In Somalia,
a reckless U.S.
proxy war
By Salim Lone
Tribune Media Services
12/26/06 "IHT" -- -- NAIROBI -- Undeterred by the
horrors and setbacks in Iraq, Afghanistan and Lebanon,
the Bush administration has opened another battlefront
in the Muslim world. With full U.S. backing and military
training, at least 15,000 Ethiopian troops have entered
Somalia in an illegal war of aggression against the
Union of Islamic Courts, which controls almost the
entire south of the country.
As with Iraq in 2003, the United States has cast this as
a war to curtail terrorism, but its real goal is to
obtain a direct foothold in a highly strategic region by
establishing a client regime there. The Horn of Africa
is newly oil-rich, and lies just miles from Saudi
Arabia, overlooking the daily passage of large numbers
of oil tankers and warships through the Red Sea. General
John Abizaid, the current U.S. military chief of the
Iraq war, was in Ethiopia this month, and President Hu
Jintao of China visited Kenya, Sudan and Ethiopia
earlier this year to pursue oil and trade agreements.
The U.S. instigation of war between Ethiopia and
Somalia, two of world's poorest countries already
struggling with massive humanitarian disasters, is
reckless in the extreme. Unlike in the run-up to Iraq,
independent experts, including from the European Union,
were united in warning that this war could destabilize
the whole region even if America succeeds in its goal of
toppling the Islamic Courts.
An insurgency by Somalis, millions of whom live in Kenya
and Ethiopia, will surely ensue, and attract thousands
of new anti-U.S. militants and terrorists.
With so much of the world convulsed by crisis, little
attention has been paid to this unfolding disaster in
the Horn. The UN Security Council, however, did take up
the issue, and in another craven act which will further
cement its reputation as an anti-Muslim body, bowed to
American and British pressure to authorize a regional
peacekeeping force to enter Somalia to protect the
transitional government, which is fighting the Islamic
Courts.
The new UN resolution states that the world body acted
to "restore peace and stability." But as all major
international news organizations have reported, this
year Somalia finally experienced its first respite from
16 years of utter lawlessness and terror at the hands of
the marauding warlords who drove out UN peacekeepers in
1993, when 18 American soldiers were killed.
Since 1993, there had been no Security Council interest
in sending peacekeepers to Somalia, but as peace and
order took hold, a multilateral force was suddenly
deemed necessary — because it was the Islamic Courts
Union that had brought about this stability.
Astonishingly, the Islamists had succeeded in defeating
the warlords primarily through rallying people to their
side by creating law and order through the application
of Shariah law, which Somalis universally practice.
The transitional government, on the other hand, is
dominated by the warlords and terrorists who drove out
American forces in 1993. Organized in Kenya by U.S.
regional allies, it is so completely devoid of internal
support that it has turned to Somalia's arch- enemy,
Ethiopia, for assistance.
If this war continues, it will affect the whole region,
do serious harm to U.S. interests and threaten Kenya,
the only island of stability in this corner of Africa.
Ethiopia is at even greater risk, as a dictatorship with
little popular support and beset also by two large
internal revolts, by the Ogadenis and Oromos. It is also
mired in a conflict with Eritrea, which has denied it
secure access to seaports.
The best antidote to terrorism in Somalia is stability,
which the Islamic Courts have provided. The Islamists
have strong public support, which has grown in the face
of U.S. and Ethiopian interventions. As in other
Muslim-Western conflicts, the world needs to engage with
the Islamists to secure peace.
Copyright © 2006 The International Herald Tribune
Comment Guidelines
Be succinct, constructive and relevant to the story. We encourage engaging, diverse and meaningful commentary. Do not include personal information such as names, addresses, phone numbers and emails. Comments falling outside our guidelines – those including personal attacks and profanity – are not permitted.
See our complete Comment Policy and use this link to notify us if you have concerns about a comment. We’ll promptly review and remove any inappropriate postings.