CIA kidnap victim offered $2 million In hush money
Wife: Cleric offered $2
million deal
By John Crewdson, Tribune senior correspondent. Sherine
Bayoumi and Altin Raxhimi contributed to this report
01/07/07 "Tribune" -- -- ALEXANDRIA, Egypt -- According
to Abu Omar's wife, a few months ago two Egyptian
officials visited her husband in his Cairo prison cell
and made him an offer they hoped he wouldn't refuse.
The offer was $2 million cash, according to the radical
cleric's wife Nabila Ghali. All Abu Omar needed to do
was sign a paper saying he had come to Egypt of his own
accord on Feb. 17, 2003, and to repeat that statement to
the news media.
Feb. 17, 2003, is when Abu Omar vanished while walking
down a side street in Milan, Italy. Prosecutors in Milan
charge that he was kidnapped by the CIA and flown to
Egypt, where he has been imprisoned for most of the time
since then.
When Abu Omar asked where the money would come from, he
was told simply "a foreign intelligence service,"
according to an Italian investigator in the case. In a
letter to another Milan imam after visiting her husband
in prison, Ghali described the offer and said her
husband never responded to it.
Milan's deputy public prosecutor, Armando Spataro, has
the letter now, preserved with other evidence to be used
at the trial of 25 CIA operatives, a U.S. Air Force
colonel and five senior Italian intelligence officials
accused of participating in Abu Omar's kidnapping.
Had Abu Omar agreed to the purported $2 million deal,
there would have been no kidnapping, and therefore no
case. Spataro's investigators are working to find out
who, if anyone, authorized a $2 million payment. A
source close to the investigation said Spataro has
confirmation from within the Italian intelligence
community that the offer was genuine, though not that
the Italians were to be the source of the funds.
A few days after the alleged visit by the two Egyptians,
Abu Omar was moved from Torah Prison on the southern
edge of Cairo to police headquarters in this
Mediterranean port city, where he was born and where his
family assembled on a Sunday evening in late October to
discuss his case.
Gathered in the high-rise apartment of his sister, Rawya,
and her husband, Magdi, a prominent Cairo lawyer--both
asked that their last name not be used--were Abu Omar's
younger brother, Hitham, a chemical engineer and devout
Muslim with a long gray beard, and Ghali, a
schoolteacher dressed head to toe in black.
The family recounted Abu Omar's Kafkaesque encounters
with the Egyptian legal system, which began 13 months
after his abduction in Milan.
Searching
Suspecting that he had been forcibly taken to Egypt, his
colleagues in Milan contacted Cairo lawyer Montasser El
Zayat.
"I searched for him in the prisons of Egypt, and I
presented official requests," El Zayat said in an
interview. "And nobody responded to my requests."
The reason, he explained, is that as far as the
authorities were concerned, Abu Omar was not in Egypt.
"We are talking about a man who was kidnapped in another
state and given to Egypt outside the framework of the
law," El Zayat said.
The search finally paid off by happenstance. "Someone
had witnessed him at the building of State Security," El
Zayat recalled. "Other people who were in jail at that
time and were later released, one of them saw him."
In March 2004, El Zayat brought his client's case before
a special Cairo court set up to handle political
prisoners. El Zayat argued that because there were no
outstanding charges against Abu Omar in Egypt, and no
evidence of his involvement in terrorist activities,
there was no legal basis for his detention.
The court agreed, ordering his release. Before
complying, however, authorities extracted promises from
him not to speak about his abduction or his treatment in
prison, El Zayat said.
"They made him sign papers in which he states that he
came to Egypt on his own accord, and that he was
arrested at the airport in Egypt," El Zayat said. "And
after signing those papers they let him go."
Defiance
As recounted by Abu Omar in a letter written later from
prison, he was warned "that I should beware of opening
my mouth and telling anything about what had happened to
me, from my kidnapping in Italy to my torture in Egypt."
Abu Omar admits that he did the opposite. "I returned to
my home and family in Alexandria," he wrote, "and I
stayed with them for approximately 20 days, and during
those days I called my wife and children in Europe as
well as my friends and told them everything in detail,
beginning with my abduction to my torture in Egypt."
After less than a month as a free man, Abu Omar was
re-arrested as a "danger to the state" under an
"emergency decree" that has remained in force since the
1981 assassination of Egyptian President Anwar Sadat.
According to Rawya, ever since then Abu Omar has been on
a judicial merry-go-round: ordered released by the
courts for lack of evidence, transferred from Torah
Prison to police custody in Alexandria, held there for a
few days, then re-arrested and returned to prison. "This
has happened now seven or eight times," she said.
In late October, after the court ordered his release yet
again, Abu Omar found himself at police headquarters in
Alexandria. He seemed optimistic that this time the
police might let him go home.
"I want to be a good Muslim, to live like a good
Muslim," he said in a brief telephone conversation with
a freelance reporter assisting the Tribune. The reporter
was at the home of Abu Omar's first wife in Albania, and
Abu Omar was using the cell phone of his second wife,
Ghali, while she visited him in custody in Egypt.
After 45 months of confinement, the 43-year-old cleric
expressed hope that he would be released in a day or
two.
Sitting in Rawya's living room, Abu Omar's family was
anxious, but not particularly hopeful. "What's happening
now is exactly what's happened before," Ghali said. "He
will not be released from police custody. He will be
re-arrested."
A few days later her prediction was borne out when the
police arrested Abu Omar under the emergency decree and
returned him to prison.
"We have done everything they have asked of us," said
his brother-in-law, the lawyer. "Nothing has worked."
Comment Guidelines
Be succinct, constructive and relevant to the story. We encourage engaging, diverse and meaningful commentary. Do not include personal information such as names, addresses, phone numbers and emails. Comments falling outside our guidelines – those including personal attacks and profanity – are not permitted.
See our complete Comment Policy and use this link to notify us if you have concerns about a comment. We’ll promptly review and remove any inappropriate postings.