There has to be equality
If Britons can join the Israeli army, those who fight
for Palestine can't be treated as terrorists
By
Ismail Patel
12/05/06 "The
Guardian" -- -The Arab-Israeli conflict is
unlike any other regional conflict. As the UN secretary
general, Kofi Annan, put it: "No other conflict carries
such a powerful symbolic and emotional charge among
people far removed from the battlefield." Not
surprisingly, this has had its impact on multicultural
Britain, with different communities aligning themselves
to varying degrees with the Israeli and Palestinian
causes.
Everyone in a democracy has the right to argue for their
views and engage in public debate. But there is no
equality when it comes to how the British government
treats those who want to give physical support to Israel
and those who want to do the same for the Palestinians.
Such double standards feed resentment in Britain's
Muslim community at the government's failure to
recognise its legitimate grievances, as highlighted in
yesterday's report by the thinktank Demos.
In recent months the media have reported on the
recruitment of British Jews to fight in the Israeli
army, now in its 40th year of occupation of Palestinian
territory in defiance of international law and UN
resolutions. Some are intending to emigrate; others to
return to Britain after serving in the Israeli army. But
we have not had a word of concern from the British
government. In the Muslim community, however, the
question is widely raised as to how British citizens can
travel to another country and fight in its army of
illegal occupation without any repercussions. Would that
be the case if, say, a young Muslim or Briton of
Palestinian origin travelled to the occupied Palestinian
territories - let alone occupied Iraq - to protect his
or her homeland or co-religionists? Of course not: such
volunteers could expect to be arrested under this
government's anti-terrorism legislation as soon as they
returned.
These Britons who go to fight for Israel are
volunteering to serve in the frontline of Israel's war
in the illegally occupied territories of the West Bank
and Gaza. Some have acknowledged that they have been or
will be engaged in the killing of Palestinians. Under
international law they and those who facilitate their
enlistment are committing war crimes.
Presumably the politicians' silence can be explained by
Britain's support for the Israeli government, both
diplomatic and military. But how does that sit with the
government's regular homilies to the Muslim community
about citizenship and loyalty to the flag? It might be
argued that as Israel is a state - unlike the
Palestinian Authority or Palestinian political
organisations - and Britons are entitled to dual
citizenship, with any military-service obligations that
entails, there can be no objection. But the fact that
the Palestinian people have no state is of course at the
heart of this uniquely internationally inflammatory
conflict. And those fighting against the illegal
occupation of their land are entitled to do so under
international law.
The British government's indifference to this
recruitment is feeding the alienation and radicalisation
of young Muslims, who can be labelled terrorists for
even voicing support for the Palestinians.
Perhaps British citizens should not serve in foreign
armies full stop. But the essential point is that there
must be equality. If Britons are allowed to join the
Israeli army, the same right should be accorded to those
- particularly of Palestinian origin - who wish to
volunteer to defend lands Israel occupies.
Alternatively, both should be barred.
We need a shift in approach at the top. Tony Blair has
expressed his desire to bring peace to the Middle East,
but his actions - most recently his refusal to condemn
Israel's Beit Hanoun massacre at the UN - scarcely
suggest an honest broker. At home and in the Middle
East, it is time the British government showed some real
even-handedness.
Ismail Patel is chair of the Leicester-based campaign
Friends of Al-Aqsa - iap_foa@yahoo.co.uk
© Guardian News and Media Limited 2006
Comment Guidelines
Be succinct, constructive and relevant to the story. We encourage engaging, diverse and meaningful commentary. Do not include personal information such as names, addresses, phone numbers and emails. Comments falling outside our guidelines – those including personal attacks and profanity – are not permitted.
See our complete Comment Policy and use this link to notify us if you have concerns about a comment. We’ll promptly review and remove any inappropriate postings.