidence of lack of transparency comes from a series
of audits and reports carried out by the CPA's own inspector
general's office (CPAIG). Set up in January 2004, it reports to
Congress. Its auditors, accountants and criminal investigators
often found themselves sitting alone at cafe tables in the Green
Zone, shunned by their CPA compatriots. Their audit, published
in July 2004, found that the American contracts officers in the
CPA and Iraqi ministries "did not ensure that ... contract files
contained all the required documents, a fair and reasonable
price was paid for the services received, contractors were
capable of meeting delivery schedules, or that contractors were
paid in accordance with contract requirements".
Pilfering was rife. Millions of dollars in cash went missing
from the Iraqi Central Bank. Between $11m and $26m worth of
Iraqi property sequestered by the CPA was unaccounted for. The
payroll was padded with hundreds of ghost employees. Millions of
dollars were paid to contractors for phantom work. Some
$3,379,505 was billed, for example, for "personnel not in the
field performing work" and "other improper charges" on just one
oil pipeline repair contract.
Most of the 69 criminal investigations the CPAIG instigated
related to alleged theft, fraud, waste, assault and extortion.
It also investigated "a number of other cases that, because of
their sensitivity, cannot be included in this report". One such
case may have arisen when 19 billion new Iraqi dinars, worth
about £6.5m, was found on a plane in Lebanon that had been sent
there by the American-appointed Iraqi interior minister.
At the same time, the IAMB discovered that Iraqi oil exports
were unmetered. Neither the Iraqi State Oil Marketing
Organisation nor the American authorities could give a
satisfactory explanation for this. "The only reason you wouldn't
monitor them is if you don't want anyone else to know how much
is going through," one petroleum executive told me.
Officially, Iraq exported $10bn worth of oil in the first
year of the American occupation. Christian Aid has estimated
that up to $4bn more may have been exported and is unaccounted
for. If so, this would have created an off-the-books fund that
both the Americans and their Iraqi allies could use with
impunity to cover expenditures they would rather keep secret -
among them the occupation costs, which were rising far beyond
what the Bush administration could comfortably admit to Congress
and the international community.
In the few weeks before Bremer left Iraq, the CPA handed out
more than $3bn in new contracts to be paid for with Iraqi funds
and managed by the US embassy in Baghdad. The CPA inspector
general, now called the Special Inspector General for Iraq
Reconstruction (Sigir), has just released an audit report on the
way the embassy has dealt with that responsibility. The auditors
reviewed the files of 225 contracts totalling $327m to see if
the embassy "could identify the current value of paid and unpaid
contract obligations".
It couldn't. "Our review showed that financial records ...
understated payments made by $108,255,875" and "overstated
unpaid obligations by $119,361,286". The auditors also reviewed
the paperwork of a further 300 contracts worth $332.9m: "Of 198
contract files reviewed, 154 did not contain evidence that goods
and services were received, 169 did not contain invoices, and 14
did not contain evidence of payment."
Clearly, the Americans see no need to account for spending
Iraqis' national income now any more than they did when Bremer
was in charge. Neither the embassy chief of mission nor the US
military commander replied to the auditors' invitation to
comment. Instead, the US army contracting commander lamely
pointed out that "the peaceful conditions envisioned in the
early planning continue to elude the reconstruction efforts".
This is a remarkable understatement. It's also an admission that
Americans can't be expected to do their sums when they are
spending other people's money to finance a war.
Lack of accountability does not stop with the Americans. In
January this year, the Sigir issued a report detailing evidence
of fraud, corruption and waste by the Iraqi Interim Government
when Bremer was in charge. They found that $8.8bn - the entire
Iraqi Interim Government spending from October 2003 through June
2004 - was not properly accounted for. The Iraqi Office of
Budget and Management at one point had only six staff, all of
them inexperienced, and most of the ministries had no budget
departments. Iraq's newly appointed ministers and their senior
officials were free to hand out hundreds of millions of dollars
in cash as they pleased, while American "advisers" looked on.
