|
There is no week nor day nor hour when tyranny may not
enter upon this country - if the people lose their
confidence in themselves - and lose their roughness and
spirit of defiance. - Walt Whitman
10/04/06 "Information
Clearing House" ---
I. - It was
a dark hour indeed last Thursday when the United States
Senate voted to end the constitutional republic and
transform the country into a "Leader-State," giving the
president and his agents the power to capture, torture
and imprison forever anyone - American citizens included
- whom they arbitrarily decide is an "enemy combatant."
This also includes those who merely give "terrorism"
some kind of "support," defined so vaguely that many
experts say it could encompass legal advice, innocent
gifts to charities or even political opposition to US government policy within its
draconian strictures.
All of this is bad enough - a sickening and cowardly
surrender of liberty not seen in a major Western
democracy since the Enabling Act passed by the German
Reichstag in March 1933. But it is by no means the full
extent of our degradation. In reality, the darkness is
deeper, and more foul, than most people imagine. For in
addition to the dictatorial powers of seizure and
torment given by Congress on Thursday to George W. Bush
- powers he had already seized and exercised for five
years anyway, even without this fig leaf of sham
legality - there is a far more sinister imperial right
that Bush has claimed - and used - openly, without any
demur or debate from Congress at all: ordering the
"extrajudicial killing" of anyone on earth that he and
his deputies decide - arbitrarily, without charges,
court hearing, formal evidence, or appeal - is an "enemy
combatant."
That's right; from the earliest days of the Terror War -
September 17, 2001, to be exact - Bush has claimed the
peremptory power of life and death over the entire
world. If he says you're an enemy of
America, you are. If he wants to
imprison you and torture you, he can. And if he decides
you should die, he'll kill you. This is not hyperbole,
liberal paranoia, or "conspiracy theory": it's simply a
fact, reported by the mainstream media, attested by
senior administration figures, recorded in official
government documents - and boasted about by the
president himself, in front of Congress and a national
television audience.
And although the Republic-snuffing act just passed by
Congress does not directly address Bush's royal
prerogative of murder, it nonetheless strengthens it and
enshrines it in law. For the measure sets forth clearly
that the designation of an "enemy combatant" is left
solely to the executive branch; neither Congress nor the
courts have any say in the matter. When this new law is
coupled with the existing "Executive Orders" authorizing
"lethal force" against arbitrarily designated "enemy
combatants," it becomes, quite literally, a license to
kill - with the seal of Congressional approval.
(Continued after the
jump.)
How arbitrary is this process by which all our lives and
liberties are now governed? Dave Niewert at Orcinus has
unearthed a remarkable admission of its totally
capricious nature. In an December 2002 story in the
Washington Post, then-Solicitor General Ted Olson
described the anarchy at the heart of the process with
admirable frankness:
"[There is no] requirement that the executive branch
spell out its criteria for determining who qualifies as
an enemy combatant," Olson argues.
"'There won't be 10 rules that trigger this or 10 rules
that end this,' Olson said in the interview. 'There will
be judgments and instincts and evaluations and
implementations that have to be made by the executive
that are probably going to be different from day to day,
depending on the circumstances.'"
In other words, what is safe to do or say today might
imperil your freedom or your life tomorrow. You can
never know if you are on the right side of the law,
because the "law" is merely the whim of the Leader and
his minions: their "instincts" determine your guilt or
innocence, and these flutterings in the gut can change
from day to day. This radical uncertainty is the very
essence of despotism - and it is now, formally and
officially, the guiding principle of the United States government.
And underlying this edifice of tyranny is the
prerogative of presidential murder. Perhaps the enormity
of this monstrous perversion of law and morality has
kept it from being fully comprehended. It sounds
unbelievable to most people: a president ordering hits
like a Mafia don? But that is our reality, and has been
for five years. To overcome what seems to be a
widespread cognitive dissonance over this concept, we
need only examine the record - a record, by the way,
taken entirely from publicly available sources in the
mass media. There's nothing secret or contentious about
it, nothing that any ordinary citizen could not know -
if they choose to know it.
II.
Six days after the 9/11 attacks, George W. Bush signed a
"presidential finding" authorizing the CIA to kill those
individuals whom he had marked for death as terrorists.
This in itself was not an entirely radical innovation;
Bill Clinton's White House legal team had drawn up memos
asserting the president's right to issue "an order to
kill an individual enemy of the United States in
self-defense," despite the legal prohibitions against
assassination, the Washington Post reported in October
2001. The Clinton team based this
ruling on the "inherent powers" of the "Commander in
Chief" - that mythical, ever-elastic construct that Bush
has evoked over and over to defend his own
unconstitutional usurpations.
The practice of "targeted killing" was apparently never
used by Clinton, however; despite the pro-assassination
memos, Clinton followed the traditional presidential
practice of bombing the hell out of a bunch of civilians
whenever he wanted to lash out at some recalcitrant
leader or international outlaw - as in his bombing of
the Sudanese pharmaceutical factory in 1998, or the two
massive strikes he launched against Iraq in 1993 and
1998, or indeed the death and ruin that was deliberately
inflicted on civilian infrastructure in Serbia during
that nation's collective punishment for the crimes of
Slobodan Milosevic. Here, Clinton
was following the example set by George H.W. Bush, who
killed hundreds, perhaps thousands, of Panamanian
civilians in his illegal arrest of Manuel Noriega in
1988, and Ronald Reagan, who killed Moamar Gadafy's
adopted 2-year-old daughter and 100 other civilians in a
punitive strike on Libya
in 1986.
