|
Philippines: The Killing Fields Of Asia
By
James Petras and Robin Eastman-Abaya
03/14/06 "ICH"
-- -- Since President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo joined
the US global “War on Terrorism”, the Philippines has become the
site of an on-going undeclared war against peasant and union
activists, progressive political dissidents and lawmakers, human
rights lawyers and activists, women leaders and a wide range of
print and broadcast journalists. Because of the links between the
Army, the regime and the death squads, political assassinations take
place in an atmosphere of absolute impunity. The vast majority of
the attacks occur in the countryside and provincial towns. The reign
of terror in the Philippines is of similar scope and depth as in
Colombia. Unlike Colombia, the rampaging state terrorism has not
drawn sufficient attention from international public opinion.
Between 2001 and 2006 hundreds of killings, disappearances, death
threats and cases of torture have been documented by the independent
human rights center ,KARAPATAN , and the church-linked Ecumenical
Institute for Labor Education and Research. Since Macapagal Arroyo
came to power in 2001 there have been 400 documented extrajudicial
killings. In 2004, 63 were killed and in 2005, 179 were assassinated
and another 46 disappeared and presumed dead. So far in the first 2
½ months of 2006 there have been 26 documented political
assassinations.
An analysis of the class and social background of the victims of
this systematic state terror in 2005 demonstrates that the largest
sector, about 70, have been peasants and peasant leaders involved in
land and farm labor disputes. The military has invariably accused
the murdered and disappeared peasants of links to or sympathy with
the communist guerrillas or Muslim separatists. The victims include
members of the national farmers’ association, Kilusang Magbubukid ng
Pilipinas (KMP), as well as Igorot, Agta and Moro indigenous
minority peasant leaders involved in protecting their lands. One
notorious massacre occurred in late November 2005 when 47 peasants
and their legal representatives held an open, public meeting over a
land dispute in Palo, Leyte in the Visayas. A large force of
soldiers surrounded and attacked the meeting killing 9 peasants
outright and arresting over a dozen. An additional 18 ‘disappeared’
and are presumed dead. The ‘Palo Massacre’ of the members of the San
Agustin Farmers Beneficiaries Cooperative and Alang-Alang Small
Farmers Association was at first presented by the armed forces as a
military encounter with the New Peoples Army and a few homemade
weapons were planted on the victims. In this, as in all other cases,
none of the perpetrators have been punished and there has been no
official investigation.
Workers and labor leaders form the next largest group of victims of
assassination (at least 18) not including the disappeared and
presumed dead. Members of a national labor federation, Kilusan Mayo
Uno (May First Movement), Nestle’s Worker’s Union, Central
Azucareara de Tarlac, Negros Federation of Sugar Workers, a leader
of the Department of Agrarian Reform Employee Association, regional
college employee union leaders and various militants in both the
electrical company and bus company employee unions were murdered in
2005.
Earlier in 2005, 26 unarmed Muslim detainees in a military prison in
Manila were shot protesting against their prolonged and arbitrary
detention, lack of a trial date and horrific prison conditions.
These men were mostly vendors and displaced peasants and fishermen
living with their families in Manila. They were accused , but never
convicted, of membership in the ‘Abu Sayaf’ kidnapping gang.
Seven print and radio journalists and writers were killed in 2005 as
well as seven attorneys and judges involved in human rights, labor
and land dispute cases. Among the religious community, there were 3
targeted assassinations of clergy and 7 church workers, all involved
in advocacy work with the poor, peasants, workers and national
minorities.
This listing of killings in 2005 doesn’t included attempted
assassinations, illegal detention and torture and unreported
disappearances. The victims were killed by death squads controlled
by the military with the aim of protecting the power of the large
landowners and land grabbers, timber and mining barons and company
bosses with the connivance of the regime.
Another important group of victims, which overlaps with peasants and
workers associations, are the 83 leaders and members of the popular
left political party, Bayan Muna (The People First) and its ‘party
list’ affiliates. Most were systematically murdered in the provinces
outside of Metro Manila between 2001-2005 (67 in 2005 alone).
Leaders and coordinators of allied party-list groups, such as the
women’s party Gabriela and the urban poor people’s party, Anakpawis
(Toiling Masses), have been murdered, disappeared or wounded.
Elected officials from Bayan Muna, such a Tarlac City councilman,
Abelardo Ladera , were shot in broad daylight, prompting defiant
provincial funeral marches. His killing followed the notorious 2004
massacre of hacienda union workers in Tarlac and the subsequent
systematic elimination of witnesses.
