Defeat is victory. Death is life
By Robert Fisk
Independent" -- -- Everyone in the Middle East
rewrites history, but never before have we had a US administration
so wilfully, dishonestly and ruthlessly reinterpreting tragedy as
success, defeat as victory, death as life - helped, I have to add,
by the compliant American press. I'm reminded not so much of Vietnam
as of the British and French commanders of the First World War who
repeatedly lied about military victory over the Kaiser as they
pushed hundreds of thousands of their men through the butchers'
shops of the Somme, Verdun and Gallipoli. The only difference now is
that we are pushing hundreds of thousands of Arabs though the
butchers' shops - and don't even care.
Last week's visit to Beirut by one of the blindest of George Bush's
bats - his Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice - was indicative of
the cruelty that now pervades Washington. She brazenly talked about
the burgeoning "democracies" of the Middle East while utterly
ignoring the bloodbaths in Iraq and the growing sectarian tensions
of Lebanon, Egypt and Saudi Arabia. Perhaps the key to her
indifference can be found in her evidence to the Senate Committee on
International Affairs where she denounced Iran as "the greatest
strategic challenge" facing the US in the region, because Iran uses
policies that "contradict the nature of the kind of Middle East
sought by the United States".
As Bouthaina Shaaban, one of the brightest of Syria's not always
very bright team of government ministers, noted: "What is the nature
of the kind of Middle East sought by the United States? Should
Middle East states adapt themselves to that nature, designed oceans
away?" As Maureen Dowd, the best and only really worthwhile
columnist on the boring New York Times, observed this month, Bush
"believes in self-determination only if he's doing the determining
... The Bushies are more obsessed with snooping on Americans than
fathoming how other cultures think and react." And conniving with
rogue regimes, too, Dowd might have added.
Take Donald Rumsfeld, the reprehensible man who helped to kick off
the "shock and awe" mess that has now trapped more than 100,000
Americans in the wastes of Iraq. He's been taking a leisurely trip
around North Africa to consult some of America's nastiest dictators,
among them President Zine el-Abidine Ben Ali of Tunisia, the man
with the largest secret service in the Arab world and whose
policemen have perfected the best method of gleaning information
from suspected "terrorists": to hold them down and stuff
bleach-soaked rags into their mouths until they have almost drowned.
The Tunisians learned this from the somewhat cruder methods of the
Algerians next door whose government death squads slaughtered quite
a few of the 150,000 victims of the recent war against the
Islamists. The Algerian lads - and I've interviewed a few of them
after their nightmares persuaded them to seek asylum in London -
would strap their naked victims to a ladder and, if the "chiffon"
torture didn't work, they'd push a tube down the victim's throat and
turn on a water tap until the prisoner swelled up like a balloon.
There was a special department (at the Chateauneuf police station,
in case Donald Rumsfeld wants to know) for torturing women, who were
inevitably raped before being dispatched by an execution squad.
All this I mention because Rumsfeld's also been cosying up to the
Algerians. On a visit to Algiers this month, he announced that "the
United States and Algeria have a multifaceted relationship. It
involves political and economic as well as military-to-military
co-operation. And we very much value the co-operation we are
receiving in counter-terrorism..." Yes, I imagine the "chiffon"
technique is easy to learn, the abuse of prisoners, too - just like
Abu Ghraib, for example, which now seems to have been the fault of
journalists rather than America's thugs.
Rumsfeld's latest pronouncements have included a defence of the
Pentagon's system of buying favourable news stories in Iraq with
bribes - "non-traditional means to provide accurate information" was
his fantasy description of this latest attempt to obscure the
collapse of the American regime in Baghdad - and an attack on our
reporting of the Abu Ghraib tortures. "Consider for a moment the
vast quantity of column inches and hours of television devoted to
the detainee abuse [sic] at Abu Ghraib. Compare that to the volume
of coverage and condemnation associated with, say, the discovery of
Saddam Hussein's mass graves, which were filled with hundreds of
thousands of innocent Iraqis."
Let's expose this whopping lie. We were exposing Saddam's vile
regime, especially his use of gas, as long ago as 1983. I was
refused a visa to Iraq by Saddam's satraps for exposing their vile
tortures at - Abu Ghraib. And what was Donald Rumsfeld doing?
Visiting Baghdad, grovelling before Saddam, to whom he did not
mention the murders and mass graves, which he knew about, and
pleading with the Beast of Baghdad to reopen the US embassy in Iraq.
With the usual press courtiers in tow, Rumsfeld has no problems,
witness George Melloan's recent interview with the Beast of
Washington in his Boeing 737: "He generously spares me time for a
chat about defence strategy. Bright sunlight streams in and lights
his face ... Sitting across from him at a desk high above the
clouds, one wonders if the ability of this modern Jove to call down
lightning on transgressors will be equal to the tasks ahead."
And so myth-making and tragedy go hand in hand. Iraq's monumental
catastrophe has become routine, shapeless, an incipient "civil war".
Note how the American framework of disaster is now being portrayed
as an Iraqi vs Iraqi war, as if the huge and brutal US occupation
has nothing to do with the appalling violence in Iraq. They blow up
each other's mosques? They just don't want to get on. We told them
to have a non-sectarian government and they refused. That, I
suspect, will be the get-out line when the next deluge overwhelms
the Americans in Iraq.
Winston Churchill, when the Iraqis staged their insurgency against
British rule in 1920, called Iraq "an ungrateful volcano". But let's
just sit back and enjoy the view. Democracy is coming to the Middle
East. People are enjoying more liberties. History doesn't matter,
only the future. And the future for the people of the Middle East is
becoming darker and bloodier by the day. I guess it just depends
whether "Jove" is up to his job when all that bright sunlight
streams in and lights his face.
© 2006 Independent News and Media Limited
(In accordance with Title 17
U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to
those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational purposes.
Information Clearing House has no affiliation whatsoever with the
originator of this article nor is Information Clearing House
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)