The question Grandin's piece raises is
this: Is a look into the past also a look
into the future? As the Iran-Contra moment
seeded our own second age of Bush, what will
this Bush moment bequeath us? What cast of
characters, another decade or two down the
line will emerge to take that grim second
bow? For those who care for some deeper
background on that 1980s moment and our own,
don't miss Grandin's superb new book,
Empire's Workshop, a history of the
American imperial presence in Latin America;
but even more compellingly, a history of
how, in relation to that region, the New
Right first was stirred into a combustible
political brew. Tom
The Swift Boating of America
By Greg Grandin
An illegal war, torture rooms,
warrantless wiretapping, manipulated
intelligence, secret prisons,
disinformation planted in the press,
graft, and billions of reconstruction
dollars gone missing: just when it
seemed that the Bush administration had
reached its corruption quota comes a new
scandal. This one is a bribery case
involving defense contractors,
Republican congressmen, prostitutes,
secret Hawaiian getaways, Scottish
castles, and -- wait for it -- the
Watergate Hotel. At its center is the
just ex-Executive Director of the CIA,
Kyle "Dusty" Foggo, whose sole
qualification for being appointed to
that post by just ex-Director Porter
Goss seems to have been his ability,
while head of the Agency's Frankfurt
post, to hand out bottled-water
contracts to friends and show junketing
politicians a good time.
Don't fret though if you are having
trouble separating this particular crime
from other Republican offenses. There's
a good reason -- they're all one
scandal, part of the same wave of
militarism, fraud, and ideology that has
swamped American politics of late. While
this wave of scandal seems now to be
heading for tsunami proportions, its
first swells date back decades. Just
take a look at Dusty's
résumé.
After his zealotry got him booted
from Sears' security and the
San Diego police department, Foggo
drew on his collegiate Young Republican
connections to land a job in the early
1980s with the CIA. His first mission
was in Honduras, then the staging ground
for Ronald Reagan's secret paramilitary
war against Nicaragua's leftist
Sandinista government. In addition to
his official duties, Foggo helped his
old college buddy Brent Wilkes -- the
defense contractor now implicated in the
ongoing bribery case involving former
Republican Congressman Randy "Duke"
Cunningham -- bring conservative cadres
down to Central America. There, he
introduced them to anti-Sandinista
rebels, better known as Contras. It
seems that, even then, a lot more than
anti-Communist solidarity was on the
agenda. Three of Wilkes' former friends
now claim that these trips included
partying with prostitutes.
A New Right Mecca
Dusty, of course, is not the only
veteran of Reagan's Central American
policy who has resurfaced to help fight
George W. Bush's "Global War on Terror."
The list includes John Negroponte,
Elliot Abrams, Otto Reich, John
Poindexter, John Bolton, Oliver North,
Robert Kagan, and Michael Ledeen. They
can also be found in the highest levels
of the White House: Dick Cheney cut his
political teeth in Congress in the 1980s
plumping for Reagan's Nicaragua policy,
thundering that any attempt to
prohibit Contra aid was a legislative
"abuse of power." And on the frontlines,
James Steele, who led the Special Forces
mission in El Salvador and worked with
North to
run weapons and supplies to the
Contras,
was sent to Iraq to help train a
ruthless counterinsurgency force made up
of ex-Baathist thugs. (Steele is batting
two for two: As in El Salvador, such
training has produced not security but
widespread death-squad atrocities.)
Just as progressives from the United
States traveled to Nicaragua in the
1980s to support the Sandinistas,
militants of the ascendant Reagan
Revolution flocked to Honduras as well
as El Salvador and Guatemala, where
staunchly anti-Communist regimes were
waging ruthless counterinsurgencies that
resulted in the murder of over 260,000
people. Dig a bit into the past of any
of the thousands of religious or secular
movement conservatives who came up in
those years and odds are, as with Dusty,
you'll find they played some role in
Central America.
