|
The CIA's 'Black Sites'
What are we going to do with the secret prisoners who cannot be
tried in our courts?
By Nat Hentoff
02/26/06 "Village
Voice" The CIA's top counterterrorism official
[Robert Grenier] was fired last week because he opposed detaining Al
Qaeda suspects in secret prisons abroad, sending them to other
countries for interrogation, and using forms of torture such as "waterboarding,"
[making a prisoner believe he is about to be drowned] intelligence
sources have claimed. The Sunday Times, London, February 12
For more than three years, I've been reporting on what has been
increasingly, but fragmentarily, revealed about secret CIA prisons
around the world. On September 17, 2001, the president, in a
classified order, gave the CIA these "special powers" (as Attorney
General Alberto Gonzales agreed during his confirmation hearings).
These "black sites"—as they are called in CIA, White House, and
Justice Department files— escaped attempted congressional oversight
until December 2005. But in the National Defense Authorization Act,
the Senate finally called for regular reports on where those prisons
are, what plans there are for the ultimate release of their
prisoners, and "a description of the interrogation procedures used."
Ted Kennedy and John Kerry introduced the resolution.
A similar December requirement was passed by the House (226 to 187)
in a nonbinding resolution to urge the House and Senate negotiators
to shine a shaft of sunlight on these "dark sites" in the final
National Defense Authorization Act for 2006. But secretly, both the
Senate and House resolutions were killed by the conference
committee.
This February, Human Rights Watch, the ACLU, Human Rights First, and
Amnesty International urged the House International Relations
Committee to support three new resolutions of inquiry into American
use of torture, citing the fact that "there is still a strong
perception in many parts of the world that the United States
continues to facilitate or willfully ignore torture by rendering
individuals to countries where they are likely to be tortured, and
by holding detainees in secret locations closed to the International
Committee of the Red Cross." (Emphasis added.)
But on February 10, in a party line vote, the House International
Relations Committee defeated all three resolutions.
There has been hardly any notice in the press or anywhere else about
these congressional setbacks as part of the Bush administration's
continued success in suppressing news of what actually goes on in
those "black sites" in the name of the United States and its
citizens.
As I have noted in previous columns, there has been a debate for
more than two years inside the CIA about the legality of these
secret prisons and how to eventually dispose of the prisoners. They
cannot be tried in American courts because they have been wholly
denied due process under our constitution and so are wrongfully
held.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Two years ago, FBI veteran Jack Cloonan, who had been the senior
agent on the FBI's bin Laden squad in New York and later was in
charge of investigating Al Qaeda master planner Khalid Shaikh
Mohammed (now in some CIA "black site"), asked on ABC's Nightline:
"What are we going to do with these people [in the CIA secret
cells]? . . . Are they going to disappear? Are they stateless? . . .
What are we going to explain to people when they start asking
questions about where they are? Are they dead? Are they alive? What
oversight does Congress have?"
The present answer to Jack Cloonan's last question is this: There is
no congressional oversight. Congress has been blocked—by its
Republican leadership, the president, Donald Rumsfeld, and CIA chief
Porter Goss—from having any oversight at all. The constitutional
separation of powers has also fallen into a black hole.
There is, however, a quick look into one of those secret prisons in
a December 19, 2005, Human Rights Watch report, "U.S. Operated
Secret 'Dark Prison' in Kabul."
Eight "detainees" now being held at Guantánamo, another extralegal
U.S. prison, have told their attorneys what it was like when they
were individually held, at various times between 2002 and 2004, in a
secret U.S. facility for more than six weeks before being
transferred to Guantánamo. That secret prison was apparently closed
after the transfer. This is their story, as told in the HRW report:
"The detainees, who called the facility the 'dark prison' or 'prison
of darkness,' said they were. . . shackled to rings bolted into the
walls of their cells, deprived of food and drinking water. . . for
days at a time . . . and kept in total darkness with load rap,
heavy-metal music, or other sounds blaring for weeks at a time. . .
. Some detainees said they were shackled in a manner that made it
impossible for them to lie down or sleep."
One of the prisoners added that he was put in "an underground
place," and "during the interrogations, he says, an interrogator
threatened him with rape."
Ethiopia-born Benyam Mohammed, who grew up in Britain, told his
attorney, in English, "[At one point] I was chained to the rails [of
my cell] for a fortnight. . . . The CIA worked on people, including
me, day and night. . . . Plenty lost their minds. I could hear
people knocking their heads against the walls and the doors,
screaming their heads off."
Bush, Rumsfeld, Gonzales, et al. regularly intone, in chorus, that
the U.S. does not torture and always acts within the law. But if the
fearful facts in the darkness in those CIA prisons are ever
documented by an independent prosecutor in a future administration,
it will finally be proved that, as Human Rights Watch emphasizes,
the CIA is responsible—along with the president who gave it "special
powers"—for "serious violations of U.S. criminal law, such as the
War Crimes Act and the Anti-Torture Statute. . . . The mistreatment
of detainees also violates the [International] Convention Against
Torture and the International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights, both of which the United States has ratified, and the laws
of war."
There is a rising focus around the country on this year's midterm
elections. During the campaigning, will there be any mention of the
screams in the CIA's underground prisons of darkness? And if there
is, how many Americans will care enough to be repelled by their own
silent, passive complicity in the growing moral darkness of this
nation's leadership?
Copyright © 2006 Village Voice Media
Translate
this page
(In accordance with Title 17
U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to
those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational purposes.
Information Clearing House has no affiliation whatsoever with the
originator of this article nor is Information Clearing House
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.) |
