loopholes
let Israeli airstrikes continue
Stephen Farrell, Times Middle East Correspondent, in Metula, says
that Condoleezza Rice's diplomatic success in arranging a 48 hour
halt to Israeli air strikes contains two loopholes so large that it
is having virtually no effect
By Stephen Farrell
07/31/06 "The
Times" -- -"There is a large discrepancy
between the
statement from the US State Department last night announcing
an immediate 48 hour halt to Israeli air strikes on southern
Lebanon, and the reality on the ground this morning.
"Certainly this is no ceasefire. Any Lebanese villager
stranded near the border with Israel would notice no difference
in the level of military activity compared to yesterday.
"From where I am standing in the village of Metula I can see
Israeli 155mm shells continuing to rain down on the Lebanese
border town of Kila at a rate of more than one a minute, causing
fires and covering the hillside opposite in a pall of drifting
smoke.
"I am told that they are firing smoke canisters rather than
live shells, as a ploy to provide cover for other military
operations - but for anyone unfortunate enough to be underneath
the bombardment it cannot be pleasant.
"Israeli heavy armour is active very close to and across the
Lebanese border. Despite the supposed ban on air strikes, an
Israeli F16 bomber jet was in action this morning, firing in
support of Israeli ground troops near the village of Taibeh.
"Hezbollah for its part is not observing a ceasefire either.
Early this morning its fighters fired an anti-tank missile
across the border and crippled an Israeli tank, right in front
of the world's media and they fired Katyusha rockets into the
town of Kiryat Shmona today.
"If you look carefully at the wording of the Condoleezza Rice
announcement, it emerges that the supposed cessation contains
loopholes. By saying that Israel 'reserved the right to take
action against targets preparing attacks against it', Israel is
allowed to continue to use its warplanes in support of ground
forces and it can also use them to attack Hezbollah rocket
launchers.
"This effectively allows Israeli air strikes to continue
unchecked in the border areas where its troops are active. Here,
the Israeli army has its full arsenal is still available. The
only parts of Lebanon which are likely to notice a halt in
airstrikes would be Beirut and areas further back from the
Israeli border.
"This chimes in with the mood in Israel this morning, where
there is a level of anger at the announcement of the temporary
halt to some air strikes. One mass circulation tabloid is openly
calling it a mistake, saying that the Israeli Prime Minister
should never have agreed to it. Instead, it says, the Israeli
army should intensify its offensive.
"Israeli public opinion remains robustly in favour of the war
in the face of the pictures coming out of Qana yesterday. Most
people, while expressing sorrow, agree with the Israeli
Government's line that Hezbollah was to blame and that the
civilians had been warned to leave.
"There is a mood of anger and frustration among armchair
generals that Israel was apparently strong-armed into a late
night about-face, after a day in which Ehud Olmert had been
defiant about Qana and saying that operations would continue.
"Amir Peretz, the Israeli Defence Minister, made it clear in
Parliament this morning that this is not a ceasefire, that
Israel is not interested in a ceasefire now, and indeed that its
security cabinet is meeting at 9pm (7pm BST) to discuss
expanding military operations in southern Lebanon.
"To understand what has happened, one needs to look at the
fact that the cessation in air strikes was announced, not by the
Israeli Prime Minister's Office, but by an official from Ms
Rice's State Department - a highly significant fact that has not
gone unnoticed in Israel among some commentators who are
extremely critical.
"They point out that Ms Rice has an unhappy record in Middle
East diplomacy. Her last achievement, to broker the safe passage
of aid into Gaza last November, was hailed as a US triumph but
fell apart within days if not hours.
"She had already been snubbed by the Lebanese yesterday, who
refused to let her visit Beirut again. Faced with the
embarrassing prospect of going home empty-handed, with nothing
to show for days of negotiations, she wanted to pull a rabbit
out of the hat - and this announcement was it.
"The Israelis have appeared to go along with it, but it has
actually made no difference on the ground this morning."
Copyright 2006 Times Newspapers Ltd.
Are Comments Offensive? Unsuitable? Email us