One Giant Gaza Strip from the Caspian to the Red
Sea
By Mike Whitney
07/17/06 "Information
Clearing House" -- -- “We will not be the only ones
who pay a price. Our homes will not be the only ones destroyed. Our
children will not be the only ones killed. Our people will not be
the only ones displaced. Those days are over. …I promise you those
times have passed.” Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah, Leader of Lebanese
Resistance Organization Hezbollah
The last few days have provided a troubling view of the new world
order. The Israeli assault on Lebanon’s infrastructure has battered
bridges, roads, power-plants, grain depots, apartment buildings,
mosques, community centers, civilian homes, gas stations, ports and
many of the country’s critical life-support systems. Additionally,
Israel has killed 155 civilians including 15 children who were
instantly vaporized by a missile that destroyed their van while they
were fleeing southern Lebanon. Israel has justified the carnage by
pointing to the 2 soldiers who were captured by members of the
Lebanese resistance organization, Hezbollah. But Israel’s defense is
hopelessly flawed.
What if relatives or friends of the many US detainees who’ve been
illegally imprisoned at Guantanamo, decided to use F-16s and
laser-guided missiles to attack the Golden Gate Bridge, the Sears
Tower, New York City’s electrical grid, and vast swathes of the
highway system? Would that be equally justifiable? Or, more to the
point, what if Hezbollah decided to blow up major parts of Israel’s
infrastructure in retaliation for the hundreds of Lebanese prisoners
languishing in Israeli prisons without any legal recourse? Would
that be okay?
Israel’s rationale is merely an apology for state terrorism and it’s
utterly meaningless in respect to the enormous damage they’ve
caused.
What if the shoe was on the other foot? What if it was Israel’s
citizens who were locked away in Lebanese prisons? Would Israel
simply leave them to their fate?
Hezbollah wants their prisoners back as much as Israel and they’ve
shown a willingness to negotiate. Israel, however, has other things
in mind; flattening another Arab country and plunging them into the
Stone Age. This is the way Israel does business.
The history of the present conflict did not begin with the capture
of the 2 soldiers as the media would have us believe, nor is it
simply aimed at dismantling Hezbollah. Israel is planning to occupy
the territory between its northern border and the Litani River in
Southern Lebanon. This will provide access to an important water
source for Israel and create a buffer-zone between itself and Arab
militants. The demonstration of overwhelming force is intended to
send a message to Syria and Iran that they’d better “shape up” or
expect similar treatment in the near future.
"A Clean Break"
Israel’s present battle-plan originated with a policy paper that was
written by former Defense Policy Board chief Richard Perle and (Bush
administration officials) David Wurmser and Douglas Feith. The
document, which was titled “A
Clean Break; Strategy for Securing the (Israeli) Realm”
provides the details of Israel’s plan to topple potential rivals in
the region and redraw the map of the Middle East.
The text reads: “Securing the Northern Border;
Syria challenges Israel on Lebanese soil. An effective approach, and
one which America can sympathize, would be if Israel seize the
strategic initiative (preemption) along its northern borders by
engaging Hezbollah, Syria and Iran as the principle agents of
aggression in Lebanon including…striking military targets in
Lebanon, and should that prove insufficient, striking at striking at
select targets in Syria proper.”
Perle’s document outlines exactly what is presently taking place
even though it was written back in 1996. (It was composed for the
government of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.)
This shows that Israel is not acting irrationally or spontaneously,
but executing a carefully-considered master-plan for crushing
potential enemies and reconfiguring the Middle East to accommodate
the modern Israeli kingdom. (hence, the pretentious euphemism
“Securing the Realm”)
This is the war that Israel wanted from the very beginning; a final
showdown with arch-nemesis Hezbollah followed by confrontations with
Damascus and Tehran. It’s all in Perle’s blueprint for “total war”.
Prime Minister Olmert has not deviated one millimeter from the
original scheme.
George Bush’s appearance in St Petersburg suggests that there was
careful coordination between Tel Aviv and the White House so that
Israel could carry out its depredations in Lebanon while Bush kept
Putin occupied at the G-8 meetings. Eventually, Putin will realize
that Bush has taken him for a fool by diverting his attention from
events in the Middle East with bogus promises of membership in the
WTO. Bush has proven once again, that while he may not read the
newspapers, he is a shrewd Machiavellian-politician who is skillful
at manipulating situations to his own advantage.
We should review Lebanon’s recent history if we want to fully
appreciate the effort that has gone into preparing it for invasion.
