A Plea for Net Neutrality
By Charles Sullivan
06/18/06 "Information
Clearing House" -- -- The early days of radio and television
promised to bring enlightenment to the world. The public air
waves, we were told, would be used for the public good; as a
tool for education and for the spread of democracy. That has
simply not been the case. The public airwaves, like all things
public, were usurped by profit seeking capitalists to promote
commercialism, propaganda, and the privatization of profits. It
was another example of socialized cost and privatized profits
that are a characteristic of capitalism. Not only were the
public airwaves used as an instrument to exploit and to control
the masses, they were used to dumb down America. Entertainment
and consumerism quickly supplanted education and every other
form of social uplift that should have permeated the air waves.
It is important to understand that capitalism rarely works in
the public interest. Profit motive is the driving force. Any
public good that stems from it is purely accidental.
The corporate media that was long ago used as a weapon against
the people is still used to promulgate the lies and distortions
that have torn this nation asunder and set the world ablaze with
war and discord. The shameless promotion of the war in Iraq and
the brutal occupation of the Palestinian people by the Israeli
military are poignant examples. The commercial media is used
against us like a weapon to promote the most barbaric human
behavior and they are allowed to call it liberation, democracy,
and Christianity. Invading and occupying armies are called
liberators, while those defending their homes are labeled
insurgents and terrorists.
Beyond their use to promote war, both at home and abroad, the
public air waves are also used to endorse consumption on a grand
scale that is detrimental to the health of the planet, so that a
few get rich by exploiting the many.
So infected are the public airwaves with the lies and
distortions of capitalism and the military industrial complex,
that there is no room for the expression of opposing opinions or
dissent. The perspectives presented are so homogenized and
conformist as to be nearly indistinguishable from one another.
This mush is spoon fed into the malleable minds of the restless
consumer, if I may borrow a phrase from Neal Young, resulting in
a bloated corpse of humanity that is essentially brain dead and
unable to act in its own defense.
Enter the Internet, one of the last bastions for democracy and
the free and open exchange of ideas. The Internet provides a
place where people around the world can gather, share ideas,
enjoy a laugh, and seek truth. It is not perfect but it is a
resource that is pregnant with possibilities. It is one of the
last places where one can readily read dissenting points of view
that are no longer possible in the mainstream of corporate
reportage and synthesized news. Thank goodness we can still
gather at web sites like this and create a vision for a just and
peaceful future, as an alternative to war that will not end in
our lifetimes.
If the world’s largest telecommunications companies have their
way that will change. Currently, the complex series of ones and
zeroes that move at high speed through millions of miles of
cables and airwaves are treated equally—a byte is a byte is a
byte, whether yours, mine or Bill Gates’. The concept of net
neutrality stems from this principle. Telecommunications giants
such as AT&T, Verizon and Comcast want to change that by
creating a two-tiered superhighway—a technological toll road, if
you will. Users who pay additional fees, primarily corporate
clients promoting capitalism, would have unfettered access to
the fast lanes. The rest of us would, rather than being treated
as equals, become second class citizens stuck in the slowest
lanes with the poorest service. In the worst case scenario
service could be denied altogether.
The greatest danger is that the Internet would no longer be
free. The world’s largest telecommunications companies would
become the gatekeepers that control the flow of information and
ideas. Thus, web sites like this one might function so poorly,
because the corporate gate keepers do not approve of its
content, that they would essentially become unusable. Web sites
that provide a medium for writers who challenge the corporate
paradigm, such as the one you are now reading, could operate so
slow that they would lose all but the most loyal following.
In the familiar parlance of corporate speak the
telecommunications companies and their puppets in Congress, for
example, Alaska senator Ted Stevens, a republican, want us to
believe that net neutrality amounts to burdensome regulation
that stifles innovation and reduces corporate profits. The
supporters of the telecommunications bill making its way through
Congress are shameless promoters of predatory capitalism and
they should be impeached.
If net neutrality is defeated the result will be a familiar one
that characterizes all capitalist societies divided by class.
Once again, it will be those with money who get preferential
treatment. It will be much like our American coin operated
congress in which capital is equated to free speech. Those with
money will have access, those without will not.
It is dangerous to get between a Grizzly Bear and her cubs; but
it is far more dangerous to get between a capitalist and his
dollar. Men like Ted Stevens, who so typify Congress these days,
are a slave to his corporate pay masters. He does not serve the
interest of the people or the commonwealth any more than do
AT&T, Verizon and Comcast. Senator Steven’s abysmal voting
record speaks for itself. It is all about socializing cost and
privatizing wealth—predatory capitalism.
More information on net neutrality can be found at
www.savetheinternet.com
or
www.itsournet.org.
Charles Sullivan is a photographer, free lance writer and social
justice activist residing in the hinterland of West Virginia. He
welcomes your comments at
earthdog@highstream.net
Click on "comments" below to read or post comments -
Click Here For Comment Policy
Are Comments Offensive? Unsuitable? Email us