The Bogus Take Back America Conference
By Charles Sullivan
06/16/06 "Information
Clearing House" -- -- A few weeks ago I received an invitation to
attend the Take Back America conference held in the nation’s
capital this week. It was a star-studded gala with some of the
Democratic Party’s most prominent luminaries, including Hillary
Clinton and John Kerry. What struck me funny about the
invitation, in a pathetic kind of way, was that both Clinton and
John Kerry were touted as progressives. I had to laugh aloud at
this news. But then it dawned on me that the people behind this
campaign were serious. Silly me! I chose not to attend, on the
excuse that I was donating all of my organs to science this
week.
If I understand the premise of the Take Back America Conference,
their agenda is to wrest control of the government from the
hands of the Republicans and to place power in the hands of the
Democrats. The assumption is, quite erroneous, I think, that
America will be a better place under the control of Hillary
Clinton and her corporate pay masters than the Bush cowboys and
their corporate cow patties. Given that the Democrats only
strategy seems to be capitulation, I fail to understand how this
is supposed to work.
The premise of the conference should have been to wrest power
from the hands of the capitalists and putting it in the hands of
the people where it belongs. But what am I thinking? Plutocrats
do not believe in the wisdom or the right of the people to
govern themselves or to work for the collective good. These are
socialist ideologies that place the welfare of the working
people above the greed of the corporations. We will not be
having any of that at this conference, or in this country, thank
you.
There were many things wrong with the Take Back America
Conference. Like most of the participants, Hillary Clinton was a
major supporter of the invasion and occupation of Iraq, as was
John Kerry. As is his habit, flip-flop Kerry has since reversed
his earlier stance and now speaks out against the criminal war.
I am not sure if this should be to Kerry’s credit or not. John
Kerry’s original stance as a presidential candidate was to send
more troops into harms way and to throw more gasoline onto the
fire. Sounds like a good way to get your beard singed to me! On
the other hand, Hillary Clinton has never possessed the wisdom,
humility, or the character to betray the ruling class to which
she belongs. Perhaps all those meetings with the corporate media
mogul, Ruppert Murdoch, are taking their toll.
But no matter; Hillary Clinton and John Kerry, as part of the
political mainstream (ruling class) of this country, and both of
them Plutocrats, are part of the problem, not the solution. Both
of them believe in and support Pax Americana, which is the core
of neoconservative thinking that got us into Iraq in the first
place. You could count the Democrats who vociferously oppose Pax
America on one hand, even if you lost several fingers in a table
saw accident.
Hillary Clinton is so in line with the Bush agenda of war
without end, including class warfare at home, that she could be
mistaken for the emperor’s shadow. She may even be more like
Bush than Bush himself, like the lining of a reversible jacket
that is cut from one cloth. Now, that’s a scary thought, isn’t
it? Perhaps Hillary is one of the pod people from the Invasion
of the Body Snatchers. Her shameless lust for power is both
lamentable and pathetic. It is also shallow and self serving. If
this is supposed to pass for opposition in America we are on our
way to hell and there will be no saving graces. Fire up the
barbecue, Lucifer; we’re on our way!
Lurking ever so slightly to the left of neoconservative
extremism does not a progressive make. By design, the terms
liberal and progressive are bandied about much too carelessly in
the corporate media. Progressivism stems from social values that
serve the welfare of the people, rather than the interest of the
ruling class and the corporations. By now it should be
abundantly clear whose interest the Republicrats serve. Hint: It
is not ours’.
By portraying politicos like Hillary Clinton and John Kerry as
liberals the corporate media is successfully moving the debate
farther to the right, as real progressives such as Cynthia
McKinney and Dennis Kucinich find ever fewer avenues for the
expression of ideas that fall outside of the political
mainstream. Thus, we find ourselves in a vice that is
continuously tightened around our vitals. Our eyes must be
popping out of our heads by now under the excruciating pressure.
There is precious little counter-veiling force to push things to
the left of the extreme right, back toward the center of the
political spectrum, let alone to the left of center. There is so
little visionary thinking, so little real debate.
All of this underscores the futility of political reform because
all of the viable players are under the supreme jurisdiction of
capital. Capital decides who the viable players will be and
capital decides the outcome of elections. Money controls every
aspect of the process and thus assures a result that is
favorable to business and detrimental to the commonwealth.
Predictably, the ugly head of censorship was also present at the
conference. Former Alaska Senator, Mike Gravel, a Democratic
presidential candidate in the upcoming 2008 elections, was
denied permission to speak. Why? Gravel challenged Richard Nixon
over the Pentagon Papers, the draft, and took on the Carlyle
Group. Smells like Socialism to me. Loose cannons (reds) will
not be tolerated by those who frame the message and finance the
elections. Capital will not allow viable opposition to emerge.
Talk about pre-emptive war!
The final insult came when only pre-screened reporters
representing the nation’s largest corporate newspapers were
permitted to conduct interviews with the attendees, by decree of
the conference organizers. By God, nothing revolutionary or
radical is going to come out of this dog and pony show! Consider
the message framed! Consider the result preordained!
Aside from its noble sounding title (PR hype), the Take Back
America Conference was long on rhetoric but short on substance.
And substance always transcends style. A Republicrat is still a
Republicrat, however it is framed. A Plutocrat is still a
Plutocrat and nothing of consequence changes. Capital is what
capital does. Let us see it for what it is.
One final note: If the Democrats were serious about taking back
America why do they show so little fight? Where was the
opposition during the Bush years? Where was the support for John
Conyers and Murtha?
Author’s note: Owing to a low gag threshold, I did not actually
attend the Take Back America Conference. First hand reports were
obtained from Wayne Madsen’s Website and live coverage on
satellite radio.
Charles Sullivan is a photographer, free lance writer and
social activist residing somewhere in the hinterland of West
Virginia.
Click on "comments" below to read or post comments -
Click Here For Comment Policy
Are Comments Offensive? Unsuitable? Email us