|
Does Senator Joseph
Lieberman Believe Americans Are Fools?
By
James J. David
02/22/02 -- -- US President George W.
Bush last month accused Baghdad, along with
Iran and North Korea, of making up an "axis
of evil" bent on backing international
terrorism and developing weapons of mass
destruction. It seems that Senator Joseph
Lieberman has convinced the President that
Bagdad is a threat to the United States and
launching a military attack seems to be the
only alternative. Other close advisors such
as Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul
Wolfowitz and the Defense Chairman of the
Advisory Board, Richard Perle, are also
calling for the bombing of Iraq as the only
sure method of destroying this threat.
When Joseph Lieberman says that it's
necessary to attack Iraq because Iraq is a
threat to the United States, does he really
think that smart Americans believe this?
Does he really think that Iraq would attack
the United States? Senator Lieberman must
take you and me for a fool. Let me tell you
why this is utter nonsense. No one can
launch an intercontinental ballistic missile
without the United States instantly knowing
its exact location. Therefore, any small
country that launches a missile in our
direction will know that it is committing
national suicide. The warheads on just one
of our submarines could cause these small
countries literally to cease to exist. How
long did it take the United States to defeat
Iraq in the Gulf War? The last time I looked
it was 38 seconds, and that was with
conventional warfare, not nuclear, which the
United States has more of than all nations
combined times 1000.
If Iraq hit the United States with one or
two missiles, despite the loss of life,
would strategically be nothing more than a
pinprick. It would be like poking a sleeping
bear. All you would do is make the bear mad.
Therefore, it is extremely unlikely that
Iraq or Iran, or for that matter North Korea
would trade national suicide for inflicting
minimal damage on the United States. And
building a force of ICBMs large enough to be
[a] real threat is beyond the economic
capabilities of those three countries.
So why did Senator Joseph Lieberman convince
President Bush to focus on Iraq as a threat?
I'll tell you why. It's not the United
States that Senator Lieberman is concerned
about. We know that Iraq is not a threat to
the United States. Iraq is a threat to
Israel. Senator Lieberman and other
pro-Israelis in Washington don't want anyone
else in the Middle East to own Nuclear
weapons except Israel. It's Israel, not the
United States, that Lieberman is concerned
about. And he is willing to risk American
lives and American money to insure that
Israel is the super power in the Middle
East. Isn't it odd that while Lieberman is
pushing for a bombing of Iraq, it's the
Israelis who are inflicting most of the
casualties in Middle East with its current
bombing campaign. In just the last 2 days
the Israelis have killed 29 Palestinians,
and most of them are innocent civilians
including children. Iraq hasn't killed
anyone since the Gulf War, and that's been
11 years ago. In just the last 17 months the
Israelis have killed over 900 Palestinians
and have demolished more than 300 homes
causing more than 1500 children to become
homeless. And the Israelis have been doing
this with F-16 fighter jets, M1A1 Abram
tanks, 155mm howitzers, Chaparral and
Sidewinder missiles, and Apache and Cobra
attack helicopters all supplied by the good
'ole United States.
When President Bush talks about the threat
of countries with weapons of mass
destruction, he always adds ``and our
allies.'' Iraq and Iran are not a threat to
the United States or to Europe. They are a
threat to Israel. North Korea is not a
threat to the United States, but the
Israelis greatly fear that North Korea will
sell missiles to Iran and Iraq. So when
Senator Lieberman says that Iraq is a threat
to the United States, he really means that
Iraq is a threat to Israel. His loyalty
isn't so much with the United States; its
more with Israel, and that's not right. And
you know what? I'll bet most of the people,
including President Bush already understands
that, but are too scared to challenge him.
After all, to challenge or criticize Israel
is political suicide. Too many politicians
have learned the hard way in that
criticizing Israel is like turning the
lights off to one's political career. And in
the meantime, partly to justify this
boondoggle, the United States is embarking
on a reckless foreign policy that is more
likely to produce war than peace. We should
be talking to the Iraqis, the Iranians and
the North Koreans rather than making
reckless statements on global television
that amount to a declaration of war. It can
prove to be a deadly mistake to start
believing your own deceptions and
propaganda.
We are not the Big Daddy Boss of the world,
and just because others disagree with our
policies or decline to jump when we tell
them to jump doesn't mean they are our
enemies. And that's why the United States is
and will be so vulnerable for more attacks
on its own soil. They will be vulnerable and
they will be targeted, unless America wakes
up. It's time for all of us to know the
truth and act accordingly.
James J. David is a retired Brigadier
General and a graduate of the US Army's
Command and General Staff College, and the
National Security Course, National Defense
University, Washington DC. He served nearly
3 years of Army active duty in and around
the Middle East from 1967-1969. |