Senate: No prewar Saddam-al-Qaida ties
By JIM ABRAMS Associated Press Writer
09/08/06 "AP'
-- --
WASHINGTON — There's no evidence Saddam Hussein had ties with
al-Qaida, according to a Senate report on prewar intelligence
that Democrats say undercuts President Bush's justification for
invading Iraq.
Bush administration officials have insisted on a link between
the Iraqi regime and terror leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.
Intelligence agencies, however, concluded there was none.
Republicans countered that there was little new in the report
and Democrats were trying to score election-year points with it.
The declassified document released Friday by the intelligence
committee also explores the role that inaccurate information
supplied by the anti-Saddam exile group the Iraqi National
Congress had in the march to war.
It concludes that postwar findings do not support a 2002
intelligence community report that Iraq was reconstituting its
nuclear program, possessed biological weapons or ever developed
mobile facilities for producing biological warfare agents.
The 400-page report comes at a time when Bush is emphasizing the
need to prevail in Iraq to win the war on terrorism while
Democrats are seeking to make that policy an issue in the
midterm elections.
It discloses for the first time an October 2005 CIA assessment
that prior to the war Saddam's government "did not have a
relationship, harbor, or turn a blind eye toward Zarqawi and his
associates."
Bush and other administration officials have said that the
presence of Zarqawi in Iraq before the war was evidence of a
connection between Saddam's government and al-Qaida. Zarqawi was
killed by a U.S. airstrike in June this year.
White House press secretary Tony Snow said the report was
"nothing new."
"In 2002 and 2003, members of both parties got a good look at
the intelligence we had and they came to the very same
conclusions about what was going on," Snow said. That was "one
of the reasons you had overwhelming majorities in the United
States Senate and the House for taking action against Saddam
Hussein," he said.
Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., a member of the committee, said the
long-awaited report was "a devastating indictment of the
Bush-Cheney administration's unrelenting, misleading and
deceptive attempts" to link Saddam to al-Qaida.
The administration, said Sen. John D. Rockefeller, D-W.Va., top
Democrat on the committee, "exploited the deep sense of
insecurity among Americans in the immediate aftermath of the
Sept. 11 attacks, leading a large majority of Americans to
believe _ contrary to the intelligence assessments at the time _
that Iraq had a role in the 9/11 attacks."
The chairman of the committee, Sen. Pat Roberts, R-Kan., said it
has long been known that prewar assessments of Iraq "were a
tragic intelligence failure."
But he said the Democratic interpretations expressed in the
report "are little more than a vehicle to advance election-year
political charges." He said Democrats "continue to use the
committee to try and rewrite history, insisting that they were
deliberately duped into supporting the overthrow of Saddam
Hussein's regime."
The panel report is Phase II of an analysis of prewar
intelligence on Iraq. The first phase, issued in July 2004,
focused on the CIA's failings in its estimates of Iraq's weapons
program.
The second phase has been delayed as Republicans and Democrats
fought over what information should be declassified and how much
the committee should delve into the question of how policymakers
may have manipulated intelligence to make the case for war.
The committee is still considering three other issues as part of
its Phase II analysis, including statements of policymakers in
the run up to the war.
On the Net: Senate Intelligence Committee: http://intelligence.senate.gov/
© 2006 The Associated Press
Click on "comments" below to read or post comments
Comment Guidelines
Be succinct, constructive and relevant to the story. We encourage engaging, diverse and meaningful commentary. Do not include personal information such as names, addresses, phone numbers and emails. Comments falling outside our guidelines – those including personal attacks and profanity – are not permitted.
See our complete Comment Policy and use this link to notify us if you have concerns about a comment. We’ll promptly review and remove any inappropriate postings.