A breakdown of the 66 death squad killings of members and supporters
of the progressive political parties in 2005 include 33 from
militant urban poor peoples party Anakpawis and 30 from Bayan Muna.
Five members of Anakpawis and 3 from Bayan Muna have ‘disappeared’
and are presumed dead in 2005. So far three Bayan Muna officials
have been assassinated in the first 10 weeks of 2006.
Since 2003, the Philippines became the 2nd most dangerous country
for journalists after Iraq because of the staggering number of
reporters killed and disappeared by death squads. Most recently a
radio reporter involved in exposing abuses at a local mine was
kidnapped by death squads working for the mine owners in late
February 2006 and is presumed dead.
State sponsored terror today is reminiscent of the worst days of
martial law, under the Dictator Ferdinand Marcos (1972-1986). As
under Marcos the entire countryside is virtually under military
control sharply limiting the role of civilian administrators. A
manual published by the Macapagal regime, entitled “Knowing the
Enemy” is used by the Armed Forces throughout the country to label
legal mass organizations and civil rights groups, like the
Philippine Association of Protestant Lawyers, as supporters of
‘terrorism’.
The combined military-death squad campaign has all the earmarks of
US-sponsored ‘low intensity’ warfare against the civilian
population. The military “proscribes” or labels individuals and
groups as terrorists on the basis of what it claims to be ‘secret
intelligence’ in order to criminalize their right to resist
oppression and fight for self-determination and justify their
elimination. The creation of these ‘lists’ is outside of the process
of judicial scrutiny and limits any legal protection for the victims
or their survivors. Using the black propaganda of a psychological
warfare operation, the victims and their associations are invariably
described as ‘terrorists’.
Background
A de-facto civilian-military alliance has been ruling the
Philippines, since with the declaration of Martial Law by Marcos in
1972. In the 1960’s most economists considered the Philippines to be
the most economically progressive nation in South East Asia. With
the advent of the liberalization of the economy, it has become and
remains the one of the poorest and most socially polarized country
in Asia, with a per capita GDP of $950/year, about half of
Thailand’s. With over 50% of total private assets controlled by 15
extended super-rich families it is one of most unequal societies in
the world. In stark contrast to the rest of Asia, there has been no
economic progress in the past two decades. The Philippines with a
population of over 85 million has one of the highest unemployment
rates (20%) and an additional 30% underemployed in the informal
sector. Over 40% of the households are unable secure adequate
shelter and food; they are the indigent poor. The once highly
regarded public educational and health systems have sharply
deteriorated due to massive government cuts in social spending and
privatization. The nation, whose research institutions produced the
high yield ‘miracle rice’, is now a net importer of rice and other
food staples. Malnutrition is widespread, according to the World
Health Organization. Upwards of eight million Filipinos, unable to
find decent work at home, are working abroad to support their
families ‘Better to die working in Iraq, than to stay home and watch
your family starve’ was the pitiful, but common slogan of Filipino
workers clamoring for exit visas to perform menial work for the US
occupation army in Iraq. As many as 4,000 Filipino workers are
believed to be in Iraq.
In the years following the overthrow of the Marcos dictatorship
(Feb. 26, 1986) by a military and Church-backed revolt, the
subsequent elected presidents have failed to stem the ongoing
deterioration of the country. The new rulers like Corazon Aquino
(1986-1992), and former General Fidel Ramos (1992-1998), simply
favored a new set of oligarchs and set the stage for the rise to
power of a corrupt populist, Joseph Estrada. His “anti-oligarch”
rhetoric brought him to the presidential palace in 1998 with
widespread support among the poor. Estrada became an irritant to
Washington and the traditional oligarchy by welcoming Venezuelan
President Hugo Chavez in 1999 and for his populist social policies,
such as handing out thousands of land titles to urban squatters.
US-designed, upper class-backed, street demonstrations supported by
sectors of the military elite culminated in the ouster of Estrada in
January 2001. The same forces hoisted his Vice President, Gloria
Macapagal Arroyo to the Presidency. Macapagal is a US educated,
neo-liberal economist and favorite of the US Embassy.
This political putsch led to the expansion of US military basing
rights and a new military agreement, quickly signed by Macapagal
after a two year delay during Estrada’s presidency. With the rise of
Macapagal-Arroyo, Washington has a reliable client.
