Bury my heart in the Green
Zone
By Pepe Escobar
| "We are in dire need of Iran's help in establishing
security and stability in Iraq."- Iraqi President Jalal
Talabani, November 27, in Tehran |
11/28/06 "Asia
Times" -- --- As dozens of people a day
(sometimes a couple of hundred a day), every single day,
Sunni and Shi'ite alike, continue to be beheaded,
tortured, blown up, shot, kidnapped, struck by mortars
and even doused in gasoline and set on fire in a
non-stop gruesome ritual, every big player seems to be
laying down a desperate game to "save" Iraq. This
includes the ongoing summit between Iraqi President
Jalal Talabani and his Iranian counterpart Mahmud
Ahmadinejad in Iran and this week's meeting between
President George W Bush and Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri
al-Maliki in Jordan.
But they all have forgotten to consider the guerrilla
point of view; as far as the Sunni Arab resistance is
concerned, any summit is guilty of legitimizing the
"puppet" Iraqi government.
The Talabani-Ahmadinejad meeting was supposed to have
included Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. Syria had to
walk a careful diplomatic tightrope to evade Iran's
invitation without alienating a close ally and at the
same time send a signal to Washington it is willing to
talk with no preconditions. James Baker's and Lee
Hamilton's Iraq Study Group (ISG), after all, will
propose a chaos-defying summit between Iraq and all its
close neighbors.
Non-stop White House and Pentagon accusations swirl
around: Syria facilitates the flow of jihadis into Iraq
through their deserted, 1,200-kilometer border. This
simply does not make sense (in fact the exodus is the
other way around: every day up to 2,000 Iraqis flee to
Syria, and more than 1,000 to Jordan, according to the
United Nations). Syria may have a Ba'athist regime, but
the power elite is configured by Alawites - who follow a
branch of Shi'ism completely different from Iran's
duodecimals (who believe in 12 imams). The utmost fear
of the Assad regime is exactly Salafi-jihadis of the
al-Qaeda kind, so Damascus would not be aiding them.
Kurdish warlord-turned-politician Talabani may have been
US-protected during the days of Saddam Hussein, but
quite a few players in the White House and Pentagon axis
will have their reasons to regard the summit in Tehran
as a pure "axis of evil". As for the helpless Maliki,
there's not much for Bush to lecture him about; his days
in power may be numbered. According to various and
persistent reports, including from Western and Arab
networks, a coup d'etat may be in the works in Baghdad:
the US in the Green Zone may have enlisted four of
Saddam's Sunni Arab generals with the mission of
toppling the Shi'ite-majority Maliki government to
install a regime of "national salvation". It would then
restructure the Shi'ite-dominated ministries of Defense
and Interior and finish off Shi'ite militias such as the
Badr Organization of the Supreme Council for the Islamic
Revolution in Iraq (SCIRI) and the Mehdi Army of Muqtada
al-Sadr.
Call it the return of the Ba'athists - minus Saddam.
Even before rumors of a coup began circulation, one
could see the so-called diplomatic strategists of
Baker's ISG coming up with the idea of trying to co-opt
the resistance into entering a coalition government.
But that does not mean the plan will work. The US might
invest in an Asian-style face-saving operation spun by
heavy public relations by getting involved in direct
negotiations with the Sunni Arab resistance. But only a
Saddam-style dictator is capable of assuring a strong,
stable central government in Baghdad in charge of
security for everyone, with no discrimination. That
would mean alienating the Shi'ite religious parties and
their paramilitary factions to the limit.
The return of the Ba'athists fits into a "stay the
course" pattern. And it also somehow fits into the
Pentagon's "go big" (more troops) and "go long" (many
years) strategies - which would take at least up to 2015
before Iraqization of the security forces is complete.
In the end, these "strategies" amount to little more
than a catchphrase - a muddled "go big but short while
transitioning to go long".
A web of myth continues to be spun by much of the
world's press, according to which Iran, as an
overpowering entity, uses the US occupation to crush the
Sunni Arab resistance while manipulating Shi'ite
militias. This is a two-pronged fallacy. The Pentagon's
finest in Iraq are not crushing anything - on the
contrary. Al-Qaeda in Iraq has all but installed an
Islamic emirate in al-Anbar province, while the Mehdi
Army reigns in Kufa, south of Baghdad, and in Sadr City
in Baghdad itself.
