Guantanamo guards 'admitted abusing inmates'
By Rupert Cornwell
10/14/06 "The
Independent" -- Washington -- As the US rejected
fresh British government criticism of Guantanamo Bay, an
American soldier has made new charges that military guards
brutally treated inmates at the controversial top security
prison for terrorist suspects in south-eastern Cuba.
In a sworn affidavit, Heather Cerveny, a 23-year-old Marine
Corps sergeant, says she met several prison guards at a club on
the base where they told her over drinks of harsh abuse of
detainees, she said the guards claimed the abuse was both
commonplace and justified. The allegations are now being
investigated by US Southern Command, under whose jurisdiction
Guantanamo Bay falls.
In an interview with ABC News, Sgt Cerveny recounted how one
soldier specifically told her: "I took the detainee by the head
and smashed his head into the cell door." She alleged that the
guard also said: "That guy was annoying me. You know, I smacked
him in the head." She said she then asked one of the guards who
boasted of the beatings what consequences he had suffered for
his part in abusing prisoners. "And he [the guard] said
'nothing'." And, Sgt Cerveny added, "this wasn't bragging like
boy talk at the bar. I took it like this is something they do."
The affidavit was filed last week with the Pentagon's inspector
general, in accordance with the military's policy of encouraging
servicemen and women to report such instances of abuse, after
the storm of domestic and international criticism of the
treatment of prisoners at Guantanamo and the Abu Ghraib jail
near Baghdad. The inspector general referred the affidavit to
Southern Command.
The allegations are the latest in a long series of such accounts
of detainee abuse, and far from the most shocking or graphic.
But they are particularly embarrassing because they contradict
recent White House and Pentagon assurances that the problem had
been dealt with
Only last month, as he lobbied Congress to pass legislation
setting out new rules for the detention and trial of terrorist
suspects, President Bush declared that US troops "can take great
pride" in the work they did at Guantanamo Bay, whose 450-plus
inmates now include the 14 top suspects transferred there in
September after years of detention incommunicado in secret CIA
prisons overseas.
It was confirmed this week that this group - which includes
Khalid Sheik Mohammed, the alleged mastermind of the 9/11
attacks, and Abu Zubaydah, another high ranking al-Qa'ida
operative - received a visit from the Red Cross, their first
encounter with non-US officials since their capture. Others
however have been held at Guantanamo itself for more than four
years, ever since the prison opened in early 2002. Only 10 have
been charged with any crime.
Despite assurances from Mr Bush himself that he would rather
Guantanamo was shut down, there is no prospect of that happening
any time soon. Brushing off the latest such demand - from the
British Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett, US officials
reiterated yesterday that those detained were serious terrorist
threats, and that the prison would stay open as long as
neccessary.
"Look, we don't want Guantanamo open forever," said Sean
McCormack, the State Deaprtment spokesman. "We don't want to be
the world's jailers. We certainly would look forward to the day
when Guantanamo is closed."
Mrs Beckett is the highest ranking British official to publicly
criticise the US for its detention of suspects without trial at
the camp. Guantanamo Bay did as much to radicalise extremists as
it did to promote security, she said. "The continuing detention
without fair trial of prisoners is unacceptable in terms of
human rights, but it is also ineffective in terms of
counter-terrorism."
© 2006 Independent News and Media Limited
Click on "comments" below to read or post comments
Comment Guidelines
Be succinct, constructive and relevant to the story. We encourage engaging, diverse and meaningful commentary. Do not include personal information such as names, addresses, phone numbers and emails. Comments falling outside our guidelines – those including personal attacks and profanity – are not permitted.
See our complete Comment Policy and use this link to notify us if you have concerns about a comment. We’ll promptly review and remove any inappropriate postings.