|
Canada, Get Out of Afghanistan
By Eric Margolis
03/14/06 "ICH" -- -- PARIS – Scattered across South Africa's
windswept veldt are the forgotten graves of 266 Canadian soldiers
killed from 1899–1902 fighting to impose British Imperial rule on
fiercely resisting Boer farmers.
A century later, Canadian troops have again been sent to fight as
auxiliaries in another remote war – this time Afghanistan.
Since time immemorial, when great emperors went to war, they
summoned contingents of their vassals and tributaries to their
standards. So it was in Afghanistan, and then Iraq, when the U.S.
decided to invade those nations and demand its allies join the
so-called "war on terrorism."
Under irresistible pressure from Washington to aid its highly
unpopular military expeditions in either Iraq or Afghanistan,
America's allies and NATO partners opted for the lesser evil,
Afghanistan.
That is why 2,100 Canadian troops have ended up in a nation in which
Canada has absolutely no strategic, commercial, cultural or
emotional interests.
Now, as the number of Canadian military casualties rises, the
dismayed public rightly asks, "What are we doing there? We thought
it was another peacekeeping mission."
Thank Ottawa and Canada's media for misinforming the public. There
was no significant debate in Parliament. The media indulged in
flag-waving instead of warning Canadians they were walking into a
small, but real, war.
Canadians are not peacekeeping in Kandahar: There is no peace to
keep. They are there to help impose U.S. rule over Afghanistan, and
safeguard routes for planned oil pipelines.
Canadian soldiers are on a war-fighting mission, auxiliaries in the
U.S.-led military occupation of Afghanistan. In the southern
heartland of the nation's largest tribe, the famously warlike and
xenophobic Pashtun, U.S. forces and their allies are seen as foreign
occupiers and enemies of Islam. Pashtun are slow to act but
ferocious, and they never forget a wrong.
For some reason, Ottawa agreed to put its little garrison into
Afghanistan's most dangerous area, Kandahar, in the centre of
Pashtun territory and the heartland of the Taliban. Afghans do not
differentiate between Americans and Canadians.
Fierce tribes
Afghan tribes are taking up arms against their foreign occupiers. I
saw this happen during the 1980s, when growing hatred of Soviet
occupation forces ignited a national uprising.
Today, in the eyes of many Afghans, the U.S. has merely replaced the
Soviets. All past occupiers, starting with Alexander the Great, were
driven out by the fierce Afghan tribes.
Canucks are prime targets. They lack effective liaison with circling
U.S. warplanes that normally bomb and rocket any attackers within
2–3 minutes of an assault. Such deadly instant response by U.S. air
power forced the resistance to resort to roadside explosives and car
bombs, as in Iraq.
National resistance is growing. The U.S.-installed Karzai regime in
Kabul would not last a day without foreign bayonets.
The former Taliban regime almost totally suppressed the heroin
trade. Today, Afghanistan is a narcostate. It supplies 90% of the
world's heroin – the economy runs on drug money. This is the
"democratic" régime Canadian troops are defending with their lives.
Parliament, media, and all Canadians have got to begin debating what
their soldiers are doing in this war that lacks any foreseeable
political resolution. Forget all the cheery propaganda fed to the
gullible press: Afghanistan is a dangerous mess and Canadians are
right in the middle of it.
When more body bags come home from Kandahar, as they likely will,
Canada's politicians are going to have to start explaining to the
public what, exactly, its soldiers are dying for in Afghanistan.
Eric Margolis,
<
margolis@foreigncorrespondent.com > contributing foreign editor for Sun National Media
Canada, is the author of War at the Top of the World.
http://www.ericmargolis.com/
Copyright © 2006 Eric Margolis
Click below to read or post comment's on this article
(In accordance with Title 17
U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to
those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational purposes.
Information Clearing House has no affiliation whatsoever with the
originator of this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.) |