Central America became a New Right
mecca because it was the one place where
conservatives could match words to
deeds. Reagan swept into office
promising to restore America's pride and
purpose in the post-Vietnam world. But
the complexities of the Cold War often
forced a more equivocating diplomacy on
him than he had promised his followers.
There was unexpected conciliation (he
befriended Soviet leader Mikhail
Gorbachev) and deep humiliation (the
withdrawal of American troops from
Lebanon after a devastating car
bombing). By midpoint in his second
term, the Right had had enough of what
they considered Reagan's timidity,
condemning their President as an
appeaser and a "useful idiot" for his
evident willingness to negotiate
nuclear-arms reductions with Moscow.
But on Central America, of little
geopolitical importance in itself, there
would be no conciliation or humiliation.
Based on policies designed and executed
by the hardest of hardliners in his
administration, Reagan's unwavering
patronage of death-squad states in El
Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras, and
his backing of anti-Communist "freedom
fighters" in Nicaragua gathered the
disparate passions of the conservative
movement -- of all those obscure Dusty
Foggos -- into a single mission. It also
turned Central America into a sinkhole
of fanaticism and murder.
Enter Ollie North
Many of those who traveled down to
Central America were Young Turk
Republicans who would preside over the
right-wing radicalization and corruption
of the House of Representatives under
Reagan in the 1980s and during the
Gingrich insurgency of the 1990s. San
Diego Representative
Bill Lowery, for example, first
elected to the House in 1980 at the
tender age of thirty-three, traveled in
the Foggo and Wilkes Honduran road show,
part of a Republican task force
organized to help sell Reagan's Contra
war against the Sandinistas to a
skeptical Congress and public. After
leaving office, Lowery, who has
floated around the edges of every
Republican scandal from the Savings and
Loan collapse of the 1980s to the recent
Jack Abramoff lobbying case, and is now
reportedly under investigation by the
Justice Department, went on to become a
top lobbyist, skilled in the art of
"earmarking."
The corruption represented by Foggo,
Wilkes, and Duke Cunningham is an
integral part of what President Dwight
Eisenhower termed the
"military-industrial complex." And it
goes hand-in-hand with war-making. If we
didn't have an enemy to fight, how could
we justify spending all that money on
defense, not to mention on the hookers
and poker that went with the lobbying
parties?
But in the wake of Vietnam, just as
Foggo's generation of conservatives was
beginning to taste power, the Democratic
Congress, along with the State
Department and even much of the
Pentagon, was not in a fighting mood.
Congress had enacted a slew of laws, set
up oversight committees, and designed
prohibitions to limit the White House's
ability to wage war and execute covert
actions. Congress now claimed the power
to regulate presidential decisions
related to military aid, arms sales, and
the sending of troops abroad; it also
demanded that the CIA inform up to eight
committees of its activities. Banned
were peacetime assassinations of foreign
leaders, as were covert operations
against American citizens at home. Worse
yet, the USSR, the "evil empire," was
proving to be an uncooperative opponent
-- or rather, it was being too
cooperative, willing to negotiate on a
range of security issues. In order to
implement a policy of "rollback," as the
neocons and militarists wanted to do,
one needed an enemy to rollback.
Enter Colonel Ollie North, then an
aide to the National Security Council --
and the rest of the Iran-Contra gang. It
was twenty years ago this November that
a story broke in the press revealing a
secret sale, brokered by North, of
thousands of high-tech missiles to
Ayatollah Khomeini's Iran at a greatly
inflated price, with the profits
laundered through a rogue's gallery of
unsavory middlemen – Iranian
expatriates, Israeli-arms dealers,
right-wing mercenaries, anti-Communist
client states like Saudi Arabia,
Moonies, and drug runners -- to bypass a
congressional prohibition on military
aid to the Contras.
No One Left Behind
What became known as "Iran-Contra,"
however, was much more than an illegal
arms deal. It was the New Right's first
concerted campaign to restore to the
executive branch the power to wage
unaccountable war, to override
congressional scrutiny, and go on the
ideological and military offensive in a
place where, unlike in Vietnam, there
was no major power to get in the way.
