Israel set war plan more than a year ago
Strategy was put in motion as Hezbollah began increasing its
military strength
By Matthew Kalman, Chronicle Foreign Service
07/21/06 "San
Francisco Chronicle" -- -- Jerusalem -- Israel's
military response by air, land and sea to what it considered a
provocation last week by Hezbollah militants is unfolding according
to a plan finalized more than a year ago.
In the years since Israel ended its military occupation of southern
Lebanon, it watched warily as Hezbollah built up its military
presence in the region. When Hezbollah militants kidnapped two
Israeli soldiers last week, the Israeli military was ready to react
almost instantly.
"Of all of Israel's wars since 1948, this was the one for which
Israel was most prepared," said Gerald Steinberg, professor of
political science at Bar-Ilan University. "In a sense, the
preparation began in May 2000, immediately after the Israeli
withdrawal, when it became clear the international community was not
going to prevent Hezbollah from stockpiling missiles and attacking
Israel. By 2004, the military campaign scheduled to last about three
weeks that we're seeing now had already been blocked out and, in the
last year or two, it's been simulated and rehearsed across the
board."
More than a year ago, a senior Israeli army officer began giving
PowerPoint presentations, on an off-the-record basis, to U.S. and
other diplomats, journalists and think tanks, setting out the plan
for the current operation in revealing detail. Under the ground
rules of the briefings, the officer could not be identified.
In his talks, the officer described a three-week campaign: The first
week concentrated on destroying Hezbollah's heavier long-range
missiles, bombing its command-and-control centers, and disrupting
transportation and communication arteries. In the second week, the
focus shifted to attacks on individual sites of rocket launchers or
weapons stores. In the third week, ground forces in large numbers
would be introduced, but only in order to knock out targets
discovered during reconnaissance missions as the campaign unfolded.
There was no plan, according to this scenario, to reoccupy southern
Lebanon on a long-term basis.
Israeli officials say their pinpoint commando raids should not be
confused with a ground invasion. Nor, they say, do they herald
another occupation of southern Lebanon, which Israel maintained from
1982 to 2000 -- in order, it said, to thwart Hezbollah attacks on
Israel. Planners anticipated the likelihood of civilian deaths on
both sides. Israel says Hezbollah intentionally bases some of its
operations in residential areas. And Hezbollah's leader, Hassan
Nasrallah, has bragged publicly that the group's arsenal included
rockets capable of bombing Haifa, as occurred last week.
Like all plans, the one now unfolding also has been shaped by
changing circumstances, said Eran Lerman, a former colonel in
Israeli military intelligence who is now director of the Jerusalem
office of the American Jewish Committee.
"There are two radical views of how to deal with this challenge, a
serious professional debate within the military community over which
way to go," said Lerman. "One is the air power school of thought,
the other is the land-borne option. They create different dynamics
and different timetables. The crucial factor is that the air force
concept is very methodical and almost by definition is slower to get
results. A ground invasion that sweeps Hezbollah in front of you is
quicker, but at a much higher cost in human life and requiring the
creation of a presence on the ground."
The advance scenario is now in its second week, and its success or
failure is still unfolding. Whether Israel's aerial strikes will be
enough to achieve the threefold aim of the campaign -- to remove the
Hezbollah military threat; to evict Hezbollah from the border area,
allowing the deployment of Lebanese government troops; and to ensure
the safe return of the two Israeli soldiers abducted last week --
remains an open question. Israelis are opposed to the thought of
reoccupying Lebanon.
"I have the feeling that the end is not clear here. I have no idea
how this movie is going to end," said Daniel Ben-Simon, a military
analyst for the daily Haaretz newspaper.
Thursday's clashes in southern Lebanon occurred near an outpost
abandoned more than six years ago by the retreating Israeli army.
The place was identified using satellite photographs of a Hezbollah
bunker, but only from the ground was Israel able to discover that it
served as the entrance to a previously unknown underground network
of caves and bunkers stuffed with missiles aimed at northern Israel,
said Israeli army spokesman Miri Regev.
"We knew about the network, but it was fully revealed (Wednesday) by
the ground operation of our forces," said Regev. "This is one of the
purposes of the pinpoint ground operations -- to locate and try to
destroy the terrorist infrastructure from where they can fire at
Israeli citizens."
Israeli military officials say as much as 50 percent of Hezbollah's
missile capability has been destroyed, mainly by aerial attacks on
targets identified from intelligence reports. But missiles continue
to be fired at towns and cities across northern Israel.
"We were not surprised that the firing has continued," said Tzachi
Hanegbi, chairman of the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense
Committee. "Hezbollah separated its leadership command-and-control
system from its field organization. It created a network of tiny
cells in each village that had no operational mission except to wait
for the moment when they should activate the Katyusha rocket
launchers hidden in local houses, using coordinates programmed long
ago to hit Nahariya or Kiryat Shemona, or the kibbutzim and
villages."
"From the start of this operation, we have also been active on the
ground across the width of Lebanon," said Brig. Gen. Ron Friedman,
head of Northern Command headquarters. "These missions are designed
to support our current actions. Unfortunately, one of the many
missions which we have carried out in recent days met with slightly
fiercer resistance."
Israel didn't need sophisticated intelligence to discover the huge
buildup of Iranian weapons supplies to Hezbollah by way of Syria,
because Hezbollah's patrons boasted about it openly in the pages of
the Arabic press. As recently as June 16, less than four weeks
before the Hezbollah border raid that sparked the current crisis,
the Syrian defense minister publicly announced the extension of
existing agreements allowing the passage of trucks shipping Iranian
weapons into Lebanon.
But to destroy them, Israel needed to map the location of each
missile.
"We need a lot of patience," said Hanegbi. "The (Israeli Defense
Forces) action at the moment is incapable of finding the very last
Katyusha, or the last rocket launcher primed for use hidden inside a
house in some village."
Moshe Marzuk, a former head of the Lebanon desk for Israeli Military
Intelligence who now is a researcher at the Institute for
Counter-Terrorism in Herzliya, said Israel had learned from past
conflicts in Lebanon, the West Bank and Gaza -- as well as the
recent U.S. experiences in Afghanistan and Iraq -- that a
traditional military campaign would be countereffective.
"A big invasion is not suitable here," said Marzuk. "We are not
fighting an army, but guerrillas. It would be a mistake to enter and
expose ourselves to fighters who will hide, fire off a missile and
run away. If we are to be on the ground at all, we need to use
commandos and special forces."
Since fighting started
-- Israeli air strikes on Lebanon have hit more than 1,255 targets,
including 200 rocket-launching sites.
-- Hezbollah launched more than 900 rockets and missiles into
northern Israel.
-- At least 317 Lebanese have been killed, including 20 soldiers and
three Hezbollah guerrillas. Lebanese Prime Minister Fuad Saniora
says 1,100 have been wounded; the police put the number at 657.
-- 31 Israelis have been killed, among them 16 soldiers, according
to Israeli authorities. At least nine soldiers and 344 civilians
have been wounded.
-- Foreign deaths include eight Canadians, two Kuwaiti nationals,
one Iraqi, one Sri Lankan and one Jordanian.
©2006 San Francisco Chronicle