Words of Mass Deception
By Sydney Morning Herald
05/13/06 "SMH"-- -- Rod Barton blew the whistle on Australian,
US and British lies about Iraq's hidden weapons cache. And the
Australian Government has made sure he pays a high price for his
stand. Hamish McDonald reports
FOR a decade Rod Barton knew the special loneliness of a United
Nations weapons inspector in Iraq, teasing out clues from one of
the world's nastiest regimes about biological weapons of
unspeakable effect.
He worried about assassination by Saddam Hussein's secret
services, not an unrealistic fear. He felt the derision of the
ascendant hawks in Washington, confident they knew better than
the UN inspectors about Saddam's secret weapons.
Now Barton is suffering a new kind of isolation after turning
whistleblower on how the American, British and Australian
leaders distorted intelligence to justify their invasion of Iraq
and how they condone the torture of Iraqi prisoners.
Back home in Canberra, Barton is ostracised and unemployed in
his old intelligence profession, to which at 58 and still
formidably incisive, he could still contribute a lot. He looks
at the view of the Brindabellas. He roams the world's trouble
spots on Google Earth, the satellite imagery website. The house
could not be any tidier, nor the garden crammed with any more
shrubs.
Barton made waves and is being punished. In March 2004, he and
another Australian, the Foreign Affairs disarmament specialist
John Gee, resigned in protest from the Iraq Survey Group, set up
by the US Central Intelligence Agency to find the Iraqi nuclear,
chemical and biological weapons that had been the excuse for
invasion. The CIA was refusing to face the truth that Saddam's
weapons had been destroyed in 1991.
In February last year, Barton went public on ABC television. Now
he has written a devastating book about it, The Weapons
Detective (Black Inc. Agenda, $29.95). His security clearances
withdrawn, Barton knows he will not be getting any more
contracts from his old employer, the Defence Intelligence
Organisation, which he had joined as a young microbiologist in
1972.
Old colleagues at the intelligence organisation have been warned
not to have contact with him, not even social meetings. In one
act of spectacular pettiness, at the insistence of the Prime
Minister's staff, Barton and Gee were dropped from the guest
list for last year's 20th anniversary meeting in Sydney of the
Australia Group, a forum of intelligence specialists from 38
countries on chemical and biological weapons, which the two had
helped set up in 1985.
"I knew that blowing the whistle would bring some penalties, but
not to this extent," Barton says. "Was I that much a threat to
the security of Australia when - what was it I spoke out about:
prisoner abuse?"
In his new book, Barton lays out in shocking clarity that the
reason for the Iraq invasion cited by America's George Bush,
Britain's Tony Blair and Australia's John Howard was false.
Blair and Howard knew it was false, Barton says. Bush may not
have known, because his intelligence agencies were reporting
what he wanted to hear.
When shown the Australian intelligence assessment, Howard even
asked: "Is that all there is?"
Barton saw both the British and Australian intelligence
assessments about Saddam's weapons of mass destruction before
the March 2003 invasion. Saddam had at most a few chemical and
biological weapons left over from the 1980s, and no means of
delivering them. There was no evidence he had resumed WMD
programs after UN weapons inspectors were kicked out in 1998.
It was no grounds for war, so the intelligence was doctored -
notably in the British "dossier" published on the orders of the
British Joint Intelligence Committee chairman, John Scarlett,
which claimed Saddam had chemical and biological weapons
deployable "within 45 minutes of an order to use them".
Howard cited the British dossier in assuring the Australian
public and Parliament his Government had "compelling evidence"
that Saddam possessed these weapons. "Is it a lie or is it a
spin or what?" Barton said. "But it's certainly misleading the
people."
The liars and spin doctors have prospered, the whistleblowers
have been shafted. Barton's former UN colleague and friend, the
British defence scientist David Kelly, killed himself in July
2003 after being outed for telling a BBC journalist how Scarlett
had "sexed up" the Iraq intelligence. Scarlett was still "sexing
up" the post-invasion intelligence, Barton shows, but has been
made chief of Britain's famous spy service, MI6. Barton shakes
his head: "John Scarlett should not head any intelligence
organisation." In the CIA, the medals, cash bonuses and
promotions go to agents who tell their chiefs about new weapons
threats, not the ones who caution the evidence is weak.
In Australia, Barton sees a general culture of compliance in the
public service spreading to the intelligence agencies. "You know
you're not going to get promoted if you tell the Government
something that's unpopular," he says.
One bit of unwelcome reporting by Barton, to Australia's Defence
Department, was the first indication of the special "purgatory"
centre being run by US Special Forces at Camp Nama, next to
Baghdad Airport.
"High value" prisoners selected for disorientation before
interrogation have a hessian bag put over their heads for up to
72 hours, and are deprived of food, water and sleep, made to
stand up for long periods, exposed to intense heat or cold, and
bashed at random intervals. Unlike the improvised brutality by
US soldiers exposed at the Abu Ghraib prison, all this is
sanctioned by the US Administration, which claims it does not
amount to torture. "That's what makes it so much worse," Barton
says.
"We went to war on WMD, which is withdrawn now. And now the
casus belli is to bring democracy and human rights - yet we, the
coalition, are detaining people without trial, and we the
coalition are using torture techniques," Barton says. "As a
member of the coalition we have a responsibility. We, the
Australians, should be telling our American colleagues: This is
just not acceptable; if you want us as a member of the
coalition, to continue our presence there, then we ask you to
stop this practice.
"But of course this Government doesn't want to upset the
Americans, so we won't do that."
Copyright © 2006. The Sydney Morning Herald.
Click below to read or post comments on this article