|
UK: Military action on
a nuclear Iran not inevitable
By Madeline Chambers
02/08/06 -- LONDON (Reuters)
- Military action against Iran is not inevitable even if the
Islamic state develops the technology to build a nuclear
bomb, British Foreign Minister Jack Straw said on Wednesday.
Straw, pressed by a parliamentary committee about the
possibility of Western powers taking military action against
Iran over its atomic ambitions, repeated that such a step
was not on the agenda and insisted he would pursue
diplomacy.
"I don't believe that even if Iran were in that position
(of having the capability to make nuclear weapons) that
there would be nothing the international community could do
about it short of ... military action," Straw told the
committee.
He drew a comparison with reclusive North Korea, which
the West suspects already has atomic weapons.
"There is a process which I am reasonably confident will
lead to a resolution by non-military means," he said.
Amid international concern that Iran wants to make a
nuclear bomb, the U.N. nuclear watchdog on Saturday voted to
report Iran to the Security Council, a move which could
eventually lead to sanctions.
Straw declined to say what action the Security Council
might take, but it will do nothing before an International
Atomic Energy Agency report due next month.
Although the West was very suspicious that Iran wants to
develop nuclear weapons, there was no proof, said Straw.
Iran denies it wants to build arms and says it needs nuclear
technology for power generation.
"I am conscious of the fact, not least because of the
experience in respect of Iraq, we have to be very precise
about what we are claiming," said Straw.
Before the 2003 invasion of Iraq, Britain and the United
States argued that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass
destruction, a claim that proved unfounded and raised major
questions about the grounds for war.
The level of international concern over Iran's nuclear
ambitions would continue as discussions start about what
action to take next, Straw said.
"It is always possible that there will be disagreements
in the Security Council but I think they are unlikely," he
said.
He argued that Russia and China would not have voted for
the resolution at the IAEA only to veto proposals put
forward at the Security Council by France and the United
Kingdom. |