11/09/06 "Information
Clearing House" -- -- NEW
YORK--"My fellow Americans," assured
incoming president Gerald Ford hours
after the Watergate scandals forced
Richard Nixon to resign, "our long
national nightmare is over."
I'm
tempted, in the aftermath of the
widest and most stunning electoral
repudiation of Republicanism since
Watergate, to mark the Democratic
recapture of governorships, the
House of Representatives (and
probably the Senate) as the
beginning of the end of Bush's
fascism lite, and thus a long
overdue vindication of what I've
been saying about him since his
December 2000 coup d'état.
Back in
2001 and 2002, state-controlled
media called me radical. Now, with
most Americans seeing things my way,
I'm mainstream. Yet I'm more scared
now.
"Iraq,"
I wrote a week before the 2003
invasion, "will probably be Bush's
Waterloo." And so it has been: Exit
polls found voters more motivated by
opposition to the war than any other
issue. "There was general revulsion
in the country, particularly among
Democrats and independents, against
the conduct of the war in Iraq,"
said pollster John Zogby. "This was,
at the grass roots, a referendum
against the war and the president.
For Republicans, there was
significant disappointment about
opportunities lost through enormous
budget deficits, threats to civil
liberties, a failed social agenda,
and the war." Although Democrats
failed to nationalize the election,
Iraq succeeded: a pitiful seven
percent of respondents to the latest
Gallup survey still want to "stay
the course."
A White
House controlled by an unpopular,
highly partisan lame duck, a rival
party majority without enough votes
in Congress to override his veto,
and the early start of a highly
anticipated 2008 presidential
campaign add up to one likely
result: gridlock. Bush's legislative
and military agendas are dead. But
our long national nightmare has just
begun.
A
Frightening New Security State
We'll be
cleaning up Bush's mess long after
his scheduled abdication on January
20, 2009. But the trillions of
dollars in national debt he has run
up and his two losing wars will
drain our economy for decades to
come. We've provoked a new
generation of terrorists. Yet even
more damaging and nearly impossible
to unravel will be the threats to
Americans posed by the neofascist
national security apparatus the
Bushists will leave behind--unless
they use it to remain in power.
Shortly
after 9/11 Bush began the first of a
long series of power grabs that have
transformed him from the leader of a
country beholden to its people to an
authoritarian despot. He signed a
secret executive order granting
himself the right to declare anyone
in the world, including a U.S.
citizen, an "enemy
combatant"--without proof--and order
him assassinated. Violating federal
law and privacy rights, Bush
authorized the NSA to listen to our
phone calls and read our e-mail.
FBI, CIA and HomeSec goons
"disappeared" thousands of people
into a horrible new matrix of
concentration camps and secret
prisons.
On
October 17, 2006 Bush signed the
Military Commissions Act. The new
law, scarcely mentioned in the
media, is breathtaking for the
breadth of its attack on basic
rights. Under the MCA either the
president or the secretary of
defense may declare you an "enemy
combatant"--as usual, without proof.
Under that designation you may be
jailed, without the right to an
attorney, for the rest of your life.
You can even be tortured. Your U.S.
citizenship can't protect you. And
it's all "legal."
Concentration Camps
In
January 2006 HomeSec awarded a $385
million contract to Kellogg, Brown
and Root, the subsidiary of
Halliburton Co., to build "temporary
detention and processing
capabilities"--internment camps--"in
the event of an emergency influx of
immigrants into the U.S., or to
support the rapid development of new
programs."
The
question, asks Progressive magazine
editor Ruth Conniff, "is what is the
government planning to do with mass
roundups of people?" After all, Bush
and other Republican leaders have
spent five years calling Democrats
and others who disagree with them
traitors and terrorists. Following
so much hateful rhetoric, you can't
blame liberals for wondering whether
they too are about to be declared
"enemy combatants." They're not
paranoid; they're just paying
attention.