The assassination of Rafik Hariri gave Israel and America the
perfect pretext for intervening in Lebanese affairs via the United
Nations. The public anger was effectively shifted onto Syria even
though the evidence of Syrian wrongdoing was inconclusive. The
public hysteria eventually led to UN resolutions against Syria which
forced Bashar Al-Assad to withdraw his troops and accept that
Syrian-patron, Prime Minister Lahoud would be replaced by the
more-compliant Fouad Siniora.
We know now that the “Cedar Revolution” was just another clever
“made-in-Washington” public relations scam orchestrated by skillful
American NGOs and Israeli intelligence agencies. The “color-coded”
revolutions have since been widely discredited as more of Uncle
Sam’s tricks for bringing about regime change in countries where the
leaders fail to conform to the economic diktats of the IMF and World
Bank.
Consider how opportune it has been for Israel to have Syrian forces
out of the way while they lay-waste to Lebanon destroying anything
in their path.
Coincidence???
Think again. Everything from Bush’s appearance in St Petersburg, to
the untimely death of Rafik Hariri, to the Cedar Revolution, to the
removal of Syrian troops has been as painstakingly choreographed as
a Bolshoi Ballet; all of it was mere preparation for the “Main
Event”, Israel’s triumphant reappearance on Lebanese soil, now
threatening to occupy the south for an unspecified period of time
and, perhaps, pushing east towards Damascus.
Could Lebanon have escaped Israel’s wrath if its soldiers had not
been captured by Hezbollah?
Not likely.
Israel’s has long planned to disarm Hezbollah and eliminate
potential conflicts on its northern flank. That means that if
Lebanon rebuilds and prospers once again, the threat of Israeli
attack will increase accordingly. Israel’s aspirations for regional
supremacy does not allow for strong neighbors.
It’s clear that the devastation in Lebanon is intended to send a
message to Damascus and Tehran. As Perle’s “A Clean Break” states,
Israel wants to frame “Hezbollah, Syria and Iran as the principle
agents of aggression in Lebanon”. The Israel-friendly media has
achieved this by reiterating claims that Hezbollah is a “cat’s paw”
for Syria and that Iran is providing high-tech weaponry for
resistance attacks against Israel. Both countries have denied the
allegations, but the stage has been set for a broader war that may
engulf the entire region. The probability of regime change in Tehran
and Damascus has only intensified as Bush and Olmert’s objectives
become more apparent. (Note: Israel needs a friendly government in
Syria to protect future pipeline routes from Northern Iraq to Haifa.
Currently the Mossad are working with the Kurds to ensure that
Israel will become a main player in the energy markets in the coming
century) Iran’s vast oil and natural gas wealth, make it the Middle
East’s natural leader. This ensures that the Mullahs will be
challenged and, perhaps, removed to allow for Israeli ascendancy.
The Impotent United Nations
As Israel steps-up its bombing raids on southern Beirut for the 6th
straight day, the UN has never looked more ineffective or
fragmented. The institution has been blocked from even providing its
normally toothless resolutions condemning the violence. The UN has
become a rubber stamp for American-Israeli policy; harassing
Washington’s enemies like Iran and North Korea while obstructing any
measure that threatens to curtail US-Israeli aggression. The massive
and calculated decimation of Lebanon; including the willful
destruction of critical infrastructure, proves that the UN is no
longer able to meet the minimal requirements of its original mandate
to stop unprovoked aggression. In its present configuration, the
United Nations is worse than useless; it is, in fact, abetting the
hostilities and providing cover for resurgent 21st century
colonialism. The present crisis could signal the death knell for the
beleaguered “world body” as more and more nations will be forced
into improvised security alliances to fend off Washington’s plans
for global domination.
Curious onlookers should note that Israel’s attacks have not been
aimed at Hezbollah, but mainly at Lebanese infrastructure. In fact,
there have been no reports of Hezbollah casualties so far. This is
no coincidence. Israel’s plan is to reduce Lebanon to rubble and
create a humanitarian crisis similar to the one in the occupied
territories. Throughout the Arab world the same theory of
“pacification” is being applied as Bush and Olmert continue their
wanton assault on the basic platforms for human survival leaving
millions of Muslims in abject poverty without food, medicine, clean
drinking water, or sufficient heat or light. They have created tens
of thousands of refugees who have been driven from their homes or
left in the ruins to slowly die in the dark. From the Caspian to the
Red Sea, from the Mediterranean to the western tip of Afghanistan,
Israel and America are spreading their devastation across the Middle
East transforming the entire region into one massive Gaza Strip.