Robbery, not reconstruction, in Iraq
By Derrick Z. Jackson
Globe Columnist
0
4/18/06 "Boston
Globe" -- - The great liberator of Iraq was
actually the hyena that cleaned out the nation.
Piece by piece, Halliburton over here, a corrupt company over
there, we have heard various individual cases of overcharging
and fraud by American firms in the reconstruction of Iraq. Last
weekend, a Globe story connected some of the dots of corruption.
Of $20.7 billion in Iraqi bank accounts and oil revenues seized
by the Coalition Provisional Authority in the US-led invasion of
Iraq, $14 billion was given out for reconstruction but tens of
millions of dollars were unaccounted for. A year ago, an audit
by the inspector general found no evidence of work done or goods
delivered on 154 of 198 contracts. Sixty cases of potential
swindles are under investigation.
Halliburton and its hundreds of millions of dollars of
overcharges or baseless costs are well known. But millions more
were taken by companies that promised to build or restore
libraries or police facilities, or deliver trucks and
construction equipment. Money was given to the puppet government
with no follow-up. US government investigators can account for
only a third of the $1.5 billion given by the CPA to the interim
government and it appears that a substantial portion of the $8
billion given to Iraqi ministries went to ''ghost employees.''
Because of the way the United States set things up after the
invasion, contractors are immune from prosecution by Iraqis. And
even when firms are prosecuted, the millions of dollars in fines
go to the US Treasury, not the Iraqi people. It amounts to two
invasions. First the bombs. Then the banks.
This is robbery, not reconstruction.
It also amounts to yet another slow-motion lie by the Bush
administration. The magnitude of the corruption brings into
sharper relief the claims made by then-Deputy Defense Secretary
Paul Wolfowitz a month before the war.
The claims came from the same infamous testimony before the
House Budget Committee where Wolfowitz said Army chief of staff
Eric Shinseki was ''wildly off the mark'' for saying several
hundred thousand troops would be needed to stabilize Iraq.
Wolfowitz told the committee that the administration was ''doing
everything possible in our planning now to make post-war
recovery smoother and less expensive.''
Besides pooh-poohing Shinseki's estimates, Wolfowitz said a
Washington Post story that quoted administration officials as
saying the initial invasion would cost $60 billion to $95
billion was also way off the mark. Speaking about such
administration officials, Wolfowitz said, ''I don't think he
knows what he's talking - he or she knows what they're talking
about. I mean, I think the idea that it's going to be eclipsed
by these monstrous future costs ignores the nature of the
country we're dealing with.''
''It's got already, I believe, on the order of $15 billion to
$20 billion a year in oil exports, which can finally - might
finally be turned to a good use instead of building Saddam's
palaces. It has one of the most valuable undeveloped sources of
natural resources in the world. And let me emphasize, if we
liberate Iraq, those resources will belong to the Iraqi people,
that they will be able to develop them and borrow against
them.''
''It is a country that has somewhere between, I believe, over
$10 billion -- let me not put a number on it - in an escrow
account run by the United Nations. It's a country that has $10
billion to $20 billion in frozen assets from the Gulf War, and I
don't know how many billions that are closeted away by Saddam
and his henchmen. But there's a lot of money there and to assume
that we're going to pay for it is just wrong.''
Wolfowitz was wrong on nearly every point, except for the idea
that there was about $20 billion floating around Iraq to seize.
It has been three years and all Iraq has become is a
''free-fraud zone,'' according to one of the attorneys for
whistleblowers in Iraqi swindles. Recently, the Army found that
Halliburton had $263 million of exaggerated or unexplainable
costs on a $2.4 billion no-bid contract, yet still paid
Halliburton $253 million of the $263 million.
Halliburton is in 103rd place in the Fortune 500 with $21
billion in revenues and just under $2.4 billion in profits.
Halliburton gets its $2.4 billion no-bid contract nearly paid in
full while the Iraqi people are out of much of their $21
billion. We liberated Iraq. The resources belong to American
contractors.
Derrick Z. Jackson's e-mail address is jackson@globe.com.
© Copyright 2005 The New York Times Company
Click below to read or post comments on this article