US troops 'war criminals' says prosecutor
From correspondents in Tikrit
08/04/06 "Herald
Sun" -- -- A MILITARY prosecutor branded four US
soldiers who have been accused of murdering Iraqi prisoners "war
criminals" on Friday and demanded they face a court martial.
The prosecutor, Captain Joseph Mackey, was speaking on the last day
of a legal hearing to determine whether there is enough evidence to
prosecute the troops following the May 9 slaying of three detainees.
"US soldiers must follow the laws of war. That's what makes us
better than the terrorists, what sets us apart from the thugs and
the hitmen. These soldiers did just the opposite," Mackey said, in
his closing argument.
The defendants, he charged, had cut the prisoners free of their
plastic handcuffs, "murdered them in cold blood," and later falsely
claimed the victims had escaped their bonds and assaulted their
captors.
"For this, they're not war heroes, they're war criminals, and
justice states that they face trial," he said. "Their story simply
doesn't make sense, and that's what we need to look at. It's
fabricated."
However, civilian defence lawyers acting for Private Corey Clagett,
Staff Sergeant Raymond Girouard, Specialist William Hunsaker and
Specialist Juston Graber, insisted that the prosecution had failed
to prove its case.
Clagett's counsel Paul Bergrin told the tribunal that military
prosecutors had failed to produce any eyewitness testimony or
forensic evidence to prove that the Iraqis had not been lawfully
killed.
Prosecution witnesses had given inconsistent statements, he and
other defence counsel alleged, and had all bar one said that they
did not believe that the defendants were men capable of premeditated
murder.
"They went in to a hot LZ (landing zone) with the pre-thoughts
they're going to fight terrorists, al-Qaeda insurgents. Every single
one of them followed their mission and their rules of engagement,"
Bergrin said.
The hearing ended and the panel of officers retired to decide
whether the defendants - air assault troops from the "Rakkasans",
the 3rd Brigade of the 101st Airborne Division -- ought to face
trial.
Their conclusion will be passed to the commander of the 101st, who
will announce his decision in the coming days.
If the case does come to trial, it will shine a critical spotlight
on US forces' controversial and opaque rules of engagement in Iraq.
This week's hearing heard that the Rakkasans' commander, Colonel
Michael Steele, had ordered the defendants' unit to "kill all
military age males" in their assault on a suspected insurgent base
on an island in the Tigris river.
Steele is a controversial figure following his leading role in a
bungled 1993 raid in the Somali capital Mogadishu - made famous by
the book and film "Black Hawk Down" - in which 18 US soldiers and
hundreds of Somalis died.
Several of the witnesses recalled during the hearing recalled
versions of the alleged order - one said it was "kill these sons of
bitches" - although some testified that this did not apply to
suspects who were clearly surrendering.
Steele, three more senior soldiers and all four defendants refused
to testify at the hearing to avoid incriminating themselves.
During Friday's hearing, Iraqi army soldiers who had accompanied the
US troops on the mission testified that many of them had been
distressed and decided to quit the army after seeing an unarmed old
man shot dead.
The man was shot as the unit approached a house in the target area
when he was seen at a window. The three detainees who were
subsequently killed were found inside the building.
Iraqi Sergeant Hamed Muhammed said the old man was around 75 and
unarmed.
"You know the situation," he told the hearing. "This incident makes
the people hate us. All the citizens hate us because we support the
United States, and cases like this incident make them hate us even
more."
International human rights watchdog groups have criticised US
tactics in Iraq, which are alleged to have caused needless civilian
casualties, but the military refuses to publicly discuss its rules
of engagement
© Herald and Weekly Times.
Are Comments Offensive? Unsuitable? Email us