07/12/06 "ZNet"
-- --
Noam and Carol Chomsky arrived in Beirut on May 8, 2006,
for an eight-day visit, their first ever to Lebanon.
Many of Noam's friends had wanted this visit to happen
for a long time. The Palestinians, the south of Lebanon,
and the wider Middle East and its peoples have all been
central among Noam's many concerns. He has written about
them and defended them, publicly and tirelessly, for
nearly four decades, and will continue "as long as I'm
ambulatory."[1] Beirut would give Noam Chomsky a hero's
welcome, and it did with relish.
An invitation
from the American University in Beirut provided the
occasion. Noam would give two lectures at the AUB on two
consecutive days, May 9 and 10, and then the rest of the
eight-day stay would be devoted to meeting people and
visiting places.[2] The non-AUB part of the visit would
be organized by writer, political activist and long-time
friend Fawwaz Trabulsi, with help from me.
Noam's visit
came at a time of heightened tension in Lebanon and
renewed violence in the Palestinian territories and in
Iraq. What is mostly recalled in the Western media of
Lebanese events in recent months is perhaps the
assassination of former Lebanese prime minister Rafiq
Hariri on February 14, 2005, followed by several massive
demonstrations in Beirut during the Spring of 2005,
which were a major factor in forcing the withdrawal of
Syrian troops at the end of April 2005, twenty-nine
years after they first entered Lebanon at the beginning
of the civil war. Hariri's assassination is still under
investigation by a UN-appointed commission. Hariri was a
prominent opponent of a three-year extension of Emile
Lahoud's presidential mandate, from November 2004 to
November 2007, resulting from a constitutional amendment
that had been engineered by the Syrian government both
by intimidation and through its own allies in the
Lebanese parliament. In protest, Hariri resigned from
the cabinet premiership in October 2004 and joined an
increasingly militant anti-Syrian opposition, whose most
vocal leader was Walid Jumblat.
The huge
demonstrations in the Spring of 2005 were fueled not
only by long-simmering resentment of heavy-handed Syrian
domination, but also by a stagnant economy reflected by
a staggering national debt estimated at around 40
billion dollars, amounting to more than 180 % of the
country's GDP, the highest ratio anywhere in the world.
If anything, these demonstrations showed a deep popular
demand for change, shared by wide strata of the
population, mobilizing more than a half million people
(on March 8, 2005) and three quarters of a million (on
March 14, 2005) in a country with a population under 4
million . But the political elites were divided, chiefly
according to what they perceive as the main external
threat to Lebanon. The organizers of the March 8
demonstration, led by Hizbullah, consider the chief
danger to come from Israeli incursions and regional
designs, backed up by a totally unfettered US policy to
reshape the Middle East political map under the Bush
administration; on the other hand, the organizers of the
March 14 demonstration, including Walid Jumblat and
others among Rafiq Hariri's allies, argue that the
Lebanese have to first free themselves from the danger
in their midst -- namely, Syria's continued meddling
through its local allies and the security agencies it
created or molded during its 29-year military presence
-- before they can tackle their other problems,
including Israeli threats.
Since Spring
2005, political alliances have shifted somewhat, with a
few defections from one side or the other, but the
"March 8" and "March 14" coalitions remain the two main
contending poles, at least within the political
establishment. As for the extra-parliamentary left,
represented by the Communist Party and several other
allied groups, they seemed at first eclipsed by the
overwhelming events of that Spring. More recently,
however, the Communist Party and its allies have taken a
more assertive role and tended to side with Hizbullah
and the "March 8" coalition, without being part of it,
while a few dissidents have split and are part of the
"March 14" coalition.
Fawwaz
Trabulsi prepared a packed and also, rather
inadvertently, an emotionally charged program of
activities beyond the AUB lectures. Noam and Carol spent
an entire morning in the Sabra-Shatila refugee camp on
the outskirts of Beirut, travelled to the
Lebanese-Israeli border region, visited the former
Israeli prison and torture compound in the town of Khiam
in southern Lebanon, and had lengthy meetings with
Hizbullah leaders (from the "March 8" coalition), with
parliamentarian Walid Jumblat and lawyer Chibli Mallat
(from the "March 14" coalition), and with leaders of the
Communist Party. In a seminar at the Lebanese American
University on "Palestine 1948", hosted by Fawwaz
Trabulsi, Noam engaged the students in a discussion of
Zionism and the history of the Israeli-Palestinian
conflict. Noam also gave dozens of interviews, for
newspapers and TV stations, both Lebanese and
non-Lebanese.
