Guantanamo Detainees To Be
Held Even Without Evidence
By Con Coughlin
12/15/06 "Daily
Telegraph" -- -- WASHINGTON — The hard
core of detainees held at America's Guantanamo Bay
detention camp will be held indefinitely even if there
is insufficient evidence to bring them to trial, a
senior Bush administration official said.
Of the 435 detainees being held at Guantanamo, only 10
have so far been charged with terrorism-related
offenses. A further 14 detainees — the so-called high
value detainees such as the alleged mastermind of the
September 11 attacks, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed — are also
expected to face trial now that the U.S. Congress has
passed the Military Commission Act, which will finally
enable America to commence trials of Guantanamo
detainees next year.
But of the remainder, an estimated 200 detainees face
being held indefinitely at Guantanamo because they are
deemed a threat to international security even though
there is insufficient evidence to bring them before a
military commission.
John Bellinger, the legal adviser at the U.S. State
Department who is responsible for defending Guantanamo's
legal status, said the hard core of the detainees will
continue to be held indefinitely either because they are
considered a security threat or because there is nowhere
to send them if the military authorities at Guantanamo
decide to release them.
"The remaining people — other than the ones who have
been approved for release — really do pose a threat,"
Mr. Bellinger said in an exclusive interview with the
Daily Telegraph. "Ten percent of the people we have
released have gone right back to fighting generally in
Afghanistan. It's hard to tell exactly how many people
would go back to actual acts of terrorism, or whether
they would just go back to fighting in Afghanistan."
And despite repeated calls for the Bush administration
to close Guantanamo, Mr. Bellinger was insistent that
the American detention camp in Cuba would continue to
hold detainees that were deemed a security risk.
"There are at this point no plans to transfer those
people from Guantanamo out of Guantanamo," he said. "At
this point the trials will be held on Guantanamo."
More than 700 people have been held at Guantanamo during
the past five years. Most of them were detained during
the war in Afghanistan to overthrow the Taliban in late
2001, while others have been transferred to the camp
after being detained as part of America's global war
against international terrorism.
All the detainees receive a yearly combatant status
review tribunal at which American military officials
determine whether or not individuals continue to pose a
security threat. Nearly 300 detainees have so far been
released, and Mr. Bellinger said a further 100 had been
cleared for release.
But Mr. Bellinger said Washington had been frustrated in
its attempts to reduce the number of people being held
at Guantanamo by the refusal of countries to accept
released detainees.
"Many countries will just not take their nationals
back," said Mr. Bellinger. "We think it is somewhat
hypocritical of international critics to keep calling
for the closure of Guantanamo without offering a place
for any of these individuals."
But, Mr. Bellinger insisted, those detainees who are
still classified a security risk will continue to be
held at Guantanamo indefinitely. "When people say
Guantanamo should be closed, do they really want" the
detainees "to be released outright into their countries
where they might go out and continue to pose a threat to
the international community?"
In the case of alleged high-value detainees such as
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, they might never be released,
even if it was not possible to bring a successful
prosecution against them. "Khalid Sheikh Mohammed is
unlikely to be sent anywhere" other than Guantanamo, he
said.
Comment Guidelines
Be succinct, constructive and relevant to the story. We encourage engaging, diverse and meaningful commentary. Do not include personal information such as names, addresses, phone numbers and emails. Comments falling outside our guidelines – those including personal attacks and profanity – are not permitted.
See our complete Comment Policy and use this link to notify us if you have concerns about a comment. We’ll promptly review and remove any inappropriate postings.