While Lebanon burns - A message from Beirut
By Farouk Mawlawi
07/22/06 "Information
Clearing House" -- -- Aside from one's views on Hizbollah's capture
of two Israeli soldiers for the purpose of exchanging them for
Lebanese prisoners in Israeli jails, some of whom have spent quarter
of a century there, the international community must face the fact
that Israel's response has been anything but excercising "its right
to defend itself". Indeed Israel's barbarous aerial and naval attack
on Lebanon over the past nine days clearly shows a design to
terrorize the population and to inflict maximum damage on the
country by destroying much of its infrastructure. Considering that
many of those killed remain under the rubble of their homes where
they cannont be reached, the death toll has surpassed the 400 figure
with four times that number injured. Over half a million have been
displaced, many of whom encountered horrific escapes from Israeli
shelling. The human tragedy is mounting by the hour and its
magnitude is lost on those who oppose a cease-fire, professing that
Israel needs more time to finish the job. The irony here is that
Hizbollah's losses remain extremely minimal while the civilian
population bears the brunt of the human and material losses.
If Israel wants only to recover its soldiers and "eliminate the
threat of Hizbollah" why destroy every bridge, render every road
impassable and literally dismember the country. Why repeatedly shell
the runways at Beirut's International Airport when it has been
rendered inoperable. Why destroy every moving and even stationary
truck and prevent the delivery of food and medicine to cut-off
villages. Why destroy every fuel storage facility when most people
have become dependent on power generators for electricity. Why
repeatedly shell the biggest bridge in the Middle East which is the
main link in the inter-Arab highway network. Why repeatedly shell
civil communication towers and antennas, and why target industrial
plants including those at dairy and poultry farms. The list of
violations of international law and the Geneva Agreements is a long
one, and clearly amount to war crimes under any free judicial
system.
Prime Minister Fuad Seniora has made an impassioned appeal for a
cease-fire and repeatedly called on influential governments, notably
the United States, to exert influence to that end. UN Secretary
General Kofi Annan called for an immediate cease-fire in his report
to the Security Council, as did several world leaders, notably
French President Chirac. But, while Lebanon burns, the US Congress
unashamedly declares its support for Israel's war on the country,
and the Administration bides its time, conveniently forgetting
President Bush's pronouncements in favor of Prime Minister Seniora
and the democratic Government of Lebanon. Indeed there seems to be
no end to double standards and broken commitments.