The Struggle
to Recapture our Soul
By Mike Whitney
06/18/06 "Information
Clearing House"
-- -- George Bush loves being the war
president. He loves popping up in Baghdad for a few
hours of male camaraderie with the newly-appointed Iraqi
Premier al-Maliki or strutting across an aircraft
carrier in a tight-fitting flight-suit. He loves showing
Papa-Bush that he can stay the course when things get
tough and that he won’t squander his “political capital”
by “cutting and running”.
But things are going the wrong way in Iraq and, by many
accounts, the war is already lost. Conservatives are
jumping off the bandwagon faster than liberals and
Bush’s approval ratings continue to plummet. Retired
General William Odom summarized the Iraq misadventure
best when he said, “It is the greatest strategic
disaster in US history.”
Bush’s photo-op in Baghdad only proves the wisdom of
Odom’s judgment. What looked like a triumphant visit by
the Commander-in-Chief to the heart of a war zone, was
actually a desperate attempt to garner support for a
failed mission.
The details of Bush’s junket are similar to his trip to
England last year, when he had to be surrounded by a
phalanx of 3,500 fully-armed security guards and
paramilitaries who shadowed his every move from the time
he touched down until the final lift-off. All the while,
a squadron of Apache helicopters and F-16s kept circling
overhead to ensure the Dear Leader’s safety. Providing
security in Iraq is equally daunting and extreme.
Three years after Bush’s “Mission Accomplished”, the
U.S. still does not control one inch of territory beyond
the pock-marked parapets and block walls of their
Baghdad fortress. Even within the Green Zone, security
is so stretched that Bush had to be spirited out of the
country a mere 5 hours after his arrival. What does that
tell the world about the magnitude of America’s failure?
Bush would never have put himself at risk by driving
through the battered landscape of downtown Baghdad. Just
like the Iraqi government and the American high-command,
his movements were limited to one small dot on the map
in central Baghdad; Bush’s citadel of “democracy”.
“My message to the Iraqis is this,” Bush boomed. ” We’re
going to help you succeed. My message to the enemy is:
Don’t count on us leaving before we succeed. My message
to our troops is: We support you 100%. Keep doing what
you’re doing. And my message to the critics is: We
listen very carefully and adjust, and adjust when we
need to adjust.”
Bush’s promises are absurd given the enormity of the
catastrophe he has unleashed. By every objective
standard, things were better under Saddam.
Never the less, the media gobbled up Bush’s photo-op
with their customary zeal. The visit was another
successful Karl Rove coup that probably nudged Bush’s
approval ratings upward. The pictures of smiley-faced
politicians glad-handing and chest-thumping appeared on
front pages across the country; adding to the festive
atmosphere that began with the killing of
terrorist-mastermind Abu al Zarqawi. But the war won’t
be won by the White House public relations team. People
are less disposed to the garish publicity stunts like
Bush’s diversionary trip to Baghdad. The long litany of
war crimes is finally wearing away at the fragile
American psyche.
Haditha, Falluja, Abu Ghraib; these are the names that
are now identified with Iraq and engraved in the
public’s consciousness. Their scars are bound to be felt
long after the war is over. Brand Bush is now
irreversibly linked to criminal renditions, abusive
treatment of prisoners, and massive slaughter. Even Rove
will have a hard time erasing those unpleasant factoids.
American elites are steadily abandoning their support
for the war. This is a significant development that will
eventually lead to an American withdrawal. Madeleine
Albright, Brent Scowcroft, William F Buckley, Richard
Holbrook are just some of the heavy-hitters who now see
the futility of pursuing the present policy. President
Jimmie Carter’s national security advisor, Zbigniew
Brzezinski has been particularly outspoken in his
criticism of the war and the failure to provide basic
security for the Iraqi people.
In an interview last week on the Jim Lehrer News Hour
Brzezinski said that the invasion “was not worth it” and
that it was a “major misadventure”.
“This is worse than the bad days of Vietnam…We do not
have a free and democratic government that is
functioning…The authority we have installed is besieged
and relatively helpless, and a civil war is beginning to
mushroom, under the occupation which is unable to crush
the insurgency, because it is a foreign occupation….We
no longer live in an age of colonialism. We no longer
have to assume the ‘white man’s burden’ in order to
‘civilize’ others.”
Brzezinski finished the interview by offering a 4-step
strategy for withdrawing from Iraq; something that the
Democratic leadership needs to do immediately.
1 Talk to the leadership about when to leave.
2 Set a date for withdrawal.
3 Let the government convene a conference of all Iraq’s
Muslim neighbors about stabilizing Iraq and helping it
to stabilize.
4 “Convene a donor’s conference of interested countries
in Europe and the Far East who benefit from Iraqi oil on
helping to rehabilitate Iraq. This would allow us to
leave and still say that we basically achieved what we
wanted—the removal of Saddam—though not providing a
secular, stable, united Iraq under a perfect democracy.”
Brzezinski poses realistic solutions for a situation
that will progressively deteriorate into anarchy. His
analysis cannot be easily dismissed. He is respected
among his peers as a hard-edged Machiavellian strategist
who is not given to flights of fancy. If he says the war
is over, it is not because of some deep sympathy he has
for the beleaguered Iraqi people, but because it is
“unwinnable” and damaging to America’s long-term
interests.
In an earlier interview, Brzezinski articulated his
belief that the war has been a “moral setback” for
America overshadowing everything else we are doing in
the world. He added that if we were unwilling to commit
500,000 troops and $200 billion a year, for an
unspecified amount of time then victory would probably
not be achievable.
He said, “There comes a point in the life of a nation
when such sacrifices are not justified…and only time
will tell if the United States is facing a moment of
wisdom, or is resigned to cultural decay”.
Brzezinski is right; America is at a crossroads. The
“moral squalor” of our political system has never been
more evident, and the empty rhetoric of our leaders’
never more vile. It’s more than just a matter of
extracting ourselves from the battlefield. Now, it’s a
struggle to recapture our soul.
Are Comments Offensive? Unsuitable? Email us