Mexican Electoral Fraud Wins Round One
Round Two Now Begins -
By Stephen Lendman
08/16/06 "Information
Clearing House" -- -- It was no surprise on Sunday that the Mexican
Federal Electoral Institute (IFE) ruled its partial recount of about
9% of the ballots cast in the disputed presidential election held on
July 2 showed ruling National Action Party (PAN) candidate still the
winner. In doing so, the IFE ignored the clear evidence of election
irregularities and blatant fraud uncovered by losing Party of the
Democratic Revolution (PRD) candidate Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador.
The IFE ignored the need for a total ballot recount Obrador
justifiably demanded and instead relied on the small partial one it
chose in areas of known Calderon strength making it unlikely from
the start it would find enough of a change in the final tally to
change the election result. Lopez Obrador aides cited evidence of
overwhelming fraud in at least one-third of the polling stations and
that any failure to do a recount in all of them would show clear IFE
bias toward its announced winner on July 6 and would not be accepted
without a concerted fight. Let the battle begin.
The fraud uncovered so far showed the preliminary vote totals were
manipulated to allow PAN candidate Felipe Calderon to be the winner.
In addition, three million votes were never counted at first and
only in hindsight were 2.5 million of them added to the totals.
Further, 900,000 supposedly void, blank and annulled ballots were
declared null, discarded and never included in the official totals;
700,000 additional votes disappeared from missing precincts;
thousands of voters were denied their franchise in strong Obrador
precincts; there was evidence of ballot stuffing; and in about
one-third of the polling stations only winning party PAN observers
were present allowing ample opportunity for vote manipulation as has
happened routinely in a country known for its history of electoral
unfairness and where political dirty tricks and hardball tactics may
have been invented. It takes no stretch to know it was no different
this time, and Lopez Obrador now demands this injustice be addressed
and corrected.
Obrador promised he will not go gently "into that good night" and
will fight on to be declared the winner of the election it clearly
looks like he won but so far has been denied. He now plans to file
new charges of widespread fraud found during the recount process.
The discoveries include broken seals on some ballot boxes and
evidence showing the number of ballots in ballot boxes differed from
the number of blank ballots cast. Additional evidence will seek to
annul the results from thousands of polling stations Felipe Calderon
won by a margin great enough to indicate significant manipulation of
the count was likely. Lawyers for Mr. Obrador now claim these
irregularities alone warrant a full ballot recount, and Mexico City
Mayor-elect Marcelo Ebrard said: "There is now so much evidence of
fraud that the court will have to act."
Part of that evidence is the illegal campaigning ruling PAN
President Vincinte Fox did for Mr. Calderon and the fact that Felipe
Calderon exceeded his legally allowed campaign spending limits. He
did it to run vicious negative advertising through the
business-friendly Mexican corporate media calling Obrador an evil
twin of Venezuela's Hugo Chavez, falsely accusing him of accepting
campaign funds from the Venezuelan President, claiming Obrador was
guilty of corruption as mayor of Mexico City with no evidence to
prove it, and of being a "danger" for Mexico.
It was also learned early on that Felipe Calderon's brother-in-law
Diego Hildebrando Zavala wrote the vote-counting software, and it
was hacked during the electoral process. This discovery of a close
family member having control of the computer systems is evidence
enough of grossly improper activity that could easily have resulted
in vote count manipulation to give the electoral victory to the
candidate he obviously favored. Again, it takes no stretch to
imagine Mr. Zavala took full advantage of his ability to decide the
outcome.
It should be duly noted and stressed that in Latin America no
greater contrast can be drawn in how elections are run than to
compare the scrupulously honest and democratic process under Hugo
Chavez in Venezuela to the hopelessly corrupted one in Mexico. It
wasn't always that way in Venezuela, but once Hugo Chavez was
elected he established constitutionally by national referendum a
system of real participatory democracy where the Venezuelan people
actually have a say in how the government is run including being the
ones to decide in fair, open and honest elections who will be
elected including the President. In Mexico, it's long been just the
opposite. There the interests of wealth and power control the
process and see to it their chosen candidates run the country for
their benefit.
Round Two Now Begins As Lopez Obrador Intends To Fight On
Lopez Obrador made it clear after the July 6 announced results that
he intended to continue fighting for electoral justice and has asked
his supporters to rally in the streets around the country to demand
it. Already major demonstrations have been held in Mexico City's
huge Zocalo plaza. At a recent one as many as a record near-two
million turned out to show their support for their candidate. Lopez
Obrador now promises this will continue, and in a speech Sunday to
many thousands assembled in the Zocalo to hear him he said his
campaign for an honest recount will continue indefinitely in the
courts and in the streets. With the many millions of Mexicans fed up
with politics as usual, it now remains to be seen if their
mass-people power can overcome a Mexican tradition of entrenched
wealth and power always having it their way and the people be
damned. It will be an uphill battle, but don't count the people out
yet.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at
lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. Also visit his blog site at
sjlendman.blogspot.com.
Are Comments Offensive? Unsuitable? Email us