How to Break the American Trance
If we Americans are split into two meaningful camps, it is not
conservative versus liberal. The two camps are the politically
awake and the hypnotized.
By Doris "Granny D" Haddock
04/11/06 "AlterNet"
-- - The following is a speech given by
92-year-old Doris "Granny D" Haddock, who walked across the U.S.
in 1999-2000 for campaign finance reform. She made this speech
to Citizens for Participation in Political Action in Boston, on
Sept. 27, 2002.
I want to begin by congratulating you for all the work you do. I
know it is often frustrating work. You are blessed to be able to
see ahead to a world of cooperation and peace -- a world of
justice and sustainable economies and meaningful democracies.
You wonder why others cannot or will not see these things or
reach out for them, and why they in fact oppose the obvious good
-- why they take the part of the oppressor, the blindered war
horse.
I would like us to take a few moments to consider why this work
is so hard, and what we might do to move toward our common
dreams more rapidly and with greater joy.
Some of you may be old enough to remember the Reagan
Administration. Mr. Reagan and those around him believed in a
very new kind of American hero. This new hero was a business
hero -- not the fellow who built up a family furniture store on
Main Street and supported the Little League and the Scouts; this
new hero was not the woman who worked late hours to create a
successful travel agency, nor was this new business hero
anything like any of the hard-working Americans who built-up our
middle class, advanced our standard of living and gave us the
resources and leisure for the proper civic life of a democracy,
with its leagues and Rotaries and Lions and Elks and VFWs and
party conventions and all that glory.
No, the Reagan business hero was the corporate takeover artist.
Any regulations that might get in the way of these ruthless new
capitalists were removed -- removed so that reptiles of uncommon
greed and brutality might rule the earth, which they now nearly
do.
What soon happened was that ALL corporations of medium size or
larger had to look over their shoulders. How did a corporation
protect itself in this environment from a hostile takeover? It
had to close down any factories that were not earning obscene
profits. Never mind that a factory had served a town well for a
century, or that it provided a healthy and regular profit for
its stockholders. If it seemed to be underperfoming by the new
hypergreed standards, or if it could be closed in favor of
opening a foreign plant that provided a slightly higher rate of
return, then, in this new atmosphere, the company was derelict
in its duty to its stockholders if it did not ruthlessly act.
Perfectly good and profitable factories were closed. Benefits to
employees everywhere were attacked, and staffs were downsized,
outsourced, computerized, downsized again, outsourced again to
temp agencies that paid no health care or retirement, and on and
on until America became a very different place. The gap between
rich and poor is now wider than at any time in our history.
It is still a wealthy nation for many people, but poverty is on
the rise, and those with jobs find themselves so overworked
trying to make ends meet that there is little time for family or
for the joy of living. Indeed, there is very little joy left in
American life. Workers are not loyal to their companies, because
companies treat them like expendable slaves, with no dignity or
assurance that hard work will result in advancement or security.
We are living in the harsh world invented by a handful of
corporate raiders whose values were completely foreign to the
fairness and moderation that had so long served as the proper
foundation of American success and the American dream of plenty
for all. They were not a new kind of person, for there have
always been among us a few reptilian hearts of uncommon greed.
What was new was the political permission they received for
their rape and rampage, which continues.
And so a new world devolved as if from a virus. The new business
hero, a Horatio Alger on crack, did very well. The new model CEO
derived from that moment -- the ruthless mercenary who would
come in to reorganize a company and render it takeover-proof by
rendering it inhumane. This executive was worth millions per
year, we were told. In this way, a Darwinian system of corporate
survival assured that the most carnivorous, rather than the most
responsible, would rise to lead our most powerful commercial
organizations. And if you need an explanation for Fox News or
Enron, this is the history you need to remember.
These superwealthy predators now, through their political
patronage, control both political parties. They control Congress
and the White House. They control elements within your state
house. They are not particularly smart people, as their current
agent in the White House clearly demonstrates.
Here is how the takeover of corporations became the corporate
takeover of American democracy: To get along and move up in one
of these right wing business organizations, you have to be like
the boss. The people working under you will then want to be like
you to get along themselves. In Fox News, even reporters in
local regions are told how to slant each story hard to the
right. There is no pretense of journalism within the
organization. And many people stuck in those jobs, who got into
journalism with the idea of doing legitimate journalism, are
sick to their stomachs every working day.
In this way, the right-wing leanings of a few people have
distorted entire industries, including television news.
Political leaders are quickly infected in this trickle down
reptilism -- trickling down from the people who write the checks
for political campaigns and who control political news.
And the reptilism trickles down further, to the weaker minds
listening to talk radio or silly enough to spend too much time
watching cable television news -- people who buy the lies, who
are simply suckered into forking over their own political best
interests to the con artists who attempt to pick their pockets
at the same moment they are pointing out others who, they say,
are the real trouble makers. About 25 percent of our people are
susceptible to this kind of con, and they then give us problems
by standing against any reasonable reforms. They have been
spiritually twisted by the cheap poison of a hundred Rush
Limbaughs into the angry, unthinking agents of the superrich.
On my long walk across America, a man driving a garbage truck
told me that the biggest problem facing America today was the
inheritance tax. I didn't have to ask him if he had a radio in
his truck.
I remind you of all this because it is important to know that
the reason our reforms are difficult is not because Americans
are split into two camps, conservative and liberal. It is not
like that at all. There are lots of conservatives and liberals
in America, but we are not the two sides of the divide. True
conservatives in our country don't have many political leaders
to look to with respect. Among the last was Barry Goldwater. He
believed that the government had no business in our bedrooms. He
believed that a woman and her doctor didn't need the
government's help in deciding her important issues. He would
have laughed and then, I think, become very, very angry at
Ashcroft's attacks on the Bill of Rights and his
citizen-against-citizen snitching system. Goldwater believed
that the only issue of importance regarding gays in the military
was whether or not they could shoot straight.
