Holocaust Denial or Smart
Move?
By Chris Voidis
12/12/06 "Information
Clearing House" --- -- Why would a man of obvious
intelligence, as President Ahmedinejad of Iran surely
is, want to provoke the West by inspiring a conference
meant to look at the Holocaust? What is really behind
the 'Review of the Holocaust: Global Vision' conference?
Throughout Western media, from the day this conference
was announced until today, and for many more days to
come I am sure, nowhere is this question asked: Why is
this conference being held? Rather, we see a lot of
fingers pointing at Mr. Ahmedinejad's 'obvious'
anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial. Furthermore, it is
taken for granted that this is the case. President
Ahmedinejad cannot be anything else other than an
anti-Semite who is bent on exterminating the Jews living
in Israel.
Yet, no one has bothered to ask why he doesn't start
with the 30 000 or so Jews living in Iran. Why doesn't
he start, for example, with Moris Motamed, an Iranian
Jew who just happens to sit in Iran's Parliament. How
did he get to be a member of the Iranian Parliament,
anyway? Was he elected? I thought there was no democracy
in Iran. Hmmmm.
Could it be that Mr. Ahmedinejad is not interested in
picking up where Hitler left off? After all, it wouldn't
be all that difficult to kill 30 000 people. Look at
Iraq. Unless of course he is afraid that the whole world
would spring into action. After all, we all know that
the life of one Jew is worth the life of a thousand
Muslims. Right? To kill 30 thousand Iranian Jews would
mean killing the equivalent of 30 million people. The
world would most certainly not allow that. Right?
What if Mr. Ahmedinejad is doing one of the most sane
things in the world? What if he is merely calling the
West's bluff? Remember a while back, how the Islamic
world was up in arms over the publication of a cartoon
depicting the prophet Muhammed? People in the West
pointed to Islamic reaction and said "See, these people
are backward. Look at how they react to something as
self evident as freedom of speech."
Well, it seems to me that Mr. Ahmedinejad has made a
fool of the West by tricking us into behaving in the
same way. Mr. Ahmedinejad pinpointed the one thing that
would stir up controversy in the West. Just as it is a
sacrilege to depict the prophet for Islam, so it is a
sacrilege to question the Holocaust in the west. Being
an intelligent man, and knowing full well that the
Holocaust happened, Mr. Ahmedinejad has not questioned
the Holocaust itself. Rather, he questioned the myth
that has grown around it and how it has been used by
Israel and the West in order to deny the rights of the
Palestinians. A smart move by the President of Iran.
I don't think that Mr. Ahmedinejad believes that some
new evidence will be brought forth that will help the
world see that the Holocaust did not happen. He himself
knows that it did. What he wanted to achieve with this
conference he did: he got the Western media and
governments to overreact and by this to show the Islamic
world that the West is untrustworthy and carries a
double standard when it comes to Muslims. It can offend
them at will, but they will not stand for their 'holy
taboos' to be questioned.
Surely the West is now behaving as if a taboo has been
broken. Perhaps this is a good opportunity for people in
the West to reflect on the necessity of respecting the
taboos of other people, and to see that they serve a
purpose and are not just there because people are
'backward'. Also, it may help us to question our own
taboos. What if the Holocaust has been used as a weapon
against the Palestinians? Is that an impossibility? What
if a mythology has been built around the death of 6
million Jews? There's no denying, to my mind, that
millions of Jews were killed, but how has this fact been
used ever since? Has it been used to beat people into
submission? Has it been used to intimidate North
Americans especially, into an uncritical attitude
towards Israel for fear of being called anti-Semites and
racists? Perhaps. It may not be such a bad thing for us
to think about these things...
Comment Guidelines
Be succinct, constructive and relevant to the story. We encourage engaging, diverse and meaningful commentary. Do not include personal information such as names, addresses, phone numbers and emails. Comments falling outside our guidelines – those including personal attacks and profanity – are not permitted.
See our complete Comment Policy and use this link to notify us if you have concerns about a comment. We’ll promptly review and remove any inappropriate postings.