From Populism to Neo-Liberal Terror
The newly ‘installed’ Macapagal Arroyo quickly instituted a
neo-liberal program of privatizations, drastic cuts for public
education and public hospitals and onerous value-added taxes which
impacted the poor and lower middle-class. By 2005, the Philippine
total external and internal debt ballooned to over $100 billion
dollars and yearly debt servicing exceed 30% of the budget. Even 8
million overseas Filipino workers (including a significant section
of the educated professionals) sending home $12.5 billion dollars of
remittances in 2005 could not begin to cover debt servicing. The
Philippines bears the dubious distinction of being the only country
in Asia to have seen a drop in per capita GDP during and since the
heady years of the ‘Asian Tiger’ boom.
Macapagal Arroyo’s family and cronies have been implicated in the
same levels of corruption as that attributed to the deposed
President Estrada. Mike Arroyo, the President’s husband, remains in
self-imposed exile in the US to avoid facing charges of graft and
fraud. Macapagal Arroyo maintains her support among the military by
offering lucrative concessions to favorite generals and key
officials in the military leading to deep discontent among the
junior ranks of the armed forces forced to survive on low wages. As
a result, several mutinies of junior officers and soldiers occurred,
the largest of which was the takeover of an upscale Manila shopping
and apartment complex in July 2003 by 300 soldiers from the special
forces and the more recent uprising of Marines in January of this
year.
Military intelligence has been implicated in a campaign of bombings
both in Manila and on the southern island of Mindanao, targeting
markets, buses, commuter trains, airports and mosques. The Macapagal
regime blamed a Moslem kidnapping gang, Abu Sayaf, and used the
bombings as a justification for greater militarization of the
country. The curious timing of the bombings, for example the
December 2004 bombing of a Manila shopping center, which killed 15,
happened very soon after a devastating landslide burying almost
1,000 townspeople in a province near Manila, exposed the regimes
incompetence in civil assistance.
Local journalist with sources in the military believe the campaign
of bombings have been carried out by the regime itself to justify
requests for more military ‘aid’ from the US.
The US Connection
In December 2002 the US announced a significant expansion of its
joint US-Philippine military training exercises. The first
contingent of US troops landing on the southern island of Mindanao
engaged in field operations against the Muslim separatists. In early
2003 then-Assistant US Secretary of Defense, Paul Wolfowitz called
the Philippines the ‘Second Front in the War on Terror’. Since then
tens of thousands of Muslem villagers have been forcibly displaced
and hundreds have been tortured, killed or disappeared. As a result
Muslim guerrilla activity has increased.
In October 2003, during a visit to the Philippines, Bush cited the
Philippines as a model for the re-building of Iraq. Forgetting to
mention the US invasion of the Philippines in 1898 and 13-year
pacification campaign when upwards of 1 million Filipinos died, Bush
described the Philippines as a “model of democracy” – a bonafide
death squad democracy.
The Bush Administration’s support for the Macapagal Arroyo regime
has been reciprocated: A contingent of Philippine troops was sent to
Iraq over the protests of hundreds of thousands of Filipinos. These
troops were only withdrawn when Iraqi resistance fighters threatened
to execute captured Filipino laborers in Iraq: the Philippine
economy is more dependent on remittances from its workers in the
Middle East than on US aid. The lucrative reconstruction contracts,
which the Philippine elite had expected to be awarded for its
services to the Bush Administration in Iraq, never materialized.
During 2006, another contingent 5,500 US soldiers are scheduled to
arrive in Mindanao and the number of joint exercises has doubled.
US troops are not confined to the separatist stronghold in the far
south of the country. More and more “joint operations” occur in the
central islands and Luzon where the communist New Peoples Army has
been conducting a campaign against the government for 40 years over
issues of land reform and oligarchic-imperialist control of the
economy. With an estimated 10,000 fighters, the NPA is clearly
viewed as a threat to US and local ruling class interests.
Urban Popular Protest and Emergency Decrees
In 2004, Macapagal Arroyo narrowly defeated her rival in the
Presidential elections in a campaign marred by violence and fraud.
An audiotape released in the spring of 2005 recorded the President
discussing with a top election official the rigging of the election.
Amid resignations of members of her cabinet and calls for her
resignation from the general public, she narrowly escaped a vote of
impeachment in November 2005.
Macapagal Arroyo’s disastrous neo-liberal economic policies, the
growing social and economic deterioration of the country, frantic
attempts by the professionals to escape through immigration, moves
by restive middle level officers and demonstrations by popular mass
social movements put the Philippines back in the international news.
