He
takes his secrets to the
grave. Our complicity dies with him
How the West armed Saddam, fed him intelligence on his
'enemies', equipped him for atrocities - and then made
sure he wouldn't squeal
By Robert Fisk
12/31/06 "The
Independent" -- -- We've shut him up. The
moment Saddam's hooded executioner pulled the lever of
the trapdoor in Baghdad yesterday morning, Washington's
secrets were safe. The shameless, outrageous, covert
military support which the United States - and Britain -
gave to Saddam for more than a decade remains the one
terrible story which our presidents and prime ministers
do not want the world to remember. And now Saddam, who
knew the full extent of that Western support - given to
him while he was perpetrating some of the worst
atrocities since the Second World War - is dead.
Gone is the man who personally received the CIA's help
in destroying the Iraqi communist party. After Saddam
seized power, US intelligence gave his minions the home
addresses of communists in Baghdad and other cities in
an effort to destroy the Soviet Union's influence in
Iraq. Saddam's mukhabarat visited every home, arrested
the occupants and their families, and butchered the lot.
Public hanging was for plotters; the communists, their
wives and children, were given special treatment -
extreme torture before execution at Abu Ghraib.
There is growing evidence across the Arab world that
Saddam held a series of meetings with senior American
officials prior to his invasion of Iran in 1980 - both
he and the US administration believed that the Islamic
Republic would collapse if Saddam sent his legions
across the border - and the Pentagon was instructed to
assist Iraq's military machine by providing intelligence
on the Iranian order of battle. One frosty day in 1987,
not far from Cologne, I met the German arms dealer who
initiated those first direct contacts between Washington
and Baghdad - at America's request.
"Mr Fisk... at the very beginning of the war, in
September of 1980, I was invited to go to the Pentagon,"
he said. "There I was handed the very latest US
satellite photographs of the Iranian front lines. You
could see everything on the pictures. There were the
Iranian gun emplacements in Abadan and behind
Khorramshahr, the lines of trenches on the eastern side
of the Karun river, the tank revetments - thousands of
them - all the way up the Iranian side of the border
towards Kurdistan. No army could want more than this.
And I travelled with these maps from Washington by air
to Frankfurt and from Frankfurt on Iraqi Airways
straight to Baghdad. The Iraqis were very, very
grateful!"
I was with Saddam's forward commandos at the time, under
Iranian shellfire, noting how the Iraqi forces aligned
their artillery positions far back from the battle front
with detailed maps of the Iranian lines. Their shelling
against Iran outside Basra allowed the first Iraqi tanks
to cross the Karun within a week. The commander of that
tank unit cheerfully refused to tell me how he had
managed to choose the one river crossing undefended by
Iranian armour. Two years ago, we met again, in Amman
and his junior officers called him "General" - the rank
awarded him by Saddam after that tank attack east of
Basra, courtesy of Washington's intelligence
information.
Iran's official history of the eight-year war with Iraq
states that Saddam first used chemical weapons against
it on 13 January 1981. AP's correspondent in Baghdad,
Mohamed Salaam, was taken to see the scene of an Iraqi
military victory east of Basra. "We started counting -
we walked miles and miles in this fucking desert, just
counting," he said. "We got to 700 and got muddled and
had to start counting again ... The Iraqis had used, for
the first time, a combination - the nerve gas would
paralyse their bodies ... the mustard gas would drown
them in their own lungs. That's why they spat blood."
At the time, the Iranians claimed that this terrible
cocktail had been given to Saddam by the US. Washington
denied this. But the Iranians were right. The lengthy
negotiations which led to America's complicity in this
atrocity remain secret - Donald Rumsfeld was one of
President Ronald Reagan's point-men at this period -
although Saddam undoubtedly knew every detail. But a
largely unreported document, "United States Chemical and
Biological Warfare-related Dual-use exports to Iraq and
their possible impact on the Health Consequences of the
Persian Gulf War", stated that prior to 1985 and
afterwards, US companies had sent government-approved
shipments of biological agents to Iraq. These included
Bacillus anthracis, which produces anthrax,
andEscherichia coli (E. coli). That Senate report
concluded that: "The United States provided the
Government of Iraq with 'dual use' licensed materials
which assisted in the development of Iraqi chemical,
biological and missile-systems programs, including ...
chemical warfare agent production facility plant and
technical drawings, chemical warfare filling equipment."