"CPA personnel did not review and compare financial,
budgetary and operational performance to planned or expected
results," the auditors explained. One ministry gave out $430m in
contracts without its CPA advisers seeing any of the paperwork.
Another claimed to be paying 8,206 guards, but only 602 could be
found. There is simply no way of knowing how much of the $8.8bn
has gone to pay for private militias and into private pockets.
"It's remarkable that the inspector general's office could
have produced even a draft report with so many misconceptions
and inaccuracies," Bremer said in his reply to the Sigir report.
"At liberation, the Iraqi economy was dead in the water. So
CPA's top priority was to get the economy going."
The Sigir has responded by releasing another audit this
April, an investigation into the way Bremer's CPA managed cash
payments from Iraqi funds in just one part of Iraq, the region
around Hillah: "During the course of the audit, we identified
deficiencies in the control of cash ... of such magnitude as to
require prompt attention. Those deficiencies were so significant
that we were precluded from accomplishing our stated
objectives." They found that CPA headquarters in Baghdad "did
not maintain full control and accountability for approximately
$119.9m", and that agents in the field "cannot properly account
for or support over $96.6m in cash and receipts". The agents
were mostly Americans in Iraq on short-term contracts. One
agent's account balance was "overstated by $2,825,755, and the
error went undetected". Another agent was given $25m cash for
which Bremer's office "acknowledged not having any supporting
documentation". Of more than $23m given to another agent, there
are only records for $6,306,836 paid to contractors.
Many of the American agents submitted their paperwork only
hours before they headed to the airport. Two left Iraq without
accounting for $750,000 each, which has never been found. CPA
head office cleared several agents' balances of between $250,000
and $12m without any receipts. One agent who did submit
receipts, on being told that he still owed $1,878,870, turned up
three days later with exactly that amount. The auditors thought
that "this suggests that the agent had a reserve of cash",
pointing out that if his original figures had been correct, he
would have accounted to the CPA for approximately $3.8m more
than he had been given in the first place, which "suggests that
the receipt documents provided to the DFI account manager were
unreliable".
So where did the money go? You can't see it in Hillah. The
schools, hospitals, water supply and electricity, all of which
were supposed to benefit from these funds, are in ruins. The
inescapable conclusion is that many of the American paying
agents grabbed large bundles of cash for themselves and made
sweet deals with their Iraqi contacts.
And so it continues. The IAMB's most recent audit of Iraqi
government spending talks of "incomplete accounting", "lack of
documented justification for limited competition for contracts
at the Iraqi ministries", "possible misappropriation of oil
revenues", "significant difficulties in ensuring completeness
and accuracy of Iraqi budgets and controls over expenditures"
and "non-deposit of proceeds of export sales of petroleum
products into the appropriate accounts in contravention of UN
Security Council Resolution 1483".
In the absence of any meaningful accountability, Iraqis have
no way of knowing how much of the nation's wealth is being used
for reconstruction and how much is being handed out to
ministers' and civil servants' friends and families or funnelled
into secret overseas bank accounts. Given that many Ba'athists
are now back in government, some of that money may even be
financing the insurgents.
Both Saddam and the US profited handsomely during his reign.
He controlled Iraq's wealth while most of Iraq's oil went to
Californian refineries to provide cheap petrol for American
voters. US corporations, like those who enjoyed Saddam's favour,
grew rich. Today, the system is much the same: the oil goes to
California, and the new Iraqi government spends the national
wealth with impunity.
· Bremer maintained one slush fund of nearly $600m in
cash for which there is no paperwork: $200m of it was kept in a
room in one of Saddam's former palaces
· 19 billion new Iraqi dinars, worth about £6.5m, was
found on a plane in Lebanon that had been sent there by the new
Iraqi interior minister
· One ministry claimed to be paying 8,206 guards, but
only 602 could be found
· One American agent was given $23m to spend on
restructuring; only $6m is accounted for
This is an edited version of an article that appears in the
current issue of the London Review of Books (lrb).