U.S. Says Troops Fired at Crowd In Afghan Capital
Shooting Was in Self-Defense, Spokesman for Military Says
By Pamela Constable
Washington Post Foreign Service
06/01/06 "Washington
Post" -- -- KABUL, Afghanistan, May 31 --
U.S. military officials acknowledged Wednesday that American
troops had fired at an angry mob that surrounded the scene of a
traffic accident in the Afghan capital Monday morning. Officials
previously had said the troops fired only into the air.
In the fatal accident, the driver of a U.S. military cargo truck
lost control and struck 12 vehicles in rush-hour traffic,
killing one person and injuring six, the military said. The
incident sparked violent, day-long riots that ended with 20
dead, 160 injured and dozens of buildings badly damaged.
President Bush spoke with Afghan President Hamid Karzai on
Wednesday and pledged a full investigation, White House press
secretary Tony Snow said in Washington, according to the
Associated Press.
The incident has exposed deep public resentment against the
presence of foreign troops here and shaken investor confidence
in the fledgling postwar economy at a time when Afghanistan
faces a mounting threat from armed Taliban fighters and other
insurgents in the countryside.
"Initial indications from our investigation are that coalition
soldiers did in fact use their weapons in self-defense," Col.
Thomas Collins, a U.S. military spokesman, said at a news
conference here. He said it appeared that gunfire had come from
the crowd and that the troops had "used their weapons to defend
themselves."
Collins said that he had no further details but that an
investigation was underway.
Several people taken to hospitals in Kabul on Monday were
suffering from gunshot wounds, but it was not clear who had shot
them. During the day, rioters clashed repeatedly with Afghan
police and burned their checkpoints. Some rioters were armed
with AK-47 assault rifles, witnesses said.
Collins repeatedly expressed regret for the accident and the
deaths. But he also said the truck driver had done everything
possible to avoid hitting pedestrians and occupied vehicles
after his brakes failed on a steep hill leading down to a busy
intersection.
After the accident, he said, U.S. troops in the convoy began to
aid injured civilians but were quickly surrounded by an angry
crowd of 300 to 500 men who started to throw stones at them. He
said that city police soon arrived and formed a barricade around
the halted convoy, but that the crowd became increasingly
hostile. The U.S. troops decided to leave, firing some shots in
the process, he said.
Collins said no U.S. soldier had been injured, but he added,
"That doesn't mean they were not in serious, immediate danger of
injury or death." He said victims of the accident and their
families would be compensated.
News videos of the scene showed a large group of men shouting
and throwing stones, then ducking and running as Humvees and
other military vehicles sped past, amid sounds of gunfire.
As word of the accident and possible civilian shootings spread
through the city, enraged mobs swarmed into downtown Kabul,
attacking banks, hotels and foreign aid offices and burning
dozens of cars. Many shouted anti-American slogans. It was the
worst violence in the Afghan capital since the overthrow of the
Taliban in 2001.
A curfew was announced Monday night and calm had returned to the
city Tuesday, but Afghan army troops have been heavily
patrolling the area since. Many Afghans have condemned the
street violence, but they have also blamed U.S. troops for
causing the accident and expressed broader anger at their
aggressive driving and treatment of civilians.
Collins said that he was aware of such criticisms and that
coalition officials "take that feedback very, very seriously."
He said the U.S.-led forces were here "at the request of the
Afghan people and we must always act responsibly." Afghans "have
a right to know" exactly what happened Monday, he said, "and we
want to know, too."
© 2006 The Washington Post Company
Click on "comments" below to read or post comments -
Click Here For Comment Policy
Are Comments Offensive? Unsuitable? Email us