What we are seeing now from the far right is not conservatism at
all. It is fascism: the imposition of a national and worldwide
police state to enforce a narrow world view that enriches and
empowers the few at the expense of the many, and that gives no
respect or honor to other cultures, ways of living, or opinions.
To call that conservatism is a crime against the memory of
America's great and true conservatives, who might think that
government ought to be less involved in life than we old
liberals would concur with, but who nevertheless stood for the
core American values that today's right-wing leaders undermine
at every opportunity.
We Americans are not split into liberals and conservatives. In
fact, if you are running for office from the center, or from
left of center, just do a better job of demonstrating how far
right-wing your opponent is, and you will win more and more
votes. You will win them from the vast number of people, most
especially urban women and professional men, who identify
themselves as Republicans for old time's sake, but who are very
uncomfortable when forced to look squarely at the far right
positions of many candidates running under the flag of the Grand
Old Party. Given moderate alternatives, they will vote for them.
That was exactly the truth that Clinton understood and exploited
so brilliantly. He understood that Republicans are conservatives
but the Republican Party is not. If you want to reflect upon how
well he exploited this insight, remember that Hillary was a
Republican when he met her.
If we Americans are split into two meaningful camps, it is not
conservative versus liberal. The two camps are these: the
politically awake and the hypnotized -- hypnotized by television
and other mass media, whose overpaid Svengalis dangle the
swinging medallions of packaged candidates and oft-told lies. It
is all done to politically prolong the open season on us -- open
season indeed, as the billionaire takeover artists bag their
catch for the day. And in their bags are our freedoms, our
leisure, our health care futures, our old age security, our
family time, our village life, our family-owned businesses on
Main Street, the middle class itself, and our position of honor
and peaceful leadership in the world.
Once we understand what we are up against, and where the
meaningful dividing lines truly run, our lives as reformers can
be easier because we shall know how to proceed.
How to break the hypnosis is then the question. It is easy.
Pull any contractor out of his white pickup truck, turn down the
talk radio blaring from it, and ask him, "Government good, or
government bad?"
His glazed eyes will widen. "Government bad!" he will say.
Ok, good. You found one to play with.
Now, ask him what the town might do to make it safer for kids to
get to and from school, and around town when they're not in
school, without getting killed by traffic or getting in trouble.
He will have a million ideas. Good ideas. He has no clue that he
is being government -- if government is what happens when we get
together to solve our common problems and to make life better
for our communities.
You have broken his trance.
When a proposition is on the ballot, people talk about the
mechanics of the idea, and the hypnosis is largely circumvented.
You see quite progressive ballot propositions passing in
otherwise quite unprogressive states. Why? Because people are
problem-solvers at heart, and they enjoy it. They want to
participate and be helpful and accepted as valuable players. It
takes a lot of hypnosis to overcome that instinct, and a lot of
hypnosis is what we have had. But we can get around it.
Government agencies, of course, have been the communitarian's
worst enemies. Anything that smacks of bureaucratic rudeness or
pushiness or counterproductive stubbornness does nothing but
damage the idea that government is us -- we the people acting
together to solve our problems as fellow citizens. That brand of
government really needs to be stamped out whenever it shows its
pinched, gray face. That is what can be done and must be done to
prepare the ground for what must come next, which is a new
engagement of citizens with the issues of interest to them in
their communities. We should begin in our high schools. During
the years from 13 to 19, lifelong civic values are formed.
We should start with our younger people. As community leaders,
we should work with the popular history and civics teachers in
our high schools to bring the issues of the day and the issues
of the town into the classroom -- not to propagandize but to
openly invite students to learn, research, and offer advice to
the community on a wide range of issues. This is where the
hypnosis falls apart. This is where democracy finds its feet
again.
This summer I asked America's independent community radio
stations to get involved with those same teachers in our high
schools, to make students into community reporters and
commentators. I reminded these indy news stations that they have
the technology and the dramatic missions young people crave. I
said young people will never become robots if they are enlisted
in the cause of truth at an early age.
What we do in schools, we must also do in colleges and then in
the general community. But if we only have the means to focus on
the high schools, that is enough. These young people will be
voting in only a few years. If we support their increased civic
engagement as they move through college and into the community,
we will have raised an army of citizens immunized against
corporate hypnosis. Our victories for needed reforms will come
naturally. With an engaged and informed citizenry, who knows
what good we might do, and what great civilization we might yet
again move toward?
True conservatives and liberals unite! Bring your issues and
your opinions to our young people, and create a new expectation
that they will get involved, get informed, and form a view of
themselves as problem-solving citizens of a democracy. Our
differences from the left or right are nothing compared to the
differences between the politically awake and the hypnotized
drones of the new colonialism that now stalks and shreds our
civilization.
I urge you to think young, to link with moderates on the other
side of the fence, and to approach the schools and teachers who
can help you connect your young, rising citizens to the issues
that will shape their lives.
If you believe that human beings, in addition to all their other
instincts, want to help create and live in a happy, creative and
cooperative world, then you must believe that people are to be
trusted in their politics so long as they are encouraged to
study everyone's experience and study the competing points of
view -- and so long as they are raised with enough love and
security to be capable of empathy. We need not force a liberal
agenda on our society, any more than we need force our political
opinions on our children. We can enjoy life instead of banging
our heads against the old walls. If we encourage an awake
thoughtfulness, democracy and justice will have all the
victories our hearts can handle.
To read more of Doris Haddock's writings, visit GrannyD.com
Click below to read or post comments on this article