|
Govt. Eyes Error That Cost U.S. Billions
By H. JOSEF HEBERT
Associated Press Writer
03/02/06 "AP" -- -- WASHINGTON - How it happened or who's
responsible is a mystery eight years after the fact. But what may
have been a simple error — or perhaps something more ominous — has
given a multimillion-dollar windfall to a group of oil and gas
companies and could cost the government billions of dollars more in
the years to come.
The Interior Department disclosed Wednesday that a provision was
mysteriously deleted from hundreds of federal drilling leases in the
late 1990s that would have required producers to pay royalties, once
prices reached a certain level, on oil or gas taken from deep waters
of the Gulf of Mexico.
In 1995, Congress exempted deep-water oil from royalty payments to
spur development. But a price threshold was included in leases
issued in 1996 and 1997 and again in leases sold in each year since
2000 that reinstates the royalties if market prices reach a certain
level.
For some reason the language "was inadvertently dropped" from an
addendum attached to more than 1,100 leases the Interior
Department's Minerals Management Service issued for 1998 and 1999,
Walter Cruickshank, the agency's deputy director, told a House
Government Reform subcommittee Wednesday.
He said officials have not been able to determine who made the
change, although he said it had to have been a human act, not a
computer glitch.
"It is clear that there is no record telling people to take the
language out," he said, and it was widely known that the department
wanted the price threshold restriction in any oil and gas leases as
a matter of policy.
In the late 1990s, when oil prices were well below the threshold,
the issue may not have attracted attention.
Rep. Darrell Issa (news, bio, voting record), R-Calif., the
subcommittee chairman, called the whole matter "suspicious."
"This is a $7 billion word processing error," Issa told reporters.
He said some of the leases issued during those two years could
remain in effect for as long as 85 years, so the government will be
unable to collect royalty payments from oil and gas taken from those
leases for decades to come.
While providing no specific number, Cruickshank said the government
already has lost "several hundred million" dollars in royalty
payments from the 1998-99 leases because they lacked the threshold
language. If prices remain high, lost royalties "will be in the
billions of dollars," he acknowledged.
The price threshold where royalties must be paid changes yearly.
Most recently it was set at about $34 a barrel for oil and $4.34 per
thousand cubic feet for natural gas, according to Interior
officials. The price of oil Wednesday on the New York Mercantile
Exchange was nearly $62 a barrel and the government estimates it
will remain in the $50-a-barrel range for years to come. Natural gas
prices have been in the $9-per-thousand-cubic-feet range.
Issa said he planned to seek more documents from the Minerals
Management Service, and said the issue may need to be investigated
by the Justice Department to determine whether there was any
deliberate wrongdoing.
When Congress enacted the royalty relief program for deep-water
exploration and development, it was embraced by the Clinton
administration as a way to spur more energy production in areas
where the technology and prospects of success were still somewhat
uncertain.
Cruickshank said he had no explanation for why the threshold
requirement was taken out of the lease language when an addendum was
changed for the 1998-99 leases to reflect other regulatory changes.
"Everyone knew the (price) threshold applied" but people didn't
focus on it because of low market prices at the time, said
Cruickshank, who joined the agency in 1988 but was not involved in
writing leases.
The mystery surrounding the 1998-99 leases is part of a broader
question over whether any royalty relief should be given to the
industry, given high oil and gas prices and huge industry profits.
The Interior Department estimates that as much as $66 billion worth
of oil and natural gas that will be taken from the Gulf of Mexico
between now and 2011 falls under the royalty relief law enacted by
Congress in 1995. Much of that oil and gas will be subject to
royalties under the price threshold provision, which is included in
leases other than those issued in 1998-99.
Several oil and gas companies have challenged the legality of the
threshold requirement in leases issued before 2001. Kerr McGee, a
major natural gas producer, has given notice to the Interior
Department that it will soon file a lawsuit arguing that the
threshold provisions are illegal.
The Interior Department will "vigorously defend" the ability to
impose royalties under a price threshold provision, said
Cruickshank. "There's a lot of money at stake."
On the Net: - Minerals Management Service:
http://www.mms.gov/
Copyright © 2006 The Associated Press.
Click below to post a comment on this article
Translate
this page
(In accordance with Title 17
U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to
those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational purposes.
Information Clearing House has no affiliation whatsoever with the
originator of this article nor is Information Clearing House
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.) |