And Now,
Martial Law
About a
week ago some left-wing bloggers
began circulating rumors that Bush
had secretly signed something called
the "John Warner Defense
Authorization Act of 2007" that
"allows the president to declare a
'public emergency' and station
troops anywhere in America and take
control of state-based National
Guard units without the consent of
the governor or local authorities,
in order to 'suppress public
disorder.'" I couldn't find the text
of the law at the time, formerly
H.R. 5122, or a reliable media
account, so I decided not to report
on it.
I can
now confirm the bloggers' account.
Bush signed the JWDAA hours after
the MCA, in a furtive closed-door
White House ceremony. There is,
buried deep down in Title V,
Subtitle B, Part II, Section 525(a)
of the JWDAA, a coup. The Bush
Administration has quietly stolen
the National Guard away from the
states.
Here's
the relevant section of Public Law
109-364:
"The
[military] Secretary [of the Army,
Navy or Air Force] concerned may
order a member of a reserve
component under the Secretary's
jurisdiction to active duty...The
training or duty ordered to be
performed...may include...support of
operations or missions undertaken by
the member's unit at the request of
the President or Secretary of
Defense."
The
National Guard, used to maintain
order during natural disasters and
civil disturbances and the sole
vehicle available under U.S. law to
enforce a declaration of martial
law, has previously been controlled
by state governors. They have now
been stripped of that control.
Thanks to the JWDAA, Bush or
Rumsfeld can now deploy National
Guardsmen in American cities without
obtaining permission from state
governors.
Section
526 of the Warner Act goes further
still. It states that the "Governor
of a State...with the consent of the
[military] Secretary concerned, may
order a member of the National Guard
to perform Active Guard and Reserve
duty..." The key word is "may." A
governor can no longer deploy the
Guard in his or her state without
first getting Rumsfeld's permission.
Patrick
Leahy (D-VT) sounded the alarm
during senatorial debate, but U.S.
state-controlled media ignored him.
The Warner Act, he said, "includes
language that subverts solid,
longstanding posse comitatus
statutes that limit the military's
involvement in law enforcement,
thereby making it easier for the
President to declare martial
law...We fail our Constitution,
neglecting the rights of the states,
when we make it easier for the
president to declare martial law and
trample on local and state
sovereignty."
Only one
governor, Kathleen Blanco of
Louisiana, made a fuss over the
Warner Act. A spokesman for the
National Governors Association
requested a wimpy "clarification"
concerning what circumstances might
prompt Bush to impose martial law.
As far as I can determine this
column marks the first time the
JWDAA has been mentioned in the
mainstream media.
Now the
dark men who engineered America's
post-9/11 police state have watched
the public reject their policies.
The incoming Democratic majority
Congress will be able to hold
hearings and launch investigations
that could lead to their indictments
and removal from office. John
Dingell, the liberal incoming
chairman of the Commerce Committee
did nothing to dissuade GOP fears of
"a blizzard of subpoenas": "As the
Lord High Executioner said in 'The
Mikado,'" Dingell recently joked, "I
have a little list."
A year
of crisis commences.
As ugly
secrets surface, Bushists will turn
desperate. Democracy has failed
their grand schemes; token
resignations like Rumsfeld's come
too little, too late. Only tyranny
can save their skins. Will the
beleaguered neocons led by Cheney
and Bush, cornered like rats,
unleash their brand-new police state
on their political opponents? Or
will they tough it out and suck up
the fines and prison sentences to
come? The next year or two could go
either way.
The
nightmare is not over.
Comment Guidelines
Be succinct, constructive and relevant to the story. We encourage engaging, diverse and meaningful commentary. Do not include personal information such as names, addresses, phone numbers and emails. Comments falling outside our guidelines – those including personal attacks and profanity – are not permitted.
See our complete Comment Policy and use this link to notify us if you have concerns about a comment. We’ll promptly review and remove any inappropriate postings.