Is Iran Running Militias in Iraq?
Iraqi politicians say the growing U.S. claims of a clear link
between Shi'ite militias and Tehran is pure scapegoating. And
renewed Tehran-bashing in Washington could further complicate its
efforts to end the civil war
By APARISIM GHOSH/BAGHDAD
08/25/06 "Time" -- --
Iraq's most powerful politician has dismissed
claims by U.S. officials and generals that Iran is interfering in
Baghdad's affairs. Abdul-Azziz al-Hakim has told TIME that despite
repeated requests from him and other Iraqi politicians, American
officials have failed to show any reliable evidence of Tehran's
interference. " [The U.S.] has been making such claims for a long
time," he said, "and for three years we've told them, 'Show us
proof.' But they never have."
Hakim heads the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq,
or SCIRI, the largest of Iraq's political parties. SCIRI has close
ties to Tehran, and many of its leaders — including Hakim — spent
many years in exile in Iraq during the Saddam Hussein era.
Many Shi'ite politicians dismiss as scape-goating the statements by
Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad and generals at the Pentagon that Iran
is actively arming and training Sh'ite militias in Iraq. "They are
looking for somebody to blame for the failure [of the U.S. military
to halt the sectarian killings in Iraq] and it is easy to blame
Iran," said Hadi al-Amiri, who heads the Iraqi parliament's security
and defense committee, while also running the Badr Organization, a
Shi'ite militia.
Even political observers not affiliated to the Shi'ite parties are
likely to be surprised by Brig. Gen. Michael Barbero's claim, at a
press conference Wednesday, that there was "irrefutable" evidence of
Iranian collusion with Iraqi militias. That is the exact opposite of
what U.S. military officials in Baghdad have been saying. Less than
two weeks ago, the top U.S. military spokesman in Iraq, Maj. Gen.
William Caldwell, told journalists that there "is nothing that we
definitively have found to say that there are any Iranians operating
within the country of Iraq." He added that although "some Shi'ite
elements have been in Iran receiving training... the degree to which
this is known and endorsed by the government of Iran is uncertain."
There is an ironic echo in Barbero's claim that Iran was helping the
militias with technology to make improvised explosive devices, or
IEDs; last year, U.S. officials said Tehran was supplying IED
know-how to Iraq's Sunni insurgents. Several Sunni insurgent leaders
— whose hatred of Iran compares with their animosity toward the U.S.
— have told TIME they have no need of such outside help since their
ranks include many explosives experts from Saddam's military.
With the spiraling of sectarian violence in Iraq, each side has
taken to accusing the other of getting outside help. Sunni leaders
claim Shi'ite militias are trained by Iran, and Shi'ite leaders say
Sunni terrorists are funded by Saudi Arabia and Syria. Although U.S.
officials shy clear of fingering Riyadh, they have frequently
accused Damascus of aiding and abetting the Sunni insurgency.
Renewed Tehran-bashing in Washington is unlikely to sit well with
Iraqi Shi'ite politicians, who make up the dominant block of
parliament. Like Hakim and al-Amiri, many leading figures in the
Iraqi government are beholden to Iran for its support of the
anti-Saddam movement. The Dawa party of Prime Minister Nouri
al-Maliki (and former Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari) also owes
its survival during the Saddam years to Tehran. Antagonizing the
Shi'ite block could complicate U.S. efforts to end the civil war and
draw down American troops in Iraq.
Even Shi'ite leaders who didn't live in Iran have close ties to
their co-sectarians and have condemned U.S. efforts to pressure
Tehran into abandoning its nuclear program. The radical cleric
Moqtada al-Sadr has warned that if the U.S. launches a military
campaign against Iran, his militia, the Mahdi Army, will fight
shoulder-to-shoulder with the Iranians.
Leaders like Hakim say that rather than blame Iran or the Shi'ite
militias, the U.S. military — and Iraqi security forces — should be
focusing its energies on defeating the mainly Sunni insurgent and
terrorist groups. "The main cause of the violence in Iraq are the
Saddamists and [jihadi terrorists]," Hakim said. "We should not be
distracted from our main task, which is to destroy these forces. "
Copyright © 2006 Time Inc. All rights reserved.
Are Comments Offensive? Unsuitable? Email us