In addition
to the two AUB lectures to eager overflow crowds, Noam
gave a third talk to a packed audience at Masrah al
Madina, a large movie theatre in Beirut. This latter
event was organized by al Liqaa (the
"Encounter"), a progressive cultural association,
introduced by its president Ghassan Issa, and chaired by
Fawwaz Trabulsi. Entitled "Imminent Crises: Threats and
Opportunities," it dealt with current dangers resulting
from American interventionist zeal in the Middle East.
Just as
significant as the planned activities were countless
chance encounters with people -- in the street, in the
hotel lobby, on the way to a lecture or after, at a
meeting enlarged to include other eager participants --
who would invariably give Noam a warm welcome: a
Palestinian pharmacist in his makeshift drugstore in
Sabra-Shatila, a Palestinian labor leader, a former
Lebanese cabinet minister, a man rushing to get an
inscription on a freshly-bought copy of Noam's Failed
States, and many others.
Several
Memorable Moments
Fawwaz
Trabulsi, Irene Gendzier[3] and I accompanied Noam and
Carol Chomsky throughout their stay May 8-16, as did at
various times journalists and filmmakers who documented
the trip. A small selection from our collective travel
notes:
May 11,
Sabra-Shatila camp.
At the
vocational center run by Najda, a Palestinian aid
and relief association, there are two young university
graduates, a Briton and a Palestinian, who volunteer to
teach teenagers how to use computers and connect to the
Internet. The Briton will soon return to the UK, having
completed one year working in the camp. The Palestinian
volunteer has a degree in computer science from one of
the Lebanese universities, but has not yet found any
employment. A conversation ensues between Noam and the
young Palestinian. Noam asks who paid for his university
education (UNRWA, a UN agency, paid), whether he looked
for a job outside the camp (he did, but in vain), why no
one hired him (employers seemed to prefer Lebanese
graduates). "And what, in the long run, if you don't
find a job?" Noam asks. "I hope to leave Lebanon," he
says, then with a faint smile, "Maybe I will become like
Edward Said."
May 11,
Sabra-Shatila camp.
There is a
plot of land of perhaps less than a half acre,
surrounded by a wall with a large iron gate, where the
victims of the 1982 massacre are buried.[4] The land is
mostly flat and covered by grass, with a few mounds here
and there, the locations of mass graves which we can see
through the gate's vertical bars. On the outside wall
there are large, slightly fading, poster photos of those
found dead after the rampage of Phalangist militiamen
that were sent in by the Israeli army that had
surrounded the camp in 1982. The gate-keeper is an old
Palestinian, with half of his teeth missing, sitting
under the shade of the tree near the gate and selling
flowers. We ask him to open the gate and let us enter
the ground. The old man says that if the visitors are
American he will not let them enter. "Yes, the visitors
are American, but they are good Americans," I explain.
Then pointing to Noam a few steps away, I say that he,
in particular, is the most indefatigable defender of
Palestinian rights in America. The old man stares at me
with a skeptical look for a few seconds, as if to gauge
the truth of what I just said, then gets up and opens
the gate.
May 11,
Hizbullah headquarters, Beirut.
We meet
Sayyid Hassan Nasrallah, the head of Hizbullah, in a
heavily fortified compound. Hizbullah has widespread
popular support, with representation in the Lebanese
parliament and the council of ministers, largely the
result of its role in the successful resistance to the
Israeli occupation of southern Lebanon in the 1990's.
Nevertheless, American government officials -- from
Condoleezza Rice, David Welch, Elliott Abrams, Jeffrey
Feltman and on down -- routinely visit other Lebanese
politicians and dignitaries, never Nasrallah, and they
portray Hizbullah as a band of terrorists. The value of
this meeting with Noam is as much in what Nasrallah has
to say as in the public recognition by a public
American, admittedly the most dissident of them, of
Hizbullah's role in Lebanon and the Middle East at
large. Nasrallah recognizes the value of trying to break
the official American embargo: He has no objection to
Noam quoting him on anything he has said, and his last
question to Noam is a request for advice on what
Hizbullah can do to counter the pernicious propaganda in
the US.
In response,
Noam points out the importance of separating policies
emanating from Washington from public opinion in the US,
with the latter often at odds with the former. Given the
nature of electoral politics today in the US, he also
points out that officials in Washington are usually
elected by a minority of the population and represent
two parties that are virtually indistinguishable on
fundamental issues, and hence the importance of reaching
out to the US public ahead of policy makers who are
beholden to corporate interests.
Nasrallah
covers a wide range of issues in his presentation,
including the arms of Hizbullah, which the US and its
allies have demanded be relinquished. Nasrallah presents
the issue of the arms in the context of a strategy to
defend southern Lebanon which, he argues, concerns all
Lebanese and not only Hizbullah. After the meeting, to
the pack of journalists and TV crews waiting outside,
Noam declares: "I think Nasrallah has a reasoned and
persuasive argument that the arms should be in the hands
of Hizbullah as a deterrent to potential aggression, and
there are plenty of background reasons for that ..."