Democratic and public opposition to
the Contras, which was strong, proved to
be a blessing in disguise for the
conservative movement. It forced the
White House to rely on its social base
to execute its "off-the-books"
Nicaraguan war, thus thickening the
connections between diverse New Right
groups. It created a dense network of
intellectuals, action groups, and social
movements, uniting mainstream
conservatives with militants from the
carnivalesque Right. Urbane
sophisticates like Ambassador to the UN
Jeanne Kirkpatrick and businessmen like
Rite-Aid heir Lewis Lehrman (today a
member of the infamous neocon
Project for the New American Century)
made common cause with Soldier of
Fortune wet-op lunatics, Sunbelt
evangelical capitalists like Pat
Robertson, and end-timers like
Tim LaHaye (who, long before he hit
the best-seller lists with his Left
Behind series, was hawking Reagan's
Central American crusade to the
evangelical rank-and-file).
In Washington, the first generation
of neoconservatives, in alliance with
politicized Vietnam vets like North who
took second-tier positions in the Reagan
administration, created an inter-agency
war party that allowed them to move
forward with support for the Contras
despite congressional opposition. The
shadowy infrastructure of Iran-Contra,
designed to override more cautious area
experts in the State Department and the
CIA, who opposed Contra funding,
foreshadowed Douglas Feith's scheming
Office of Special Plans, which cooked
the intelligence and helped manipulate
the media to make the case for the 2003
invasion of Iraq. In fact, a key Feith
advisor, neocon intellectual Michael
Ledeen, who in the 1980s worked the
Israeli angle of the Iran-Contra affair,
has recently helped to rehabilitate his
old buddy and fellow Iran-Contra
luminary, the habitual liar Manucher
Ghorbanifar, as a credible proponent of
"regime change" in Iran. (There are even
reports that the Pentagon, with Dick
Cheney's backing, has just put
Ghorbanifar on the U.S. payroll.)
It was over Central America that New
Right ideologues first began to junk
multilateralism. When the International
Court of Justice ordered that the United
States pay Nicaragua billions of dollars
in reparations for mining the country's
principle port and for conducting an
illegal war of aggression, Washington
balked and withdrew from the Court's
jurisdiction. It was a "watershed
moment,"
according to legal scholar Eric Posner,
in the U.S. relationship with the
international community, one that Bush's
Ambassador to the UN John Bolton has
cited as evidence for why the U.S.
should not support the new International
Criminal Court.
In the field, Reagan's Central
American wars provided a way to
reactivate CIA and Pentagon
counterinsurgency operatives, desk-bound
since the U.S. was kicked out of
Southeast Asia, coordinating their work
with private mercenaries, conservative
(often evangelical) financiers, and a
rising Christian fundamentalist
movement.
So even as the military high command
was taking steps to prevent another
Vietnam from happening by attempting to
limit the use of American troops to
clearly defined objectives with clearly
defined exit strategies, civilian
ideologues and militarists in Central
America were pushing in the opposite
direction. In El Salvador, they were
funding the largest nation-building
counterinsurgency since Vietnam; while
in Nicaragua -- where they were hailing
rapists, torturers, and murderers as
"the moral equivalents of our founding
fathers" -- they were advancing a vision
of military power used not for specific
ends but to launch what they today call
a "democratic global revolution."
Watch Out, John Murtha
As does today's "War on Terror,"
Iran-Contra had a domestic front, which
helped to normalize the kind of media
manipulation, political harassment, and
domestic surveillance that has since
become commonplace in Bush's America.
Staffed with psych warfare operatives
from the CIA and the Army's Fourth
Psychological Operations Group, the
Office of Public Diplomacy, set up in
1983 and headed by Otto Reich, carried
out a massive campaign of media
deception. Working with polls conducted
by Madison-Avenue PR firms, the office
provided emotive talking points to
government officials, pundits, and
scholars, linking the Sandinistas to any
number of world evils: terrorism, Soviet
nuclear submarines, religious and ethnic
persecution, Cuba's Castro, East
Germans, Bulgarians, PLO leader Arafat,
Libyan dictator Qadhafi, Iran's
Ayatollah Khomeini, even Germany's
Baader-Meinhof Gang -- claims as false
as, yet no less effective than, those
now famous sixteen words in
Bush's State of the Union Address of
2003 that pinned the yellowcake tail on
the Iraqi donkey.
