The American Military's Cult of Cruelty
The change to 'warrior' creed is encouraging soldiers to commit
atrocities
By Robert Fisk
09/16/06 "The
Independent" --
-- In
the week that George Bush took to fantasising that his
blood-soaked "war on terror" would lead the 21st century into a
"shining age of human liberty" I went through my mail bag to
find a frightening letter addressed to me by an American veteran
whose son is serving as a lieutenant colonel and medical doctor
with US forces in Baghdad. Put simply, my American friend
believes the change of military creed under the Bush
administration--from that of "soldier" to that of "warrior"--is
encouraging American troops to commit atrocities.
From Abu Ghraib to Guantanamo to
Bagram, to the battlefields of Iraq and to the "black" prisons
of the CIA, humiliation and beatings, rape, anal rape and murder
have now become so commonplace that each new outrage is creeping
into the inside pages of our newspapers. My reporting notebooks
are full of Afghan and Iraqi complaints of torture and beatings
from August 2002, and then from 2003 to the present point. How,
I keep asking myself, did this happen? Obviously, the trail
leads to the top. But where did this cult of cruelty begin?
So first, here's the official US
Army "Soldier's Creed", originally drawn up to prevent anymore
Vietnam atrocities:
"I am an American soldier.
I am a member of the United
States Army--a protector of the greatest nation on earth.
Because I am proud of the uniform I wear, I will always act
in ways creditable to the military service and the nation
that it is sworn to guard ...
No matter what situation I
am in, I will never do anything for pleasure, profit or
personal safety, which will disgrace my uniform, my unit or
my country.
I will use every means I
have, even beyond the line of duty, to restrain my Army
comrades from actions, disgraceful to themselves and the
uniform.
I am proud of my country and
it's flag.
I will try to make the
people of this nation proud of the service I represent for I
am an American soldier."
Now here's the new version of
what is called the "Warrior Ethos":
I am an American soldier.
I am a warrior and a member
of a team. I serve the people of the Unites States and live
the Army values.
I will always place the
mission first.
I will never accept defeat.
I will never quit.
I will never leave a fallen
comrade.
I am disciplined, physically
and mentally tough, trained and proficient in my warrior
tasks and drills. I always maintain my arms, my equipment
and myself.
I am an expert and I am a
professional. I stand ready to deploy, engage and destroy
the enemies of the United States of America in close combat.
I am a guardian of freedom and the American way of life.
I am an American soldier.
Like most Europeans--and an
awful lot of Americans--I was quite unaware of this ferocious
"code" for US armed forces, although it's not hard to see how it
fits in with Bush's rantings. I'm tempted to point this out in
detail, but my American veteran did so with such eloquence in
his letter to me that the response should come in his words:
"The Warrior Creed," he wrote, "allows no end to any conflict
accept total destruction of the 'enemy'. It allows no defeat ...
and does not allow one ever to stop fighting (lending itself to
the idea of the 'long war'). It says nothing about following
orders, it says nothing about obeying laws or showing restraint.
It says nothing about dishonourable actions ...".
Each day now, I come across new
examples of American military cruelty in Iraq and Afgha-nistan.
Here, for example, is Army Specialist Tony Lagouranis, part of
an American mobile interrogation team working with US marines,
interviewed by Amy Goodman on the American Democracy Now!
programme describing a 2004 operation in Babel, outside Baghdad:
"Every time Force Recon went on a raid, they would bring back
prisoners who were bruised, with broken bones, sometimes with
burns. They were pretty brutal to these guys. And I would ask
the prisoners what happened, how they received these wounds. And
they would tell me that it was after their capture, while they
were subdued, while they were handcuffed and they were being
questioned by the Force Recon Marines ... One guy was forced to
sit on an exhaust pipe of a Humvee ... he had a giant blister,
third-degree burns on the back of his leg."
Lagouranis, whose story is
powerfully recalled in Goodman's new book, Static, reported this
brutality to a Marine major and a colonel-lawyer from the US
Judge Advocate General's Office. "But they just wouldn't listen,
you know? They wanted numbers. They wanted numbers of terrorists
apprehended ... so they could brief that to the general."
The stories of barbarity grow by the week, sometimes by the day.
In Canada, an American military deserter appealed for refugee
status and a serving comrade gave evidence that when US forces
saw babies lying in the road in Fallujah--outrageously, it
appears, insurgents sometimes placed them there to force the
Americans to halt and face ambush--they were under orders to
drive over the children without stopping.
Which is what happens when you
always "place the mission first" whenyou are going to
"destroy"--rather than defeat--your enemies. As my American vet
put it: "the activities in American military prisons and the
hundreds of reported incidents against civilians in Iraq,
Afghanistan and elsewhere are not aberrations--they are part of
what the US military, according to the ethos, is intended to be.
Many other armies behave in a worse fashion than the US Army.
But those armies don't claim to be the "good guys" ... I think
we need... a military composed of soldiers, not warriors."
Winston Churchill understood
military honour. "In defeat, defiance," he advised Britons in
the Second World War. "In victory, magnanimity." Not any more.
According to George W Bush this week "the safety of America
depends on the outcome of the battle in the streets of Baghdad"
because we are only in the "early hours of this struggle between
tyranny and freedom".
I suppose, in the end, we are
supposed to lead the 21st century into a shining age of human
liberty in the dungeons of "black" prisons, under the fists of
US Marines, on the exhaust pipes of Humvees. We are warriors, we
are Samurai. We draw the sword. We will destroy. Which is
exactly what Osama bin Laden said.
© 2006 Independent News and Media Limited
Click on "comments" below to read or post comments
Comment Guidelines
Be succinct, constructive and relevant to the story. We encourage engaging, diverse and meaningful commentary. Do not include personal information such as names, addresses, phone numbers and emails. Comments falling outside our guidelines – those including personal attacks and profanity – are not permitted.
See our complete Comment Policy and use this link to notify us if you have concerns about a comment. We’ll promptly review and remove any inappropriate postings.