Israel angry, US wary as Annan peace plan calls for ceasefire
By
Oliver Burkeman in New York and Ewen MacAskill
07/21/06 "The
Guardian" -- -- Kofi Annan, the UN secretary general,
mapped out a peace plan for Lebanon yesterday that produced a
lukewarm response from Washington and ill-concealed fury from
Israeli diplomats.
Speaking at the security council in New York, Mr Annan said an
"immediate cessation of hostilities" was "most urgent". He laid out
a plan encompassing an expanded UN peacekeeping force on Lebanon's
side of the border, along with the release of the captured Israeli
soldiers.
In a strongly worded address, Mr Annan criticised Hizbullah's
"provocative attack" and "reckless disregard for the interests of
the government of Lebanon". But he reserved his most detailed
condemnation for Israel's "excessive use of force", which was doing
"little or nothing to decrease popular support for Hizbullah in
Lebanon or the region".
A humanitarian crisis was engulfing Lebanon, and the number of
people affected by the conflict was likely to double to a million. A
far more credible Israeli effort to protect civilians and
infrastructure in the areas under attack was needed.
Military actions in southern Lebanon destabilised the country, and
thus "the very government which Israel wants to extend its control
through the territory has itself become a hostage to the crisis".
Mr Annan said his three-member delegation to the Middle East had
been told by Israeli leaders that their military goals were more
far-reaching than achieving the release of the captured soldiers,
and that "the operation is not yet approaching the achievement of
this objective".
A UN source said there was a sense of depression at the
organisation's headquarters. "There is a game of rhetoric in New
York versus bullets and bombs in Lebanon and Gaza. The Israelis want
time to eliminate Hizbullah. They do not care how long it takes."
The US has delayed diplomatic action. John Bolton, the US ambassador
to the UN, agreed yesterday that it was time for the security
council to start formulating a response, but repeated his assertion
that it was not practical to agree "a ceasefire with a group of
terrorists".
But Israel was ceding no ground. Dan Gillerman, the Israeli
ambassador to the UN, said his country's operation in Lebanon "will
take as long as it takes", and "a cessation of terrorism" had to
precede any "cessation of hostilities".
Mr Gillerman said "something very important was missing" from Mr
Annan's speech: any mention of terrorism. Hizbullah were "ruthless
indiscriminate animals", he told reporters. "We must first address
the core and the root cause of why these hostilities started in the
first place, and who started them ... If there's a ceasefire while
this cesspool continues to fester, we'll leave Hizbullah with the
capability to do time and time again what they've done this time."
Condoleezza Rice, the US secretary of state, was in New York
yesterday for a dinner with Mr Annan. She is expected to leave for
the Middle East today, and a security council diplomat said a UN
resolution on the crisis was unlikely before her return.
Agreement on the creation of an international force would take weeks
or even months, with discussions on whether to expand the existing
UN force on the Israel-Lebanon border, the 2,000-strong Unifil, to
create a new body or to send in a multinational force with a looser
connection to the UN. There would also be protracted debate over its
mandate, rules of engagement and size.
The UN is having increasing difficulty finding countries willing to
contribute troops to peacekeeping operations, in part because of a
five-fold rise in peacekeeping operations over the past eight years.
But the Italian government promised to contribute to a Lebanon
force. The French government, which heads Unifil and has 200
soldiers in the force, would almost certainly offer more.
Britain, overstretched by Iraq and Afghanistan, has ruled out
sending troops. Germany, though it might offer logistical support,
will not provide combat troops: its history rules out the
possibility of German soldiers confronting Israelis.
The Unifil force yesterday reported that there had been 31 incidents
of firing close to its positions in the previous 24 hours
© Guardian Newspapers Limited 2006