It was through Reich's Office of
Public Diplomacy that the White House
mobilized grassroots conservative
organizations not just to supply
anti-Communist rebels with arms, bibles,
medicine, and food, but to go after
congressional and media critics. Here
began the "swift boating" of American
politics -- distinct from 1950s
McCarthyism in that it was actually
orchestrated and funded by the executive
branch.
For instance, New Right militants,
advised by PR experts under government
contract, focused much of their work on
unseating the congressional
anti-militarists elected in the wake of
the Vietnam disaster, particularly those
who opposed Reagan's Central American
policy. If you "cross" Reagan, said a
Republican aide, "they're going to carve
you up publicly." That's what happened
to Maryland Democratic Congressman
Michael Barnes during a failed
Senatorial bid. He fell victim to a
smear campaign organized by
International Business Communication, a
Republican PR firm that worked closely
with Public Diplomacy and the
independent Anti-Terrorism American
Committee. "Destroy Barnes," said the
notes of one of the Committee's
operatives. Watch out, John
Murtha.
It was also in defense of Reagan's
Central American policies that the
various branches of the country's
intelligence agencies joined forces to
intimidate domestic dissenters,
anticipating many of the practices --
FBI and CIA file-sharing, for instance
-- that would be institutionalized by
the Patriot Act and the creation of the
Office of the Director of National
Intelligence (filled by John Negroponte,
who presided over the Contra war as
ambassador to Honduras, where he
reportedly covered-up death-squad
murders). And the logic that today
justifies Gitmo contains more than a
whiff of Oliver North's
plan to suspend the Constitution and
place domestic opponents of the Contra
War in concentration camps.
The Swamp of Militarism and
Corruption
Like the Watergate scandal,
Iran-Contra started out as a small,
back-page newspaper story only to
explode into a major constitutional
crisis. Yet unlike Watergate, which
yielded a broad consensus regarding the
dangers of unchecked executive power,
Iran-Contra produced no closure. The
Tower Commission, appointed by Reagan,
focused on procedural issues related to
presidential control over the NSA;
Congress's investigation turned out to
be a mess; and the Special Prosecutor's
inquiry dragged on for years,
stonewalled by the Department of
Justice, with none other than John
Bolton taking the lead in playing
defense.
One reason neither the public, nor
the press, nor the political system ever
successfully came to terms with
Iran-Contra was the tendency of
reporters and government investigators
to get lost in a thicket of conspiracy,
to waste their energy tracing the tangle
of branches that they always hoped would
provide a clear map of the crime.
Aspects of Iran-Contra were certainly
criminal -- illegal arms sales to an
enemy nation to fund an illegal war; the
use of
drug traffickers to run supplies to
the Contras; money laundering; the
deployment of CIA operatives to
influence domestic opinion.
Yet, in a sense, the investigators
were all barking up the wrong tree. It
wasn't a conspiracy at all, but part of
a larger storm of ideological passion,
entwining economic interests and
political ambition, that delivered the
American system to the New Right.
Iran-Contra -- and Reagan's Central
American policy more broadly -- broke
down the tottering levees of a foreign
policy already discredited from failure
in Vietnam, creating the swamp in which
militarism and corruption thrive. Until
it is recognized as such, it will
continue to suck us down, even as odd
pieces of flotsam like Foggo, Wilkes,
and Cunningham continue to rise to the
surface.
Greg Grandin teaches Latin
American history at New York University
and is the author of
Empire's Workshop: Latin America, The
United States, and The Rise of the New
Imperialism.
Are Comments Offensive? Unsuitable? Email us