Enough to feed the right-wing rumor mill for a long time
to come.
May 12,
Masrah al Madina, Beirut.
After Noam's
lecture, there is an unexpected and particularly
poignant moment. A young woman, maybe in her late 20's,
comes up to Noam and just says "I am Kinda." She has one
of Noam's books, Pirates and Emperors, where he
reproduced the letter she wrote at the age of seven
after the American air raid that destroyed her home in
Tripoli, Libya, in April 1986. This was a terrorist
attack that killed between 60 and 100 civilians, aptly
characterized by American journalist Donald Neff at the
time as "a demonstration of the bully [the Reagan
administration] on the block picking a fight with the
little guy [the Qaddafi regime]." Kinda asks Noam to
sign the book; her mother is there too. Noam calls Carol
over and they all meet. Kinda's letter read:
Dear Mr
Reagan
Why did you
kill my only sister Rafa and my friend Racha, she is
only nine, and my baby doll Strawberry. Is it true you
want to kill us all because my father is Palestinian and
you want to kill Kadafi because he wants to help us go
back to my father's home and land.
My name is
Kinda
ABC
correspondent Charles Glass, who reported the Libya
bombing and aftermath from the scene in April 1986, dug
out Kinda's letter from the rubble of her home, whose
American-educated family he visited and remained in
touch with after they moved to Lebanon.[5]
Three days
later on May 15, Noam and Carol watch the BBC evening
news at their hotel, and see David Welch sanctimoniously
droning on about how the State Department has carefully
reviewed Libya's record and decided that they have
adhered to international norms, so that the US will
remove them from the list of states supporting
terrorism. There is no limit to dissembling, conscious
or not, for State Department officials, it seems.
May 13,
Khiam, South Lebanon.
To reach
Khiam we have to drive along a narrow road right along
the Israeli-Lebanese border, occasionally marked by a
barbed-wire fence. On a bright Spring day, we pass the
Israeli town of Metulla where we clearly see some of the
inhabitants tending to their daily chores, with houses
clustering the hill with the watch-tower and the Israeli
flag on top. This is the uppermost part of the Galilee
with deep mountain ravines, streams and (in May) lush
green fields. The view from Khiam across the valley,
towards the Shebaa Farms[6] and Mount Hermon at a
distance, is breath-taking.
Sheikh Nabil
Qauq, head of Hizbullah in southern Lebanon, is waiting
for us at the entrance to the former Israeli prison and
torture camp in Khiam, surrounded by a bevy of TV crews
and journalists. Qauq gives us an effusive reception as
soon as we alight from our cars, with Noam getting a
warm embrace with kisses on both cheeks. There are two
disabled and rusting military trucks with Hebrew
markings, parked in the middle of the prison yard, which
were left behind by the Israeli army after its
withdrawal in May 2000. The whole scene is captured by
photographers and TV cameramen, but not only. There is a
constant drone overhead -- it is an unmanned aircraft
barely visible in the bright hazy sky which, we are
told, the Israeli military regularly flies over the
border region to film suspected movements of Lebanese
and Palestinian militants.
The next day
we are served front-page photographs of Noam and Qauq,
inspecting an old Khiam prison cell, in all major Beirut
newspapers. And, sure enough, another two or three days
later hysterical bloggers proclaim "Noam Chomsky
applauds jihad," "Chomsky should not be allowed back
into the US," etc., the usual right-wing Chomsky-bashing
diatribes.
May 13,
Nabatiyeh, South Lebanon.
At the
Cultural Council for South Lebanon, Habib Sadek
introduces Noam most eloquently: "Today is an historic
occasion ..." We have to listen carefully to catch all
the words of Habib Sadek and subsequent speakers,
through a cacophony of constantly moving chairs and an
unruly sound system. The meeting announced as "an open
discussion with Noam Chomsky" turns into a rather rowdy
and enthusiastic reception, cut all too short after an
hour at the end of an exhausting day. Some one hundred
of Nabatiyeh's townspeople, old in suits and young in
jeans and colorful shirts, are crowding a small hall to
ask questions and hear the honored guest. Outside in the
garden there are at least as many people, some peering
through the open windows and doors, others standing back
and listening to the exchange inside the hall from the
loudspeakers. At the end Habib Sadek, a gaunt and
elegantly dressed man in his 70's, bemoans to me the
brevity of the event and the missed opportunity for a
longer discussion with Noam.
May 14,
Beirut.
