Poll Finds Waning Faith in Military Interventions
By Jim Lobe
09/08/06 "IPS" -- --
WASHINGTON - Five years after September 11,
2001, Americans are considerably less enthusiastic about
projecting military power abroad, according to a major new
survey, the first of a spate of polls that are likely to be
released in the run-up to Monday's fifth anniversary of the
attacks on New York and the Pentagon.
The survey, conducted by the Pew Research Center for the People
and the Press in Washington, found that Republicans remained
substantially more supportive of military deployments overseas
than either Democrats or independents, who also believe
- by 3-1 - that the United States has lost respect in the world
over the past few years.
The survey of more than 1,500 randomly selected adults also
found that nearly half (46%) of the respondents consider US
support for Israel a "major reason" for the rise in anti-US
sentiment around the world, a significant increase since Pew
last posed the question 10 months ago.
Significantly, that view was held by similar percentages of
self-described Republicans and Democrats who, on most other
foreign-policy questions, showed wide partisan differences.
The survey, however, was conducted from August 9-13, just before
the ceasefire that ended the month-long war between Israel and
Hezbollah, when international pressure on Washington to persuade
the Jewish state to stop its bombing campaign in Lebanon was at
its height.
Publication of the Pew survey coincided with the release of a
second poll on Wednesday by CNN that found widespread skepticism
over claims by the administration of President George W Bush
that the US is making progress in the war in Iraq and that the
war is related to the larger "global war on terrorism" launched
after September 11.
Only one in four respondents in that poll, which was conducted
from August 30 to September 2, thought that Washington and its
allies were winning the war, compared with 13% who said the
insurgents were winning and 62% who said the war was in essence
stalemated.
Despite repeated and increasingly frequent assertions by Bush
that the war in Iraq has become the "central front" in the "war
on terrorism", a majority of 53% said it was "an entirely
separate military action". A larger majority of 58% said they
opposed the war, compared with 39% who said they favored it - a
margin that has not changed substantially over recent months.
The most interesting finding of the latest Pew poll appeared to
be the growing public disillusionment with US military
intervention.
By 45% versus 32%, respondents said they believed that the most
effective way to reduce the threat of terrorist attacks on the
US was to "decrease" rather than "increase" Washington's
military presence abroad.
As noted in an accompanying analysis by the Pew Center, that
finding marks a "stark reversal" from the public's position on
the first anniversary of the September 11 attacks. At that time,
a plurality of 48% of the public said expanding US military
deployments overseas was the best way to protect against future
attacks, while 29% called for reducing such commitments.
Similarly, according to the new survey, 43% of respondents said
they believed that "military strikes" against nations that were
trying to develop nuclear weapons was a very important way to
reduce future terrorism - a reduction of 15 percentage points
compared with a Pew survey taken in October 2002 when Bush was
trying to win congressional approval for a resolution
authorizing him to take military action against Iraq.
The new survey also suggested a more general desire to reduce US
involvement in the Middle East compared with four years ago.
Asked to identify what would be a "very important" step in
reducing terrorism, attacking nuclear facilities was rated the
highest (58%) in a group of five options. It was followed by
increasing defense spending and decreasing dependence on Mideast
oil (53%) and "not get[ting] involved in other countries'
problems" (32%).
In the most recent poll, however, attacking nuclear facilities
ranked third, far behind decreasing dependence on Mideast oil
(67%) and increasing defense spending (52%), and just two points
ahead of the non-involvement option, which rose (41%).
The increase in what some would describe as "isolationist"
sentiment echoed a similar finding in another poll conducted by
Pew and the Council on Foreign Relations last November.
Forty-two percent of respondents said they believed Washington
should "mind its own business internationally and let other
countries get along the best they can on their own", compared
with only 30% who took that position in December 2002.
Democrats and independents account for much of these changes. In
the summer of 2002, for example, Democrats by an eight-point
margin favored an increased military presence overseas. They now
favor a diminished presence by nearly 3-1. Support for a
decreased military presence among independents has also dropped
sharply, by some 17 percentage points, to a 49% plurality.
On the question of why the US has lost support around the world,
more than two-thirds of respondents identified a "major reason"
as the Iraq war; 58% cited "America's wealth and power"; 49%
"the US-led war on terror"; and 46% "US support for Israel".
Democrats were significantly more likely than Republicans to
cite the Iraq war and the "war on terrorism", while Republicans
were more likely to cite "America's wealth and power".
The survey also found a gradual increase in the view that the
September 11 attacks signified the beginning of a major conflict
between the West and the Islamic world. In October 2001, for
example, only 28% of respondents agreed with that view; in
August 2002, 35% expressed agreement; and, in the most recent
poll, 40% took that position.
Conversely, the percentage of those who agreed with the
proposition that September 11 represented only a conflict with a
"small, radical group" has fallen from 63% to 49% over the same
five-year period.
Still, 47% of respondents said the September 11 attacks were
equal in seriousness to the 1941 Japanese attack on Pearl
Harbor, Hawaii, that launched the US into World War II, while
35% said they were "more serious". Younger respondents, however,
were significantly more likely to say they were "more serious"
than older respondents.
Copyright - Inter Press Service
Click on "comments" below to read or post comments
Comment Guidelines
Be succinct, constructive and relevant to the story. We encourage engaging, diverse and meaningful commentary. Do not include personal information such as names, addresses, phone numbers and emails. Comments falling outside our guidelines – those including personal attacks and profanity – are not permitted.
See our complete Comment Policy and use this link to notify us if you have concerns about a comment. We’ll promptly review and remove any inappropriate postings.