In early February 2006, an even more devastating landslide brought
on by rains and de-forestation, buried almost 2,000 townspeople on
the island of Leyte. The inability of the regime to provide even the
most basic aid to the victims angered the entire nation.
On February 23, 2006, the eve of the 20th anniversary of the
overthrow of the
Marcos dictatorship, Macapagal Arroyo declared a state of emergency
banning all rallies, demonstrations and closing opposition media.
She issued orders for the arrest of 59 individuals including members
of the Congress, military officers and social critics, on charges of
rebellion against her regime. Rallies were planned to commemorate
the end of the Marcos dictatorship and to protest the electoral
fraud, corruption, economic mismanagement and human rights
violations of the Macapagal Arroyo regime. Some rallies defied the
President’s decree, went ahead and were violently repressed.
Those charged with rebellion included 6 Congress people from
leftwing political parties, a human rights attorney, retired and
active military officers and social activists. Most of the charges
have no substance and are totally arbitrary. For example, Anakpawis
(Toiling Masses) Congressman Crispin Beltran, age 73, veteran labor
leader and anti-Marcos activist, was arrested shortly after the
Emergency Rule declaration, at first on the basis of a 25-year-old
charge made during the Marcos dictatorship. When these charges were
shown to have been dropped decades earlier, he was charged with
rebellion.
This is the latest of a series of attacks on the part of the
Macapagal Arroyo regime aimed specifically at destroying class-based
political parties and trade union activity, including Bayan Muna and
its coalition partners. The campaign of assassination and
disappearances of 80 members of this party alliance between
2001-2005, including mayors and provincial elected representatives
has finally reached the top elected representatives in the
Philippine Congress. In 2006, repression turned from the countryside
to the capital, from peasant leaders to Manila-based Congress
people, media, working class and left party leaders. Of the 26
political assassinations in the first 10 weeks of 2006, 3 have been
Bayan Muna officials.
The arbitrary arrest of Congressional representatives sends a signal
to the legal left that the regime will not tolerate dissent or
challenges to its policies even from within Congress.
Who are the Perpetrators?
According to the KARAPATAN, the independent human rights
organization involved in documenting and providing legal support to
victims of human rights abuses, the disappearances and
assassinations are committed by death squads in some of the most
heavily militarized areas in the Philippines. The death squads would
not be able to act with impunity without the complicity of the
military. Witnesses to the killings have themselves disappeared and
the Philippine judicial system has failed to prosecute the
intellectual authors or perpetrators. Nor has the military made any
effort to investigate and arrest identified death squad leaders.
Human rights groups provide evidence that death squads operate under
the protective umbrella of regional military commands, especially
the US-trained Special Forces. Macapagal’s promotion of the
notorious Colonel Jovito Palparan, (‘Butcher of Mindoro’) to
General, despite extensive documentation and testimony of gross
human rights abuses points to the President’s support for
military-backed state terrorism. When Palparan was assigned to
Central Luzon in September 2005, the number of political
assassinations in that region alone jumped to 52 in four months.
Prior to his promotion, the regions with the largest number of
summary executions like Eastern Visayas and Central Luzon were under
then-Colonel Palparan.
State of the Resistance
In the face the disintegration of the economy and society, and the
regime’s use of force to sustain its hold on power, faced with its
gross incompetence in the face of several natural/ecological
disasters, popular resistance has spread from the countryside to the
cities. The popular mass organizations, involving peasant and
indigenous minority farmers, industrial workers, teachers,
journalists, civil servants, students, women, artists, human rights
workers, lawyers and clergy have grown despite the campaign of state
terror. On the 20th Anniversary of the 1986 overthrow of Marcos,
tens of thousands defied the State of Emergency and marched in
Manila and in cities throughout the country. Over 10,000 women
defied police bans to march on International Women’s Day. Students
and teachers are mounting campaigns on the campuses around the
country. Former Presidents, business executives and clergy are
calling for Macapagal Arroyo’s resignation and a ‘smooth transition’
within the elite, while the popular mass movements and their
besieged political representatives are demanding justice for the
victims of state terror, an end to US military presence, a repeal of
the value added taxes, an increase in the minimum wage, land reform,
a moratorium of debt payments, re-nationalization of key economic
sectors and consequential peace negotiations between the state and
the NPA and Muslim separatists. That Macapagal Arroyo will
eventually be forced to resign is, according to officials, a likely
outcome. The question is when and by whom?
Click below to read or post comment's on this article
(In accordance with Title 17
U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to
those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational purposes.
Information Clearing House has no affiliation whatsoever with the
originator of this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.) |