It is not
possible to accommodate all invitations and requests for
meetings with Noam. Some are declined regretfully, such
as the request from Ayatollah Muhammad Hussein Fadlallah
in recognition of Noam's denunciation of a murderous
terrorist attack in March of 1985, now nearly forgotten
in the West. At the time, a car-bomb operation in a
populous section of West Beirut, organized by the CIA,
was intended to assassinate Fadlallah. The bomb killed
some 80 civilians and wounded over 200, though Fadlallah
escaped serious injury.[7]
Other
invitations are just ignored, such as one from a high
government official in Syria asking Noam to visit
Damascus. This is not the time to even acknowledge such
an invitation, on the very day the Syrian government has
arrested the writer and democracy activist Michel
Kilo.[8]
The preceding
notes are a partial account of an extraordinary visit at
a particularly tense time in the Middle East. For those
who welcomed Noam in Beirut, it was important to hear an
American voice of hope and reason, however briefly, in
contrast to the unending ominous pronouncements from
Washington officials that are in effect promises for
more violence and destruction -- in Lebanon, in the
Palestinian territories, in Iraq, and in the region in
general. For Noam, his short visit was important too, a
first-hand experience with people and places that have
been at the center of his concerns for many decades.
Notes
1.
Noam
Chomsky's response to columnist Geov Parrish of the
Seattle Weekly, January 18, 2006.
2.
The
lecture of May 9, entitled "The Great Soul of Power,"
was the First Edward Said Memorial Lecture at the AUB,
focusing on the culture of empire and the responsibility
of intellectuals. The lecture of May 10, entitled
"Biolinguistic Explorations: Design, Development,
Evolution," was a historical survey of central ideas of
that field where linguistics, evolutionary biology, and
the neuro-sciences all meet.
3.
Irene
Gendzier, professor of political science at Boston
University, wrote a study of US intervention in Lebanon
and the Middle East in the period 1945-1958, Notes
from the Minefield, Columbia University Press, 1997
(a new edition with a new preface, forthcoming from the
same press in Fall 2006).
4.
A
detailed and gripping account of the massacre and
surrounding events is provided by Bayan Nuwayhed
al-Hout, Sabra and Shatila, September 1982, Pluto
Press, 2004. Two of the more trustworthy sources listed
on pages 276-278 of Bayan al-Hout's book, a report by
the Lebanese Red Cross and an independent investigation
by the Israeli journalist Amnon Kapeliouk, mention that
between 3000 and 3500 were murdered during the two-day
rampage on September 16-18, 1982. The wider political
context is covered in Noam Chomsky, Fateful Triangle,
Updated Edition, South End Press, 1999 – see, in
particular, Chapters 5 and 6.
5.
Kinda's letter was reprinted in Noam Chomsky, Pirates
and Emperors, Claremont Research and Publications,
1986, p. 155. The letter and details of the whole
episode are in a new edition of the book, Noam Chomsky,
Pirates and Emperors, Old and New,
Internationalism Terrorism in the Real World, South
End Press, 2002, Chapter 3, pp. 81-103. Charles Glass
published Kinda's letter in the Spectator,
London, May 3, 1986. A facsimile of the original was
submitted to the press in the US as a letter to the
editor, but not published. The text was then published
by Alexander Cockburn in In These Times, July 23,
1986, with a suggestion that since President and Mrs.
Reagan "are fond of reading out messages from small
children, they might care to deliver this one on the
next appropriate occasion."
6.
The
Shebaa Farms are a mountainside of little more than 25
square kilometers, occupied by Israel since 1967. From
time to time, Lebanese shepherds or farmers have lost
their way into the Shebaa Farms, who have then been
abducted or killed by the Israeli army. It is one reason
advanced by Hizbullah and its supporters for not giving
up their weapons.
7.
Bob
Woodward and Charles R. Babcock, "CIA Tied to Beirut
Bombing," International Herald Tribune (13 May
1985).
8.
Kilo
is one of the signatories of a declaration, entitled
"Beirut-Damascus/Damascus-Beirut," which appeared in the
Beirut press on May 11, 2006. The declaration was signed
by nearly 300 Lebanese and Syrian intellectuals, and
called for a normalization of relations between Lebanon
and Syria, based on respect of the independence and
sovereignty of both countries. A few days after Kilo's
arrest, several other of the Syrian signatories were
also taken to prison.
This article
is extracted from the introduction of a forthcoming
booklet in Arabic that will include the texts,
translated to Arabic, of Chomsky's three lectures in
Beirut and one long interview with the TV talk-show host
Marcel Ghanem of the Lebanese Broadcasting Corporation.
Assaf Kfoury
is an Arab American. He grew up in Beirut and Cairo, and
is currently a professor of computer science at Boston
University.