The 10,000-strong Badr Organization - affiliated with
SCIRI - may have been trained by the Revolutionary
Guards in Iran, but it does not take any orders from
Tehran. As for Muqtada's 7,000-strong Mehdi Army, it is
split into at least three different factions (two of
them don't even respond to Muqtada anymore). But all of
them are opposed to Iranian interference.
The Maliki government is, for all purposes, already
dead. Maliki, the No 2 of the Islamist Da'wa Party,
controls only 25 representatives in the 275-member
parliament. He depends on the SCIRI - which has the
majority - and the Sadrists. So obviously Maliki cannot
order any kind of crackdown either on the Badr or the
Mehdi Army factions. According to the Islamic Party -
which has the majority of parliamentarians under the
Sunni Concord Front - the police and the army are
totally infiltrated by Shi'ite militias. The Sadrists
for their part denounce the US "return of the
Ba'athists" strategy - and defend the Mehdi Army as
patriots who protect Shi'ites from the takfiris (Sunni
radicals).
The Maliki government won't go down quietly, though, if
judged by its current diplomatic frenzy. The US for its
part will accomplish absolutely nothing by trying to
take down Muqtada and the Mehdi Army, or even the Badr
Organization. If the Pentagon somehow decided to go on
an all-out offensive, it would be very easy for
SCIRI/Badr - or for Mehdi Army commandos - completely to
cut off the US supply route from Kuwait to Baghdad.
What the Shi'ite Islamic parties in power and Tehran
agree on is a crucial point: the Sunni Arab resistance
must be vanquished. But Muqtada's position is more
nuanced: as a true Iraqi nationalist, he does not rule
out agreements with Sunni Arabs with the supreme
objective of kicking the occupiers out. Meanwhile, the
US military will keep being caught in a deadly trap -
between the sprawling, underground Sunni Arab resistance
and the Shi'ite militias' non-stop rampage.
The fall of the Green Zone
Everyone is guilty in the ongoing Iraq tragedy. The
US-trained new Iraqi army is infiltrated by militias, by
death squads and even by al-Qaeda in Iraq. The SCIRI,
Da'wa and the Kurds are only worried about their own
interests, not the interests of Iraq as a nation. And
the US - always hiding under the dubious mantra of
"Iraqi democracy" - totally evades its responsibility in
provoking the appalling chaos in the first place.
Militia hell will remain impervious to any summit.
Shi'ite clerical leader Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani
may call for restraint. But Sistani does not control the
Shi'ite proletarian masses anymore, Muqtada does. The
Americans - attacked at least 180 times a day, every day
- will keep "controlling" only one piece of real estate
in the whole of Mesopotamia (although an extremely
valuable one): the Green Zone.
The ISG may recommend more summits and more covert
contacts with the Sunni Arab resistance. Ahmadinejad,
Talabani and Assad may even meet again. But Baghdad
sources close to the resistance in the Sunni belt have
told Asia Times Online of another coup in the making -
and that goes way beyond the removal of the Maliki
government.
Secular former Ba'athists and Saddam's fighters
congregated in the Army of Mohammed - the paramilitary
wing of the Awda Party - are already in control of the
Syrian border (and not Salafi-jihadis of the al-Qaeda
kind).
The next big step for the Sunni Arab resistance -
according to sheikhs of the powerful Shammar Sunni tribe
- would be to take out the Badr Organization, holed up
in the Ministry of the Interior, and the two most
murderous factions of the Mehdi Army. That would mean an
Iraqi nationalist purge of the hated "Iranians". And
that implies an all-out attack on the Green Zone.
The return of the Ba'athists and the fall of the Green
Zone: now that's a prime-time double bill to knock 'em
dead.
Copyright 2006 Asia Times Online Ltd.
Comment Guidelines
Be succinct, constructive and relevant to the story. We encourage engaging, diverse and meaningful commentary. Do not include personal information such as names, addresses, phone numbers and emails. Comments falling outside our guidelines – those including personal attacks and profanity – are not permitted.
See our complete Comment Policy and use this link to notify us if you have concerns about a comment. We’ll promptly review and remove any inappropriate postings.