Nor was the Pentagon unaware of the extent of Iraqi use
of chemical weapons. In 1988, for example, Saddam gave
his personal permission for Lt-Col Rick Francona, a US
defence intelligence officer - one of 60 American
officers who were secretly providing members of the
Iraqi general staff with detailed information on Iranian
deployments, tactical planning and bomb damage
assessments - to visit the Fao peninsula after Iraqi
forces had recaptured the town from the Iranians. He
reported back to Washington that the Iraqis had used
chemical weapons to achieve their victory. The senior
defence intelligence officer at the time, Col Walter
Lang, later said that the use of gas on the battlefield
by the Iraqis "was not a matter of deep strategic
concern".
I saw the results, however. On a long military hospital
train back to Tehran from the battle front, I found
hundreds of Iranian soldiers coughing blood and mucus
from their lungs - the very carriages stank so much of
gas that I had to open the windows - and their arms and
faces were covered with boils. Later, new bubbles of
skin appeared on top of their original boils. Many were
fearfully burnt. These same gases were later used on the
Kurds of Halabja. No wonder that Saddam was primarily
tried in Baghdad for the slaughter of Shia villagers,
not for his war crimes against Iran.
We still don't know - and with Saddam's execution we
will probably never know - the extent of US credits to
Iraq, which began in 1982. The initial tranche, the sum
of which was spent on the purchase of American weapons
from Jordan and Kuwait, came to $300m. By 1987, Saddam
was being promised $1bn in credit. By 1990, just before
Saddam's invasion of Kuwait, annual trade between Iraq
and the US had grown to $3.5bn a year. Pressed by
Saddam's foreign minister, Tariq Aziz, to continue US
credits, James Baker then Secretary of State, but the
same James Baker who has just produced a report intended
to drag George Bush from the catastrophe of present- day
Iraq - pushed for new guarantees worth $1bn from the US.
In 1989, Britain, which had been giving its own covert
military assistance to Saddam guaranteed £250m to Iraq
shortly after the arrest of Observer journalist Farzad
Bazoft in Baghdad. Bazoft, who had been investigating an
explosion at a factory at Hilla which was using the very
chemical components sent by the US, was later hanged.
Within a month of Bazoft's arrest William Waldegrave,
then a Foreign Office minister, said: "I doubt if there
is any future market of such a scale anywhere where the
UK is potentially so well-placed if we play our
diplomatic hand correctly... A few more Bazofts or
another bout of internal oppression would make it more
difficult."
Even more repulsive were the remarks of the then Deputy
Prime Minister, Geoffrey Howe, on relaxing controls on
British arms sales to Iraq. He kept this secret, he
wrote, because "it would look very cynical if, so soon
after expressing outrage about the treatment of the
Kurds, we adopt a more flexible approach to arms sales".
Saddam knew, too, the secrets of the attack on the USS
Stark when, on 17 May 1987, an Iraqi jet launched a
missile attack on the American frigate, killing more
than a sixth of the crew and almost sinking the vessel.
The US accepted Saddam's excuse that the ship was
mistaken for an Iranian vessel and allowed Saddam to
refuse their request to interview the Iraqi pilot.
The whole truth died with Saddam Hussein in the Baghdad
execution chamber yesterday. Many in Washington and
London must have sighed with relief that the old man had
been silenced for ever.
'The Great War for Civilisation: The Conquest of the
Middle East' by Robert Fisk is now available in
paperback
Comment Guidelines
Be succinct, constructive and relevant to the story. We encourage engaging, diverse and meaningful commentary. Do not include personal information such as names, addresses, phone numbers and emails. Comments falling outside our guidelines – those including personal attacks and profanity – are not permitted.
See our complete Comment Policy and use this link to notify us if you have concerns about a comment. We’ll promptly review and remove any inappropriate postings.