Let Asia deal with Kim Jong-Il
By Patrick J. Buchanan
07/09/06 "WorldNet"
-- -- -- That free fireworks display Kim Jong-Il put on
for our benefit on July Fourth may prove to have been the best day
George Bush has had since Zarqawi went to his eternal reward.
For years, Bush has been trying to persuade world opinion that Kim
is a psycho who cannot be trusted with nuclear weapons. By firing
off all those rockets into the Sea of Japan, Kim went a long way
toward convincing a hung jury that Bush may have a point. Kim has
also provided compelling evidence that missile defense may not be
such a silly right-wing idea after all.
Further good news is that the Taepodong-2, which is supposed to be
able to put a nuclear warhead on the United States, is years away
from being a serious threat. Having sat on the launch pad, fueled
and ready to go for two weeks, Kim's rocket burned 42 seconds before
plunging into the Sea of Japan. Whether the Taepodong was off
course, and North Korea blew it up, or it fizzled, we do not know.
But this is the first ICBM test by North Korea in eight years, and
it proved a bust.
Today, and for years to come, North Korea poses no missile threat to
the U.S. homeland. Indeed, the world market for North Korean
missiles probably tanked a bit on July 5, especially as one of Kim's
shorter-range rockets almost landed on Mother Russia.
To save the "face" he has lost, Kim is going to have to prove his
Taepodong-2 works, which means more testing – despite the wails of
the "international community."
Why is this good news? Because it is better to know than not to know
the character and capability of one's adversaries.
Not only has Kim's failed launch left him with egg on his face, he
made a fool of every patron he has in Asia. South Korea's president,
who has pursued a "sunshine policy" toward Pyongyang and planned a
state visit, implored Kim not to launch. He got the wet mitten
across the face.
The Chinese, which have been looking after Kim's interests in the
Six-Party Talks with the United States, and whose food and fuel
remain essential to Kim's survival, also asked him not to launch.
Kim dissed them, as well.
Beijing looks to the world today as having far less clout with their
little client state than they led the world to believe.
Japan warned Kim not to launch, as the last long-range missile he
tested flew directly over the Home Islands. Japan is now severing
aid and travel ties, looking hard at missile defense, moving closer
to the United States and probably considering its own nuclear
deterrent, none of which can make Pyongyang's patron, China, too
happy.
Wisely, Bush ignored ex-Secretary of Defense William Perry and
former Secretary of State Lawrence Eagleburger, who urged air or
cruise missile strikes to destroy the Taepodong on its launch pad.
Kim would have had to respond, perhaps with an artillery barrage on
the DMZ. That could have ignited a second Korean War, the last thing
America needs now.
If there is going to be a second Korean War, let Koreans fight it.
President Bush should also ignore the clamor for new sanctions. For
it is the weak, the women, the sick, the elderly and the infants who
invariably succumb to what Woodrow Wilson called "the silent, deadly
remedy," not self-indulgent dictators like Saddam and Kim Jong-Il or
their Praetorian Guard. The North Korean people have suffered enough
under Kim and his father. We ought not add to that suffering.
What should America do about Kim's provocative missile test? Follow
the example of Secretary of State Dean Rusk, who once told an
agitated undersecretary: "Don't just do something. Stand there."
America should step back and let the lesson sink in on Asia that,
though we are on the far side of the Pacific, we have been carrying
the load for the defense of South Korea and containment of the North
for 50 years. And we plan to lay the burden down. With the Cold War
over, America has no vital interest on the Korean peninsula to
justify sending another army to fight another war there. We ought to
get our soldier-hostages off the DMZ and bring them back to Guam, if
not all the way home to the United States.
Should North Korea attack the South or U.S. offshore bases in Asia,
we can respond with air and naval power from offshore. While the
North cannot strike our homeland, we can strike the North at will.
Kim and his nukes and missiles are primarily Asia's problem, not
ours. And it is time Asians assumed responsibility for their own
defense from a North Korea whose economy and population are small by
any standard. If South Korea's president wishes to play detente with
Kim Jong-Il, let Seoul assume the costs and bear the consequences if
he proves to be a Neville Chamberlain.
In his farewell address, 55 years ago, Gen. MacArthur urged America
to move her soldiers off the Asian mainland and set up our defense
perimeter in the offshore islands. Sound advice then, sound advice
now.
Pat Buchanan was twice a candidate for the Republican presidential
nomination and the Reform Party’s candidate in 2000. He is also a
founder and editor of The American Conservative. Now a political
analyst for MSNBC and a syndicated columnist, he served three
presidents in the White House, was a founding panelist of three
national TV shows, and is the author of seven books.
© 2006 Creators Syndicate Inc.
Click on "comments" below to read or post comments -
Click Here For Comment Policy
Are Comments Offensive? Unsuitable? Email us