Junior Bush, of course, was about to outdo all those
blunderbuss strokes with his massive air attacks on
Afghanistan, which killed thousands of civilians, and
the later orgy of death and destruction in Iraq. But he
also wanted the power to kill individuals at will. At
first, the assassination program was restricted to
direct orders from the president aimed at specific
targets, as suggested by the Clinton memos. But soon the arbitrary power of
life and death was delegated to agents in the field,
after Bush signed orders allowing CIA assassins to kill
targets without seeking presidential approval for each
attack, the Washington Post reported in December 2002.
Nor was it necessary any longer for the president to
approve each new name added to the target list; the
"security organs" could designate "enemy combatants" and
kill them as they saw fit. However, Bush was always keen
to get the details about the agency's wetwork,
administration officials assured the Post.
The first officially confirmed use of this power was the
killing of an American citizen, along with several
foreign nationals, by a CIA drone missile in Yemen on November 3, 2002. A similar
strike occurred on December 4, 2005, when a CIA missile
destroyed a house and purportedly killed Abu Hamza
Rabia, a suspected al-Qaeda figure. But the only bodies
found at the site were those of two children, the
houseowner's son and nephew, Reuters reports. The
grieving father denied any connection to terrorism. An
earlier CIA strike on another house missed Rabia but
killed his wife and children, Pakistani officials
reported.
However, there is simply no way of knowing at this point
how many people have been killed by American agents
operating outside all judicial process. Most of the
assassinations are carried out in secret: quietly,
professionally. As a Pentagon document uncovered by the
New Yorker in December 2002 revealed, the death squads
must be "small and agile," and "able to operate
clandestinely, using a full range of official and
non-official cover arrangements to ... enter countries
surreptitiously."
What's more, there are strong indications that the Bush
administration has outsourced some of the contracts to
outside operators. In the original Post story about the
assassinations - in those first heady weeks after 9/11,
when administration officials were much more open about
"going to the dark side," as Cheney boasted on national
television - Bush insiders told the paper that "it is
also possible that the instrument of targeted killings
will be foreign agents, the CIA's term for nonemployees
who act on its behalf.
Here we find a deadly echo of the "rendition" program
that has sent so many captives to torture pits in Syria, Egypt and elsewhere - including many whose
innocence has been officially established, such as the
Canadian businessman Maher Arar, German national Khalid
El-Masri, UK native Mozzam
Begg and many others. They had been subjected to
imprisonment and torture despite their innocence,
because of intelligence "mistakes." How many have fallen
victim to Bush's hit squads on similar shaky grounds?
So here we are. Congress has just entrenched the
principle of Bush's "unitary executive" dictatorship
into law; and it is this principle that undergirds the
assassination program. As I wrote in December, it's hard
to believe that any genuine democracy would accept a
claim by its leader that he could have anyone killed
simply by labeling them an "enemy." It's hard to believe
that any adult with even the slightest knowledge of
history or human nature could countenance such
unlimited, arbitrary power, knowing the evil it is bound
to produce. Yet this is exactly what the great and good
in
America have done.
But this should come as no surprise. They have known
about it all along, and have not only countenanced
Bush's death squad, but even celebrated it. I'll end
with one more passage from that December article, which
sadly is even more apt for our degraded reality today.
It was a depiction of the one of the most revolting
scenes in recent American history: Bush's state of the
Union address in January 2003, delivered live to the
nation during the final warmongering frenzy before the
rape of Iraq:
Trumpeting his successes in the Terror War, Bush claimed
that "more than 3,000 suspected terrorists" had been
arrested worldwide - "and many others have met a
different fate." His face then took on the
characteristic leer, the strange, sickly half-smile it
acquires whenever he speaks of killing people: "Let's
put it this way. They are no longer a problem."
In other words, the suspects - and even Bush
acknowledged they were only suspects - had been
murdered. Lynched. Killed by agents operating
unsupervised in that shadow world where intelligence,
terrorism, politics, finance and organized crime meld
together in one amorphous, impenetrable mass. Killed on
the word of a dubious informer, perhaps: a tortured
captive willing to say anything to end his torment, a
business rival, a personal foe, a bureaucrat looking to
impress his superiors, a paid snitch in need of cash, a
zealous crank pursuing ethnic, tribal or religious
hatreds - or any other purveyor of the garbage data that
is coin of the realm in the shadow world.
Bush proudly held up this hideous system as an example
of what he called "the meaning of American justice." And
the assembled legislators ... applauded. Oh, how they
applauded! They roared with glee at the leering little
man's bloodthirsty, B-movie machismo. They shared his
sneering contempt for law - our only shield, however
imperfect, against the blind, brute, ignorant, ape-like
force of raw power. Not a single voice among them was
raised in protest against this tyrannical machtpolitik:
not that night, not the next day, not ever.
And now, in September 2006, we know they will never
raise that protest. Oh, a few Democrats stood up at the
last minute on Thursday to posture nobly about the
dangers of the detainee bill - but only when they knew
the it was certain to pass, when they had already given
up their one weapon against it, the filibuster, in
exchange for permission from their Republican masters to
offer amendments that they also knew would fail. Had
they been offering such speeches since October 2001,
when the lineaments of Bush's presidential tyranny were
already clear - or at any other point during the
systematic dismantling of America's liberties over the past
five years - these fine words might have had some
effect.
Now the killing will go on. The tyranny that has entered
upon the country will grow stronger, more brazen; the
darkness will deepen. Whitman, thou should'st be living
at this hour; America has need
of thee. |
Comment Guidelines
Be succinct, constructive and relevant to the story. We encourage engaging, diverse and meaningful commentary. Do not include personal information such as names, addresses, phone numbers and emails. Comments falling outside our guidelines – those including personal attacks and profanity – are not permitted.
See our complete Comment Policy and use this link to notify us if you have concerns about a comment. We’ll promptly review and remove any inappropriate postings.